Advanced Search Results
T.V. Venugopal Vs. Ushodaya Enterprises Ltd, and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-03-2011
Intellectual Property Rights And Constitution
Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 45(1) ; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Section 159(4) ; Trade & Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 46, 21 - Rule 24(3) ; Constitution of India - Section 136 ; Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 22 ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2 Rule 2(3) ;
1. These appeals are directed against the judgment delivered by a Division Bench of High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Letter Patent Appeal Nos. 12 and 13 of 2001 on 15.06.2001.2. Brief facts which have been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Executive Committee Rep. by Its General Secretary Rev. Moses Jayak ...
Chennai
Sep-14-2009
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 8
(2009)8MLJ329
V. Prakash, Sr. Counsel for ;Adrian D. Rozario, Adv.
M. Chockalingam, J.1. These appeals challenge a common order of the learned Single Judge of this Court made in O.A. No. 492 of 2009, an application for interim injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV. Gurunathan and Others Vs. the Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation ...
Chennai
Sep-10-2012
Education
For the Petitioners: V. Prakash, Senior Counsel. For the Respondents: R1, P.H. Aravind Pandian, Additional Advocate General, Asst.by C. Munusamy, R2, S. Venkataraman, Advocates.
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to first consider the petitioners for promotion to the post of Assistants and only...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jeelani Mosque Committee (R) Vs. the Shimoga Urban Development Authori ...
Karnataka
Aug-18-2005
Civil
Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960; Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 10(2), 15, 16, 17, 39, 69 and 78(4)
ILR2005KAR5819; 2006(2)KarLJ579
S.V. Prakash, Adv.
ORDERRam Mohan Reddy, J.1. The petitioner aggrieved by the cancellation of the allotment of a site by the 1st respondent, and the subsequent allotment of the very same site to the 2nd respondent, followed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskStephen A. (Deceased) and anr. Vs. Management of B.H.E.L. and anr.
Chennai
Nov-05-1998
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Article 226
(1999)IIILLJ1174Mad; (1999)IMLJ197
V. Prakash, Adv.
P. Sathasivam, J.1. The prayer in the writ petition is as follows:To issue orders, directions or writs in particular a writ in the nature of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.Srinivasan.Vs. the Management of India Airlines Ltd.,and anr.
Chennai
Sep-02-2010
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
Mr.V.Prakash; Mr.K.Krishnamoorthy, Advs.
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking an order in the nature of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents herein not to exclude...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState by Tiptur Rural Police Vs. Marulasiddaiah Alias Murali
Karnataka
Feb-16-2006
Criminal
2006CriLJ1825; II(2006)DMC139; ILR2006KAR1256; 2006(2)KarLJ173
N.V. Prakash, Additional State Public Prosecutor
Chidananda Ullal, J.1. In this case, the case of the prosecution is that, the accused's wife died a homicidal death by strangulation.2. The learned Additional State Public Prosecutor, Sri N.V. Prakash argued that there is no...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Elangovan and ors. Vs. Madras Refineries Ltd., Rep. by Its Chairman ...
Chennai
Jan-28-2005
Labour and Industrial
Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 46; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 2(1), 10(1) and 12(1); Bombay Industrial Relations Act - Sections 3(13)
(2005)IILLJ653Mad; (2005)1MLJ686
V. Prakash, Sr. Counsel for ;M. Ramamoorthy
N.V. Balasubramanian, J. 1. The writ appeal is preferred g inst the judgment of learned Judge in W.P.No. 10628 of 1988 dated 30.9.1997. The writ petitioners are the appellants herein and the point that rises in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSundaram Industries Employees Union (Coach Division) Vs. Management of ...
Chennai
Feb-29-2000
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2
(2000)IILLJ990Mad
V. Prakash, Adv.
N.V. Bala Subramanian, J.1. The writ petition is for the issue of a writ of declaration to declare the demand of respondents 1 and 2 (hereinafter to be referred to as the management) that the members...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsservadham, Vs. the General Manager, Indian Airlines Limited
Chennai
Dec-11-2002
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F, 25G and 25H; Industrial Disputes Rules - Rule 78; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 2
[2003(97)FLR313]; (2003)ILLJ1091Mad
S. Sundar, Adv. in W.A. No. 808 of 2000, ;P.V.S. Giridhar, Adv. in W.A. No. 861 of 2000, ;K.P. Krishna Shetty, Adv. in W.A. No. 1435 of 2000, ;K. Palanisamy, Adv. in W.A. No. 951 of 2000, ;V. Prakash,
P. Shanmugam, J.1. The subject matter of the appeal relates to question of regularization of casual workers. The learned single Judge upheld the Scheme of the respondent for regularization. Not being satisfied, the workers have filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »