Advanced Search Results
Ram Chander Vs. Bhim Singh and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
May-23-2008
Property
[2009(1)JCR429]; (2008)151PLR747
Rajive Bhalla, J.1. We are called upon, to resolve an apparent difference of opinion between the ratio of two Full Bench Judgments, namely, Lachhman Singh v. Pritam Chand (1970)72 P.L.R. 341 and Bhartu v. Ram Sarup...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrem Singh and ors. Vs. Union Territory Through Its Administrator and ...
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-20-1992
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1) and 6(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
(1992)102PLR370
V. Ram Sarup, Adv.
ORDERHarjit Singh Bedi, J.1. By the present judgment, I propose to dispose of C.W.P. Nos. 12936, 13958 and 14898 of 1991. The facts have been taken from C.W.P. No. 12936 of 1991.2. The petitioners are owners...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBishun Chand Vs. Girdhari Lal
Mumbai
May-14-1934
Limitation
(1934)36BOMLR723
Wright, J.1. This appeal involves a question of general importance in regard to the law of limitation. The appellants carry on business as money-lenders, and for twenty-five years had been lending money to the respondents, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Devichand Ganesh Vs. Chintaman Yellappa
Mumbai
Mar-22-1944
PropertyCivil
AIR1945Bom116; (1944)46BOMLR763
Sen, J.1. This is an appeal by the decree-holder in certain darkhast proceedings in which he sought to execute a decree obtained by him in Suit No. 161 of 1926 by attachment of the moveables of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChanan Singh Vs. Financial Commissioner Appeals-i and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-27-2005
Property
Transfer of Property Act - Sections 44; Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 - Sections 16
(2005)140PLR103
H.S. Bhullar, Adv.
Satish Kumar Mittal, J.1. In this writ petition, petitioner Chanan Singh has challenged the orders dated 25.9.2000, 25.6.2001, 19.6.2002 and 30.1.2003 passed by the Assistant Collector, 1st Grade, District Collector, Commissioner and Financial Commissioner, Appeals-1, Punjab,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKishan Lal Vs. A.S. Higher Secondary School, Jahangirabad Through B. P ...
Allahabad
Jan-10-1962
Civil
Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 6, 7(iv-A) and 7(iv-A)(2)
AIR1963All330
Satish Chandra, Adv.
Desai, C.J.1. This is a report by the Chief Inspector of Stamps for realising from the appellant, who was the plaintiff in the trial Court, additional Court-fee payable on the plaint. We are not concerned with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmiruddIn and anr. Vs. Panchaiti Akhara Bar a Udasi Nanak Shahi
Allahabad
Jan-08-1937
Civil
169Ind.Cas.181
Bennet, J.1. This is an execution first appeal by the judgment-debtors against an order of the execution Court appointing a Receiver. The circumstances are that the appellants originally owned a zamindari share and certain occupancy holdings...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMina Ram Vs. Amolak Ram and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Jul-17-1965
Civil
Himachal Pradesh (Courts) Order, 1948; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 115; ;Court Fees Act, 1870 - Section 7 - Schedule - Article 17
AIR1966HP4
Ramji Dass, Adv.
ORDER1. This revision-petition is directed against an order of the learned Senior Subordinate Judge, Mahasu, calling upon the petitioner to pay additional court-foes, on the plaint filed by him. 2. The petitioner had brought a suit,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Saran Dass and anr. Vs. Yog Raj and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-07-2004
Tenancy
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(2)
(2004)138PLR241
Vikas Negi, Adv.
M.M. Kumar, J.1. This is a petition under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for brevity, 'the Act') filed by the landlord challenging the concurrent findings of facts recorded by both...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDharambir and anr. Vs. Bhagat Ram and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-23-1992
PropertyCivil
Pre-emption Act, 1913
(1993)103PLR198
Bahadur Singh and; I.S. Ballara, Advs.
A.S. Nehra, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge, Rohtak, on 22-4-1991 by which the appeal of the defendants-appellants was dismissed and the judgment and decree passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »