Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v prakash · Page 1 of about 1,732 results (0.400 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 03 2011

T.V. Venugopal Vs. Ushodaya Enterprises Ltd, and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-03-2011

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights And Constitution

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 45(1) ; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Section 159(4) ; Trade & Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 46, 21 - Rule 24(3) ; Constitution of India - Section 136 ; Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 22 ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2 Rule 2(3) ;

1. These appeals are directed against the judgment delivered by a Division Bench of High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Letter Patent Appeal Nos. 12 and 13 of 2001 on 15.06.2001.2. Brief facts which have been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2009

The Executive Committee Rep. by Its General Secretary Rev. Moses Jayak ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-14-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 8

Reported in : (2009)8MLJ329

Advocate for Appellant : V. Prakash, Sr. Counsel for ;Adrian D. Rozario, Adv.

M. Chockalingam, J.1. These appeals challenge a common order of the learned Single Judge of this Court made in O.A. No. 492 of 2009, an application for interim injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 2012

V. Gurunathan and Others Vs. the Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-10-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioners: V. Prakash, Senior Counsel. For the Respondents: R1, P.H. Aravind Pandian, Additional Advocate General, Asst.by C. Munusamy, R2, S. Venkataraman, Advocates.

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to first consider the petitioners for promotion to the post of Assistants and only...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 18 2005

Jeelani Mosque Committee (R) Vs. the Shimoga Urban Development Authori ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-18-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960; Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 10(2), 15, 16, 17, 39, 69 and 78(4)

Reported in : ILR2005KAR5819; 2006(2)KarLJ579

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Prakash, Adv.

ORDERRam Mohan Reddy, J.1. The petitioner aggrieved by the cancellation of the allotment of a site by the 1st respondent, and the subsequent allotment of the very same site to the 2nd respondent, followed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 1998

Stephen A. (Deceased) and anr. Vs. Management of B.H.E.L. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-05-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1999)IIILLJ1174Mad; (1999)IMLJ197

Advocate for Appellant : V. Prakash, Adv.

P. Sathasivam, J.1. The prayer in the writ petition is as follows:To issue orders, directions or writs in particular a writ in the nature of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2010

R.Srinivasan.Vs. the Management of India Airlines Ltd.,and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-02-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.V.Prakash; Mr.K.Krishnamoorthy, Advs.

1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking an order in the nature of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents herein not to exclude...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2006

State by Tiptur Rural Police Vs. Marulasiddaiah Alias Murali

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-16-2006

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1825; II(2006)DMC139; ILR2006KAR1256; 2006(2)KarLJ173

Advocate for Appellant : N.V. Prakash, Additional State Public Prosecutor

Chidananda Ullal, J.1. In this case, the case of the prosecution is that, the accused's wife died a homicidal death by strangulation.2. The learned Additional State Public Prosecutor, Sri N.V. Prakash argued that there is no...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2005

M. Elangovan and ors. Vs. Madras Refineries Ltd., Rep. by Its Chairman ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-28-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 46; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 2(1), 10(1) and 12(1); Bombay Industrial Relations Act - Sections 3(13)

Reported in : (2005)IILLJ653Mad; (2005)1MLJ686

Advocate for Appellant : V. Prakash, Sr. Counsel for ;M. Ramamoorthy

N.V. Balasubramanian, J. 1. The writ appeal is preferred g inst the judgment of learned Judge in W.P.No. 10628 of 1988 dated 30.9.1997. The writ petitioners are the appellants herein and the point that rises in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 29 2000

Sundaram Industries Employees Union (Coach Division) Vs. Management of ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-29-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : (2000)IILLJ990Mad

Advocate for Appellant : V. Prakash, Adv.

N.V. Bala Subramanian, J.1. The writ petition is for the issue of a writ of declaration to declare the demand of respondents 1 and 2 (hereinafter to be referred to as the management) that the members...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2002

Asservadham, Vs. the General Manager, Indian Airlines Limited

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-11-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F, 25G and 25H; Industrial Disputes Rules - Rule 78; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 2

Reported in : [2003(97)FLR313]; (2003)ILLJ1091Mad

Advocate for Appellant : S. Sundar, Adv. in W.A. No. 808 of 2000, ;P.V.S. Giridhar, Adv. in W.A. No. 861 of 2000, ;K.P. Krishna Shetty, Adv. in W.A. No. 1435 of 2000, ;K. Palanisamy, Adv. in W.A. No. 951 of 2000, ;V. Prakash,

P. Shanmugam, J.1. The subject matter of the appeal relates to question of regularization of casual workers. The learned single Judge upheld the Scheme of the respondent for regularization. Not being satisfied, the workers have filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial