Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v p chaudhary · Page 1 of about 67 results (0.114 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 27 2004

Dr. R.K. Sharma Vs. University of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-27-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Delhi University Act, 1922 - Sections 4, 8, 17, 21 and 30; Constitution of India

Reported in : 112(2004)DLT88; 2004(75)DRJ17; 2005(1)SLJ302(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Chaudhary, Sr. Adv. and; Puneet Aggarwal, Adv

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Petitioner seeks to impugn letters dated 15.5.2003 and 13.6.2003 addressed to Shyamlal College (hereinafter referred to as the 'College') by the University of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the 'University').2. Letter dated 15.5.2003...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 1997

Smt. Shalini Rawat Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-11-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 437

Reported in : ILR1997Delhi665

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Chaudhary and; Suraj Saxena, Advs

ORDER1. In Ajit Kumar v. State (1997) 4 AD (Delhi) 469 : 1997 Cri LJ 4268 while accepting the appeal against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, I wrote : 'The very first month...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 1997

Shalini Rawat Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-11-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 364-A and 411

Reported in : 1998IAD(Delhi)69; 1998CriLJ1815; 1998(3)Crimes30; 71(1998)DLT19; 1998(44)DRJ81

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.P. Chaudhary, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. Suraj Saxena, Adv

ORDERJaspal Singh, J.1. In Ajit Kumar v. State (1997 IV AD (Delhi) 469) while accepting the appeal against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, I wrote:.ls1 'The very first month of the year 1993...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 11 2001

Subhash Behari Lal and ors. Vs. the Registrar Co-operative Societies a ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-11-2001

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : 2001VAD(Delhi)390; 92(2001)DLT375; 2001(59)DRJ411

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.P. Chaudhary, Sr. Adv. and; Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Adv

ORDERManmohan Sarin, J.1. Rule. With the consent of the parties writ petition is taken up for disposal.2. Petitioners, three in number, have filed the present writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus, directing respondent No. 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 2000

Shakuntla Garg Vs. Shri Megh Raj

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-24-2000

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicle Act, 1939 - Sections 9 and 110-A

Reported in : 2001ACJ354; 86(2000)DLT423; 2000(54)DRJ543; (2000)126PLR42

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Satinder Verma,; Mr. V.P. Chaudhary Sr. Adv. and; Ms. S

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. FAO. 352/80 is appeal by the claimants and FAO. 353/80 is appeal by the Insurance Company. The claimants filed the petition u/s 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 claiming a sum of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1992

B.L. Kapur Vs. Madan Lal Khurana

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-20-1992

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 47(1992)DLT32

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Chaudhary,; Rajender Dhawan,; Sushma Sachdeva,;

B.N. Kirpal, J.(1) The challenge in this writ petition is to the letter issued by respondent No. 1, who was the Chairman of the Governing Body of the Rajdhani College, New Delhi, whereby he had directed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2003

Oriental Insurance Co. Vs. Sh. C.R. Dutta and ors. and Dr. Rajinder Na ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-28-2003

Subject : Motor VehiclesInsurance

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 95 and 95(2)

Reported in : I(2004)ACC438; 2005ACJ1778; 2003VIIAD(Delhi)321; 2003(71)DRJ648

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Chaudhary, Sr. Adv. and; Nitinjya Chaudhary, Adv

S.K. Mahajan, J. 1. Admit.2. Since common questions of law and facts are involved in both these appeals they are disposed of by this common Order.3. The insurance company has filed these appeals challenging the award...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 2007

Dalit Manav Uthan Sansthan Vs. Commissioner, Municipal Coproration of ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-08-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 142(2007)DLT497; 2007(96)DRJ667

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Chaudhary, Sr. Adv. and; N.K. Singh, Adv

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. These writ petitions question the decision of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) awarding contracts for providing cooked mid-day meals to students of Primary schools in Delhi.2. The Supreme Court of India,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2002

Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vs. Kiran Construction Co. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-27-2002

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(3), 11(4), 11(5), 11(6), 13 and 16; Arbitration Act, 1940; Arbitration Law; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 102(2003)DLT908

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Chaudhary, Sr. Adv. and; M.M. Kalra, Adv

Usha Mehra, J. 1. By this order, we propose to dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos. 1710/2002 and 1719/2002. These Writ Petitions raise common questions of fact and law. The facts lie in a narrow compass.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 02 2006

B.K. Mathur and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-02-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971; Government of India (Transaction of Business) Rules, 1961 - Rule 6(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(90)DRJ536

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Chaudhary, Sr. Adv.,; G. Tushar Rao and; N. Chaudha

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. By this common judgment, the above three petitions filed by Journalists, Cameramen, Correspondents, Editorial Consultants, Reporters and others who were allotters of Government accommodation under the Press Pool are being decided. The petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial