Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v p raman · Page 1 of about 153 results (0.217 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 27 1982

Indian Organic Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-27-1982

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 7, 8, 8(1), 9, 9A, 9B, 9B(3), 9B(4) and 9B(5); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A

Reported in : 1983(12)ELT34(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Raman for C. Hanumantha Rao, Adv.

1. The petitioner is a limited company registered under the Indian Companies Act. It is engaged in the business among others of manufacturing fibres/tops. The item falls under sub-item I of them 18 of the First...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 1960

In Re: E.V.K. Sampath and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-21-1960

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 198B, 198B(4) and 198B(6) to (11); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1961Mad318; 1961CriLJ125; (1961)1MLJ328

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Raman and ;P.R. Gokulakrishnan, Advs.

ORDERAnantanarayanan, J.1. I desire, at the outset, to state briefly the background of facts with reference to which these revision proceedings have arisen. At the same time, I wish to be very clear that I am...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 1958

In Re: C.N. Annadurai and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-16-1958

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1); Madras City Police Act, 1888 - Sections 41; Indian Police Act - Sections 30(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144

Reported in : AIR1959Mad63; 1959CriLJ204; (1958)IIMLJ363

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Raman, Adv.;Adv. General and ;Public Prosecutor

1. This is a reference made to this Court under Section 432, Cri. P. C., by the Second Presidency Magistrate in M. P. No. 329 of 1958 in C. C. No. 184 of 1958 at the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 15 1982

Engineering Investments P. Ltd. Vs. Bharath Heavy Electricals Ltd., Ma ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-15-1982

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 24(1)

Reported in : AIR1983Mad1

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Raman, Adv. for ;A.S. Kailasam and ;R.Thiagarajan, Advs.;B.T. Seshadri, Adv.

ORDER1. Petition is filled under Section 24(1)(b)(i) of the Civil P.C. for withdrawing the appeal in A.S. No.297 of 1981 on the file of the Principal Judge, City Civil Court for declaration that the Bank Guarantees...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 1985

The Coffee Board Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-16-1985

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 5(3), 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 17

Reported in : ILR1986KAR1365; 1985(2)KarLJ397; [1985]60STC142(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : F. S. Nariman, Senior Advocate assisted by R.J. Babu;V.P. Raman, Senior Advocate assisted by T. Subba Rao, ; P.K. Kurien, Senior Advocate, ; K.P. Kumar and ;B. Veerabhadrappa, Advs.

ORDERPuttaswamy, J.1. On a reference made by one of us, these cases were posted before a Division Bench for disposal. 2. A statutory Board called 'the Coffee Board' ('the Board') which was formerly called the Indian...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 1986

Videowala Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-08-1986

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Madras High Court Rules - Rule 6

Reported in : AIR1987Mad52

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Raman, Adv. for ;P.S. Raman, Adv. and ;P. Chidambaram, Adv.

ORDER1. Both these petitions have been filed by the Film Federation of India, represented by its President, D. Ramanujam. In the former petition the prayer is for vacating the interim stay granted in W.M.P. 15682 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 1960

Bhagwandas Goenka Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-12-1960

Subject : FERACriminal

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1), 9 and 19; Constitution of India - Article 20(3)

Reported in : AIR1961Mad47; 1961CriLJ273; (1960)IIMLJ458

Advocate for Appellant : Adv. General and ;V.P. Raman, Adv.

1 . These are two connected appeals instituted by Bhagwandas Goenka, against the convictions and sentences of the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate in C. C. Nos. 6910 and 6911 of 1956, convicting this appellant under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2012

D. D. Medical College and D. D. Hospital, Rep by Its Chairman Dr. T.D. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-21-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: R. Yashod Vardhan, SC for G. Sankaran, Advocate. For the Respondent: V.P. Raman, Standing Counsel for MCI.

(Prayer: This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 1980

Bapalal and Co. Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-11-1980

Subject : Excise

Acts : Gold Control Act; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT587(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Raman, Adv. for ;V. Manivannan and Krishnappan

ORDER1. Messrs Bapalal and Co. (Manufacturing) is the petitioner herein. The petitioner firm has been registered as a partnership firm under the Indian Partnership Act in 1933, the registration number being No. 63 of 1933. In...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 1986

V. Dhandayuthapani Vs. S.P. Krishnamurthi and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-23-1986

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 114; Tamil Nadu Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955 - Sections 11; Tamil Nadu Cinema (Reguiation) Rules, 1957 - Rule 14(2)

Reported in : AIR1988Mad78

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Raman, Adv. for ;Jayanthi Natarajan and ;P.S. Raman, Advs.

Chandurkar, C.J. 1. The only question which arises in this appeal is whether the State Government has power to review its own order made under S. 11 of the Tamil Nadu Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955 (hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial