Advanced Search Results
Indian Organic Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Chennai
Jul-27-1982
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 7, 8, 8(1), 9, 9A, 9B, 9B(3), 9B(4) and 9B(5); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A
1983(12)ELT34(Mad)
V.P. Raman for C. Hanumantha Rao, Adv.
1. The petitioner is a limited company registered under the Indian Companies Act. It is engaged in the business among others of manufacturing fibres/tops. The item falls under sub-item I of them 18 of the First...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: E.V.K. Sampath and anr.
Chennai
Dec-21-1960
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 198B, 198B(4) and 198B(6) to (11); Constitution of India - Article 14
AIR1961Mad318; 1961CriLJ125; (1961)1MLJ328
V.P. Raman and ;P.R. Gokulakrishnan, Advs.
ORDERAnantanarayanan, J.1. I desire, at the outset, to state briefly the background of facts with reference to which these revision proceedings have arisen. At the same time, I wish to be very clear that I am...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: C.N. Annadurai and ors.
Chennai
Apr-16-1958
ConstitutionCriminal
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1); Madras City Police Act, 1888 - Sections 41; Indian Police Act - Sections 30(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144
AIR1959Mad63; 1959CriLJ204; (1958)IIMLJ363
V.P. Raman, Adv.;Adv. General and ;Public Prosecutor
1. This is a reference made to this Court under Section 432, Cri. P. C., by the Second Presidency Magistrate in M. P. No. 329 of 1958 in C. C. No. 184 of 1958 at the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Engineering Investments P. Ltd. Vs. Bharath Heavy Electricals Ltd., Ma ...
Chennai
Feb-15-1982
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 24(1)
AIR1983Mad1
V.P. Raman, Adv. for ;A.S. Kailasam and ;R.Thiagarajan, Advs.;B.T. Seshadri, Adv.
ORDER1. Petition is filled under Section 24(1)(b)(i) of the Civil P.C. for withdrawing the appeal in A.S. No.297 of 1981 on the file of the Principal Judge, City Civil Court for declaration that the Bank Guarantees...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Coffee Board Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and ors.
Karnataka
Aug-16-1985
Sales Tax
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 5(3), 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 17
ILR1986KAR1365; 1985(2)KarLJ397; [1985]60STC142(Kar)
F. S. Nariman, Senior Advocate assisted by R.J. Babu;V.P. Raman, Senior Advocate assisted by T. Subba Rao, ; P.K. Kurien, Senior Advocate, ; K.P. Kumar and ;B. Veerabhadrappa, Advs.
ORDERPuttaswamy, J.1. On a reference made by one of us, these cases were posted before a Division Bench for disposal. 2. A statutory Board called 'the Coffee Board' ('the Board') which was formerly called the Indian...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVideowala Vs. Union of India and ors.
Chennai
Jan-08-1986
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226; Madras High Court Rules - Rule 6
AIR1987Mad52
V.P. Raman, Adv. for ;P.S. Raman, Adv. and ;P. Chidambaram, Adv.
ORDER1. Both these petitions have been filed by the Film Federation of India, represented by its President, D. Ramanujam. In the former petition the prayer is for vacating the interim stay granted in W.M.P. 15682 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhagwandas Goenka Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Chennai
Feb-12-1960
FERACriminal
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1), 9 and 19; Constitution of India - Article 20(3)
AIR1961Mad47; 1961CriLJ273; (1960)IIMLJ458
Adv. General and ;V.P. Raman, Adv.
1 . These are two connected appeals instituted by Bhagwandas Goenka, against the convictions and sentences of the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate in C. C. Nos. 6910 and 6911 of 1956, convicting this appellant under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD. D. Medical College and D. D. Hospital, Rep by Its Chairman Dr. T.D. ...
Chennai
Aug-21-2012
Education
For the Petitioner: R. Yashod Vardhan, SC for G. Sankaran, Advocate. For the Respondent: V.P. Raman, Standing Counsel for MCI.
(Prayer: This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBapalal and Co. Vs. Government of India and ors.
Chennai
Dec-11-1980
Excise
Gold Control Act; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2
1981(8)ELT587(Mad)
V.P. Raman, Adv. for ;V. Manivannan and Krishnappan
ORDER1. Messrs Bapalal and Co. (Manufacturing) is the petitioner herein. The petitioner firm has been registered as a partnership firm under the Indian Partnership Act in 1933, the registration number being No. 63 of 1933. In...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV. Dhandayuthapani Vs. S.P. Krishnamurthi and ors.
Chennai
Apr-23-1986
Constitution
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 114; Tamil Nadu Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955 - Sections 11; Tamil Nadu Cinema (Reguiation) Rules, 1957 - Rule 14(2)
AIR1988Mad78
V.P. Raman, Adv. for ;Jayanthi Natarajan and ;P.S. Raman, Advs.
Chandurkar, C.J. 1. The only question which arises in this appeal is whether the State Government has power to review its own order made under S. 11 of the Tamil Nadu Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955 (hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »