Advanced Search Results

Ritz Ltd. Vs. D.D. Vyas and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3), 144B, 147, 148, 254 and 256

Reported in : [1990]185ITR311(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : V. Rajgopal, Adv.

T.D. Sugla, J.1. By this petition under articles 19(1)(g) and 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-company (hereinafter referred to as 'the assessee') has challenged the legality and validity of the order of the Income-tax...

Vegi Venkateswara Rao Vs. Vegi Venkatarama Rao Alias Rajababu and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 52 and 54

Reported in : AIR1998AP6; 1997(4)ALT821

Advocate for Appellant : Rajgopal Reddy, Adv.

D. Reddeppa Reddy, J. 1. This is an appeal by the 1st defendant, namely, Vegi Venkateswara Rao in O.S. No. 60 of 1981 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Visakhapatnam against the judgment...

V.V.V.R.K. Yachendra Vs. Special Commissioner and Director of Settleme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 - Sections 39, 39(1), 44(1), 50, 50(7) and 55(1); Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) (Amendment) Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 4, 6 and 9; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956; Interest Act, 1839 - Sections 1

Reported in : 2008(6)ALD165

Advocate for Appellant : V. Rajagopal Reddy, Adv.

ORDERC.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.1. This is yet another writ petition and hopefully the last in the series of writ petitions filed by the petitioner, who is the erstwhile Zamindar of Venkatagiri estate.2. The dispute pertains to...

Ritz Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(8), 28, 68, 139, 143, 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 149, 246 and 271

Reported in : (1995)126CTR(Bom)33; [1995]216ITR138(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Deokinandan, Adv.

Dr. B.P. Saraf, J. 1. By this reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, made at the instance of the assessee, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay, has referred the following question of law to...

Daulat Feeds Duistributors, a Registered Partnership Firm, Through Par ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 20 - Shedule - Articles 1, 14, 52 and 115

Reported in : 2006(4)ALLMR325; 2006(2)BomCR573; (2006)108BOMLR110; 2006(2)MhLj201

Advocate for Appellant : T.S. Ingale, Adv.

Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The appellant-plaintiff preferred this second appeal against the concurrent findings given by both the Courts by observing that the suit for recovery of the outstanding of account for purchase of poultry feed...

P.K. Badiani Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(6A), 10(2), 23A, 66 (1) and 66A(2); Finance Act, 1955; Indian Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment)Act, 1946; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 2(22) and 61; Finance Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR1977SC560; [1976]105ITR642(SC); (1976)4SCC562; [1977]1SCR638

N.L. Untwalia, J.1. This is an appeal by an assessee on grant of a certificate of fitness by the Bombay High Court under Section 66A(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922-hereinafter referred to as the 1922 Act....

Humayun Abdullali Vs. M.G. Abrol and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167 and 188; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR1633

Advocate for Appellant : V. Rajgopal and ;M.H. Thakkar, Advs.

ORDER(1) This is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of two orders, oen made by the 1st respondent, viz., Additional Collector of Customs and the second made by the Central Board...

Gulabsing Fattesing Vasave Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Poona

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(1) and 4(3)

Reported in : [1975]100ITR509(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : V. Rajgopal, Adv.

Kantawala, C.J.1. This is a reference under section 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, referred to us by the Tribunal at the instance of the assessee. The question of law referred for our determination...

M.L. Dahanukar and Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bomba ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2)

Reported in : [1968]68ITR533(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : V. Rajgopal, Adv.

Kotval, C.J. 1. Two questions have been referred for our decision under section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, They are as follows : '1. Whether on the facts and the circumstances of the case, the...

Rajpal Brothers (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(6A)

Reported in : [1971]80ITR463(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : V. Rajgopal, Adv.

K.K. Desai, J.1. This reference under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, has arisen out of a single judgment given by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal on May 21, 1962, in the matter of two...