Advanced Search Results

State of Maharashtra Vs. Kusum Charudutt Bharma Upadhye

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1981)83BOMLR75; 1981MhLJ93

Madon, J.1. The circumstances which led to this Special Bench being constituted are that on September 10, 1980 a Division Bench of this High Court consisting of Madon and Shah JJ., while hearing an Appeal, namely,...

Devidayal Rolling and Refineries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. A.V. Borkar, Superinten ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 9(2), 10, 52 and 173G

Reported in : 1983(12)ELT338(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. R. Bhandare, Mr. Bhandare

1. The Superintendent of Central Excise, Range IV, Bombay Division, Bombay, issued a demand notice in the sum of Rs. 17,255.36 under rule 9(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, in respect of copper and copper...

Union of India Vs. Chemical Process Equipments Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B; Central Excises & Customs Law (Amendment) Act, 1991; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 11

Reported in : 1993LC297(Bombay); 1992(59)ELT377(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri V.N. Lokur and;Shri M.I. Sethna, Advs.

Pendse, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the Union of India against judgment dated March 21, 1983 delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bharucha in Writ Petition No. 1243 of 1981. By the impugned judgment, the...

Gurupadappa Shivlingappa Vs. Akbar Sayad Budan Kadri

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act LVII [57] of 1947 - Sections 12(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (1908) - Sections 47 - Order 23, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1950Bom252; (1950)52BOMLR143

Advocate for Appellant : V.N. Lokur, Adv.

Shah, J.1. The plaintiff filed a salt, being suit No. 272 of 1946, in the Court of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Belgaum, seeking to obtain possession of certain premises from the defendant on the...

Bhimaji Krishnarao Vs. Hanmantrao Vinayak and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu-law

Reported in : AIR1950Bom271; (1950)52BOMLR290

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Shah and ;V.N. Lokur, Advs.

Chagla, C.J.1. The facts leading up to this first appeal are that one Vinayak Bothe had three sons, Dattatraya, Hanmantrao and Krishnaji. Vinayak and Dattatraya died long before 1923. Krishnaji died in 1923 leaving Hanmantrao as...

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Mehta Construction Co. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 29

Reported in : 1991(1)BomCR400

Advocate for Appellant : V.N. Lokur, ;T. Satyavathy and ;Meena Masurkar, Advs.

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. This is a petition to set aside an award dated 15th October 1987 made by Arbitrator Shri G.D. Chopra. By the said award the learned Arbitrator has directed the petitioner to pay a...

Dayaram Kashiram Vs. Bansilal Raghunath

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 11(3), 12, 12(2), 12(3) and 50; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106 and 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 36 - Order 41, Rule 32; Limitation Act - Schedule - Articles 96, 97 and 182(2)

Reported in : AIR1953Bom214; (1953)55BOMLR30; ILR1953Bom387

Advocate for Appellant : V.N. Lokur, Adv.

Rajadhyaksha, J.(1) This application has come before a Division Bench as it involves decision of a somewhat important point of law in the matter of interpretation of Sub-section (3) of Section 12, Bombay Rents, Hotel and...

Ramchandra Laxman and ors. Vs. the Bank of Kolhapur

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23, 171 and 176; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 253; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 34, Rule 4

Reported in : AIR1952Bom315; (1952)54BOMLR245; ILR1952Bom715

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Jathar, ;V.N. Lokur, ;K.R. Bengeri and ;P.V. Vaze, Advs.

FACTS One Krishnaji (defendant No. 1) was an employee of the Bank of Kolhapur (plaintiff. In the course of his work as such employee he committed various defalcations by unauthorisedly operating on three khatas of the...

Union of India Vs. Metal Distributors Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B

Reported in : 1993LC343(Bombay); 1992(60)ELT196(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.N. Lokur,;Mr. C.J. Shah and;Mr. K.C. Sidhwa, Advs.

Mrs. Sujata Manohar, J.1. This is an appeal by the Union of India, the Collector of Customs and Others against a judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 14th September, 1984 under which he has directed...

State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Roop Kumar Dayaram Gursahani (Dr.) a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Medical Colleges Rules - Rule 13A; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 1987(3)BomCR271

Advocate for Appellant : V.N. Lokur and ;Nalini S. Chagla, Advs. in A. No. 735/86 and ;R.D. Borude, Adv. in A. No. 1113/86;R.L. Dalal, ;M.D. Dhiodia and ;S.M. Tidke, Advs. in A. No. 1113/86;E.P. Bharucha and Pankaj M. Patel,

T.D. Sugla, J.1. These appeals raise a common question regarding selection to the post of Registrar from amongst the students registered to post graduate and/or post graduate (super specialities) courses in Medical Colleges at Bombay. The...