Advanced Search Results
Kodaikanal Motor Bus Owners' Association, represented by Its Secretari ...
Chennai
Apr-30-2002
Other Taxes
Constitution of India - Articles 301 and 304; Indian Tolls Act, 1851 - Sections 2 and 10; Motor Vehicles Taxation Act
(2002)2MLJ538
M. Krishnappan and ;V. Raghupathy, Advs.
ORDERK.P. Sivasubramaniam, J.1. In both the writ petitions, the petitioners, Kodaikanal Motor Bus owners' Association and Kodaikanal Lorry Owners' Association respectively have questioned the validity of G.O.(D) 51, Highways Department, dated 14.6.2000 in so far as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNavarasan Vs G.K.Reddy
Chennai
Apr-06-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.04.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl. O.P. Nos. 8345, 8405, 8513 & 8294 of 2026 and Crl. M.P. Nos.5918, 5965, 6058 & 5883 of 2026 Navarasan ......
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.R.Shridharan vs M/S.Tripower Enterprises (Private) Limited
Chennai
Jan-09-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 12.12.2025 DELIVERED ON : 09.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Rev. Aplw.Nos.282 to 288 and 302 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shanmugaraj Vs. the Deputy Superintendent of Police and anr.
Chennai
Dec-19-2003
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226; Madras Police Act, 1888 - Sections 41(4)
AIR2004Mad235; 2004(1)CTC750
K. Chandru, Sr. Counsel for ;P.V. Bakthavatchalam, Adv.
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. One Shanmugaraj, West District Secretary of Puthiya Thamizhagam Political party, aggrieved by order of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thenkasi/first respondent herein dated 6.12.2003, rejecting his request for holding an all party Hunger...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharat Pulverising Mills Limited Madras Vs. the Joint Director of Agri ...
Chennai
Jun-19-1992
Civil
Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 14, 19, 20, 22, 24 and 21(1); Insecticide Rules, 1971 - Rules 21, 22, 23 and 24; Insecticides Act, 1958; Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 - Sections 83 and 29; Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977
AIR1993Mad74; (1992)IIMLJ511
Mr. S.K.L. Ratan, Senior Adv. and;Mr. P.S. Venkasubramanian, Adv.
ORDER1. The petitioner is a manufacturer of insecticides. The Agricultural Officer (Quality Control) of the Office of the Assistant Director of Agriculture, Papana-sam, took a sample of Plan Protection Chemical Monocrotophos 36% from the shop of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSoudambika Finance Pvt. Ltd. Coimbatore and Etc. Etc. Vs. Union of Ind ...
Chennai
Apr-30-1992
Civil
Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 4(3), 5, 6(1, 2 and 3), 7(2), 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16(2 and 3), 17(2), 18(4 and 5), 19, 20(1), 21, 22(2), 24, 28, 29, 30, 31, 39(2), 48(1), 50, 64, 75, 76, 77 and 79; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 245 and 246; Chit Funds (Pondicherry) Rules, 1986; Pondicherry Chit Funds Act, 1966; Chitties Act, 1964; Cochin Kuris Regulations, 1932; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 45-N and 451; Tamil Nadu Chit Fund Rules, 1984 - Rules 4A, 13, 18(4 and 5), 28, 31 and 63; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 39(2) and 48; Indian Registration Act, 1908
AIR1993Mad190; [1995]82CompCas302(Mad)
K. Chandramouli and;Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram, Sr. Counsel for;M/s. Vijayanarayanan,;S. Silambanan,;N. Sivasankaran and;A.L. Somayaji, Advs. for;M/s. V.N. Venkataraj,;N. Jothi,;V.N. Kumara Ganapathy,;N.
ORDER1. Since common and similar as well as overlapping questions of law and facts arise for consideration and submissions have been made by counsel appearing on either side, these writ petitions are considered and dealt with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamnad District Nalivutor Meenaver Sangam and Others Vs. the Asstt. Di ...
Chennai
Mar-10-1994
Civil
Tamil Nadu Marine Fishing Regulations Act, 1983 - Sections 5(3)
AIR1994Mad329
S. Natarajan, Adv., ;Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram, ;Sr. Counsel for M/s. S. Silambanan and ;B. Sai Chandra Vadhan, Adv.
ORDER1. These Writ Petitions were taken up for final hearing by consent of all parties. Heard Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram, senior Advocate for petitioners in W.Ps. Nos. 1007, 1075 and 1076 of 1994 and Mr. V. Raghupathy,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharat Pulverising Mills Ltd. Vs. the Joint Director of Agriculture (i ...
Chennai
Jun-19-1992
Civil
(1992)2MLJ511
ORDERK.S. Bakthavatsalam, J.1. The petitioner is a manufacturer of insecticides. The Agricultural Officer (Quality Control) of the office of the Assistant Director of Agriculture, Papanasam, took a sample of Plant Protection Chemical Monocrotophos 35% from the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.Kumar Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Jan-10-2014
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :10. 01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL W.P.No.25341 of 2012 & M.P.No.3 of 2013 N.Kumar ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Secretary to Government of Tamil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Gnanasekar Vs. Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Madras
Chennai
Jun-22-1993
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 320 and 345
AIR1994Mad8; (1994)IMLJ22
R. Singaravelan, Adv.
ORDERW.P. No. 2210/93 :1.The writ petition is for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the second sentence of para (iv) of the notification issued by the respondent dt. 15-6-92 and direct the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »