Advanced Search Results

Sandip Baliram Sandbhor and Others Vs. Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corp ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.P. Vaidya

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service. Taken up for disposal. 2. The Petitioners, nineteen in number, challenge the Award passed by the Industrial Court, Pune dismissing their Complaint (ULP) No. 177 of 2005....

P.A. Karkhanis, Indian Inhabitant Residing at Sacchidanand Cooperative ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : UCO Bank Officer Employees (Conduct) Regulation, 1976 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR2827; (2010)ILLJ227Bom

Advocate for Appellant : Neeta P. Karnik, Adv.

P.B. Majmudar, J.1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order of the dismissal dated 30th March, 1998 passed against him by the disciplinary authority second respondent which order has been confirmed by...

Air India Aircraft Engineers' Association and Others Vs. Air India Ltd ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

A.M. Khanwilkar, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, by consent. Counsel for the Respondents in the respective petitions waive notice. Taken up for final disposal, by consent. 2. As common questions are involved, these petitions...

Rashtriya Hatmag Yantramag Kamgar Sangh Vs. K.D. Kochargaonkar and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971

Reported in : [2000(85)FLR609]; (2000)ILLJ1564Bom

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Deshpande, Adv.

J.A. Patil, J.1. By this writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners Union has challenged the order dated July 27, 1993 passed in Complaint (ULP) No. 87 of 1988 by the...

Ratnakar P.M. Vs. Uco Bank Through Its Regional General Manager and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; UCO Bank Officer Employees (Conduct) Regulations, 1976 - Regulation 3

Reported in : (2010)ILLJ37Bom

Advocate for Appellant : Neeta P. Karnik, Adv.

P.B. Majmudar, J.1. The challenge in this petition is to the dismissal order dated December 9, 1998 passed by the disciplinary authority second respondent against the petitioner which order has been confirmed by order dated June...

John Joseph Khokar Vs. B.S. Bhadange and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 227; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions of Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 ; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 1998(2)BomCR174; 1997(3)MhLj907

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Vaidya, Adv.

ORDERR.M. Lodha, J.1. The only question raised in the present writ petition and that needs consideration is: whether the petitioner John Joseph Khokar is a workman within the meaning of section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes...

Punikem Textile Private Ltd. Vs. Samidha Sanjay Munj

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : 2007(3)BomCR575

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Vaidya, Adv.

Kanade V.M., J.1. Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent.2. The petitioner is challenging the award passed by the 2nd Labour Court dated 7/8/...

Shubhada Sunil Phansekar Vs. Travel Corporation (India) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 25F and 25J; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2007(114)FLR964]; 2007(4)MhLj822

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Vaidya, Adv.

V.M. Kanade, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondent.2. The petitioner is challenging the order passed by the Labour Court in a Complaint (ULP) No. 261/2000 and Revision...

Shubhada Sunil Phansekar Vs. Travel Corporation (India) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F and 25J

Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR730

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Vaidya, Adv.

Kanade V.M., J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondent.2. The petitioner is challenging the order passed by the Labour Court in a complaint (ULP) No. 261/2000 and Revision...

Mahindra and Mahindra Workers Union Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 28(1A)

Reported in : (2005)IIILLJ283Bom

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Vaidya, Adv.

1. Heard Mr. Vaidya in support of this petition. Ms. Gayatri Singh appears for Respondent No. 3.2. Respondent No. 3 has raised a grievance with respect to the functioning of the Petitioner-Union. He claims to be...