Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v raghavachari · Page 1 of about 408 results (0.099 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 21 2011

M.Esakimuthu Vs. the Labour Court and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-21-2011

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 33(2)(b); Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Shri.V.Raghavachari, Adv.

O R D E R1. The Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the dismissal of the I.D.No.165 of 1992 on the file of the first respondent confirming the order of dismissal passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2012

D.Beeman Vs. Tamil Nadu State Election Commission and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-12-2012

Subject : Election

Acts : Tamil Nadu Pannchayats (Election) Rules, 1995 - Rule 88; Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act 1994 - Section 258; Constitution of India - Article 343 (o)(b)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.N.Jothi, Adv.

The writ petition seeks for a mandamus directing the respondents 1, 2 and 4 to permit the petitioner to function as the duly elected Chairman of Kothagiri Panchayat Union, the Nilgiris District. 2. The petitioner seeks...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 1993

G. Gopinath Vs. Ministry of Surface Transport and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-02-1993

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act - Sections 4

Reported in : (1994)ILLJ649Mad

Advocate for Appellant : V. Raghavachari, Adv.

Somasundaram J.1. These writ appeals have been filed against the common order of the learned Single Judge dated December 24, 1992 dismissing Writ Petitions 9135 of 1992, 10318 of 1992, 11302 of 1992 and 9091 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 23 2011

Kumar.P Vs. Sarubala R.Thondaiman and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-23-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6 Rule 16; Representation of Peoples Act 1951 - Sections 81 read with 100(1)(d)(iii)(iv), 129; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 49(O); Constitution of India - Article 324; Representative of People Act - Section 77

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.V.Raghavachari, Adv.

ORDER1. This is an application filed by the first respondent in the Election Petition (ELP No.4/2009) under Order 14 Rule 8 of O.S. Rules read with Order 6 Rule 16 of CPC. Election Petition No.4 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2012

Gowri Mohan Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Build ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-07-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: V. Raghavachari, Advocate. For the Respondent: B.B. Senthilkumar, Advocate.

(Prayer: This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent herein...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 1994

Manivannan Vs. Ever King Garments

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-05-1994

Subject : Company

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 142; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas473(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : V. Raghavachari, Adv.

Pratap Singh J.1. The accused in C.C. No. 6 of 1993 on the file of the Juridical Magistrate, No. II, Tiruppur, under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, has filed this petition, praying to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 2005

Y. Vijayalakshmi @ Rambha Vs. Manickam Narayanan, Proprietor, Seventh ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-08-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138 and 142; Powers of Attorney Act, 1882 - Sections 2 and 303; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 190, 198, 199, 200 to 203, 205, 273, 302 and 317; Contract Act - Sections 183

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)33; IV(2005)BC482; 2005CriLJ3572; 2005(3)CTC480

Advocate for Appellant : V. Raghavachari, Adv.

ORDERS.R. Singharavelu, J.1. Criminal Original Petitions No.1225 and 1226 of 2005 are filed to call for the records in C.C.No.7527 and 7764 of 2004 respectively on the file of XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet and quash the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1997

R. Gandhi and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by the Ministry of La ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-29-1997

Subject : ConstitutionMotor Vehicles

Acts : Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990 - Sections 3, 3(1), 12, 15A and 19; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226, 254, 255, 300A and 301 to 304; Central Act; Constitutional Law; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Madras High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1965 - Rules 1A and 2(4); Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1988

Reported in : 1997(3)CTC255

Advocate for Appellant : R. Gandhi, ;K.M. Vijayan, Sr. Advs., ;K. Ravi, ;M. Palani, ;R. Janakiraman, ;M.S. Subramaniam, ;M. Sundar, ;G. Rajagopalan, ;V. Raghavachari, ;Mythili Srinivasan and ;R. Srinivas, Advs.

ORDERJanarthanam, J.1. All these actions-this Batch of Writ Petitions-filed by Importers-Dealers or otherwise - of motor vehicles into local area from any 1997/3/17 place outside the State of Tamil Nadu for use or sale herein- owning...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2009

K. Kumar Vs. Tmt. Poomani,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-28-2009

Subject : Motor VehiclesOther Taxes

Acts : Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1974 - Sections 82(3); Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 - Rules 212, 214 and 279

Reported in : (2009)8MLJ1006

Advocate for Appellant : V. Raghavachari, Adv.

H.L. Gokhale, C.J.1. Heard Mr. V. Raghavachari, learned Counsel in support of this appeal. Mr. K.M.Venugopal, learned Counsel appears for the contesting respondent No. 1/caveator. Mr. Raja Kalifulla, learned Government Pleader appears for respondents 2 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2012

Gowrappan and ors. Vs. Santhosh Babu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-10-2012

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act; Central Enactment Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Contempt of Courts Act - Section 19

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.V.Raghavachari, Adv.

Being aggrieved by the dismissal of the Contempt Petition in C.P.No.921 of 2009 dated 11.7.2011, appellants have preferred this Letters Patent Appeal. 2. Brief facts are as follows: The dry land situated at No.124, Kothapetta village,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial