Advanced Search Results
Ambika Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. Joint Cit
Chennai
Feb-16-2001
Direct Taxation
(2001)71TTJ(Mad)871
V. Ramachandran, for the Assessee T. Gorakhnathan, for the Revenue
ORDERA. Kalyanasundharam, Senior V.P.These are appeals preferred by the assessee, a limited company, for the assessment years 1994-95 to 1997-98, though involving a common issue, namely, replacement of certain machinery out of the total plant, whether...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. P.N. Bajaj
Chennai
Nov-19-2002
Direct Taxation
[2003]127TAXMAN233(Mad)
Mrs. Pushya Sitharaman, for the Revenue V. Ramachandran, for the Assessee.
N.V. Balasubramanian, J.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has stated a case under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and referred the following question of law in relation to the assessment of the assessee for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDxn Herbal Manufacturing India (P) Ltd. Vs. Ito and ors.
Chennai
Apr-05-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)204CTR(Mad)378
V. Ramachandran, for the Assessee Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman, for the Revenue
ORDERK. Mohan Ram, J. When WP Nos. 9539 and 9540 of 2006 came up for admission today, Mrs. P.S. Pushya Sitaraman, learned senior counsel standing counsel for the Income Tax Department took notice for the respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rayala Corporation (P) Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit and ors.
Chennai
Dec-22-2000
Direct Taxation
(2002)174CTR(Mad)450
V. Ramachandran for George Cheshiyan & B. Ravi Raja, for the Assessee C. V Rajan, for the Revenue
ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J.The above writ petition has been filed challenging the order of the Commissioner passed under section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and for a direction to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ. Jayalalitha Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai
Sep-30-1999
Direct Taxation
[1999]107TAXMAN476(Mad)
V. Ramachandran, Anitha Sumanth and G. Ashokapathy, for the Petitioner C.V. Rajan, for the Respondent
ORDER1. The above writ petitions have been filed to quash the order in C. No. 1747/1/97-98/C-H, dated 15-10-1997 passed by the Commissioner, Central II, Chennai-34, by which the petitions filed by the writ petitioner under section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. J.H. Tarapore
Chennai
Jun-24-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]123TAXMAN847(Mad)
T.C.A. Ramanujam, for the Revenue V. Ramachandran and Mrs. Anitha Sumanth, for the Assessee
This judgment shall govern two tax cases, they being T.C. Nos. 587 and 588 of 1984.2. In T.C. No. 587 of 1984, the questions referred are at the instance of the revenue. They are :'1. Whether,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFisher-xomox Sanmar Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit
Chennai
Mar-31-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]130TAXMAN247(Mad)
V. Ramachandran and Anita Sumanth, for the Assessee Mrs. Pushya Sitharaman, for the Revenue
ORDERMrs. Pushya Sitharaman, learned counsel takes notice for the respondent.2. By consent of both the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing and disposal.3....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSeshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. Vs. Cit and ors.
Chennai
Jan-28-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]261ITR63(Mad)
V. Ramachandran for Anita Sumanth, for the Assessee Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman, for the Revenue
P.K. Misra J.Heard Mr. V. Ramachandran, learned senior counsel, for the petitioner, and Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman for the respondents.2. The petitioner has prayed for quashing the order bearing G. I. No. 4-S of 1995-96 and 1996-97,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. T. K. Shahal Hassan Musaliar
Kerala
Sep-06-2000
Direct Taxation
[2001]113TAXMAN344(Ker)
P.K. Ravindranatha Menon and N.R.K. Nair, for the Revenue V. Ramachandran and Harun AI Rasheed, for the Assessee
Sankarasubban, J. Both these writ appeals are filed against the judgment in O.P. No. 10606 of 1985. While W.A. No. 829 of 1990 is filed by the respondents in the original petition, the other writ appeal,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSms Schloemann Siemag, A.G. Vs. Dy. Cit and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-26-2001
Direct Taxation
[2001]250ITR97(AP)
V. Ramachandran for B. Ravindra, for the Assessee S.R. Ashok, for the Revenue
S.B. Sinha, C.J.Reference to this Bench has been made by a Division Bench of this court having regard to the importance of theuestion as regards the interpretation of section 220(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »