Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v r venkitakrishnan · Page 1 of about 36 results (0.028 seconds)

Mar 09 1978

Sundaram Finance Ltd. Vs. Regional Transport Officer and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-09-1978

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 222

Reported in : [1979]117ITR334(Ker)

Advocate for Appellant : V.R. Venkitakrishnan, Adv.

Chandrasekhara Menon, J.1. The third respondent got possession of a stage carriage vehicle, as per Ext. P-2 agreement, styled as a 'hire purchase agreement'. In accordance with Ext. P-2 agreement, the petitioner, who is carrying on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2005

Thomas Vs. Saidalavi

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-28-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Civil Courts Act, 1957 - Sections 13(1); ;Kerala Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 1984; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 21(2) - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 2005(2)KLT724

Advocate for Appellant : V.R. Venkitakrishnan, Sr. Adv.,; S. Ananthakrishnan and;

K.R. Udayabhanu, J.1. Whether an appeal from the judgment of the Munsiff would lie straight away to the High Court bypassing the Court of the District Judge is the problem paused in the Writ Petition. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2004

Mulloor Chit Fund Vs. Pathumma Beevi

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-20-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 107(1) - Order 3, Rule 4; Kerala High Court Rules - Rule 19; Kerala High Court Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 2004(2)KLT1078

Advocate for Appellant : V.R. Venkitakrishnan, Amicus Curiae; K.V. Sohan, Adv.

ORDERR. Bhaskaran, J.1. Today Adv. Sri. T.M. Mohammed Yousuff appears and takes notice for the respondents and requests for time for arguments. On the last posting when it came up for admission, I felt doubt as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Oct 15 2003

Vasu S/O Pattu Vs. Pattu S/O Veerandi and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-15-2003

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 15

Reported in : AIR2004Ker339

Advocate for Appellant : V.R. Venkitakrishnan, Adv.

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Plaintiff is the appellant. Suit was Instituted for specific performance of Clause 8 of the agreement dated 16-7-1983.2. Plaintiff is the son. First defendant is the father and second defendant is the brother....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 1994

C.K. Rajan Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-10-1994

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92 and 151 - Order 26, Rule 10; Kerala Guruvayur Devaswom Act, 1978 - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR1994Ker179

Advocate for Appellant : B. Radhakrishna Pillai and; A. Ambika Devi, Advs.

Paripoornan, J. 1. This is a public interest litigation. It concerns the famous Sree Krishna Temple, Guruvayur -- a very ancient temple of unique importance worshipped and held in great reverence by millions all over the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 1981

R.P. Ahammadkutty Haji Vs. Vattakandy Ahammadkutty Haji and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-13-1981

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96

Reported in : AIR1982Ker146

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Govinda Wariyer,; Sebastian Davis,; H. Sivaraman

ORDERP.C. Balakrishna Menon, J.1. The dispute in regard to the right of management of a Mosque once settled' between the parties has escalated to this Court on the question of interpretation of the settlement itself. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1988

Canara Bank Vs. Gokuldas Shenoy and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-09-1988

Subject : CommercialContract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 139 and 141; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 55

Reported in : [1991]72CompCas298(Ker)

Advocate for Appellant : T.R.G. Warriar and; Sebastian Davis, Advs.

Shamsuddin, J.1. The plaintiff in O. S. No. 10 of 1978 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Kasaragod is the appellant.2. The suit was filed for recovery of money. It is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2006

Sundaram Vs. Palakkad Municipality

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-27-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4; Madras Town Planning Act, 1920 - Sections 12, 13, 14 and 15

Reported in : 2006(4)KLT657

Advocate for Appellant : V.R. Venkatakrishnan, Sr. Adv.,; T.A. Ramadasan and; N.K

V.K. Bali, C.J.1. The case has rather a checkered history. It has its roots from a notification issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, hereinafter referred to as 'Act of 1894', on 7.1.1981....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1985

Beerankoya Haji Vs. P.P. Mohammedkutty

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-08-1985

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rules 6 and 13

Reported in : AIR1986Ker10

Advocate for Appellant : V.R. Venkatakrishnan and; K.N. Sudhakaran Pillai, Advs.

K.S. Paripoornan, J.1. The plaintiffs in O. S. 19 of 1977 of the Munsiff's Court, Kozhikode are the appellants. The defendants are the respondents. The suit was one for recovery, of possession of plaint schedule property...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1964

Narayana Guptan Vs. Madhava Menon and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-04-1964

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 99 - Order 26, Rule 10(3)

Reported in : AIR1965Ker95

Advocate for Appellant : N. Sundara Iyer and; V.R. Venkitakrishnan, Advs.

S. Velu Pillai, J.1. This second appeal by the second defendant arises in a suit by the respondent to recover possession, of the property in Schedule B which is a part: of the property in Schedule...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.