Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v n agarwal · Page 1 of about 27 results (0.083 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 07 1999

Subhas Ganguly Vs. Industrial Tribunal, Agra and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-07-1999

Subject : ConstitutionLabour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21 and 226; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6E and F; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC1903; [1999(82)FLR562]; (1999)3UPLBEC1950

Advocate for Appellant : V.N. Agarwal, Adv.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner is an employee of Mercury Travels (India) Limited which is a registered company under the Companies Act. In paragraph 2 of the writ petition, it has been contended that since the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2002

Mustafa HussaIn Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-06-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Services) Rules, 1975 - Rules 5 and 6

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC951; [2002(94)FLR951]

Advocate for Appellant : S.A. Gilani, Adv.

D.S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Sri S.A. Gilani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri V.N. Agarwal, learned standing counsel of the State of U.P., representing the respondents.2. Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2006

Youth Hostel Through Its Warden Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court an ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-12-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2K, 4K and 6N; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3655; [2006(111)FLR33]

Advocate for Appellant : Satish Kumar Rai, Adv.

Rajes Kumar, J.1. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the award dated 28.11.2003 passed by the respondent No. 1 in Industrial Dispute No. 71 of 2001, Smt. Anita Sharma v. Youth...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 07 1980

Shiv NaraIn Agarwal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-07-1980

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 4 and 15; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 64(1)

Reported in : (1980)19CTR(All)314; [1983]139ITR999(All)

C.S.P. Singh, J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following questions of law for opinion of this court:'1. Whether on a true construction of the memorandum dated January 2, 1963, the Tribunal could on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2002

Rajendra Singh Vs. Accountant General, U.P., Lekha Ii and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-11-2002

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC1804; (2002)3UPLBEC2118

Advocate for Appellant : Ranjit Saxena, Adv.

S.N. Srivastava, J. 1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner made following prayers : (i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to give pension...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2001

Kamleshwar Nath Srivastava Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-23-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XLVII, Rules 1 and 2; Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC138; [2002(92)FLR199]; (2002)1UPLBEC608

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Srivastava, Adv.

D.S. Singh, J. 1. Heard Sri B.P. Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-applicant, and Sri V.N. Agarwal, learned standing counsel of the State of U.P., representing the respondents. 2. After the lapse of an interminable...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2004

Mahesh Bahadur Saxena Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-09-2004

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC263

Advocate for Appellant : Bharat Ji Agrawal, ;R.P. Agrawal, ;Piyush Agrawal and ;P.K. Misra, Advs.

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The plaintiff was posted as a clerk in the office of the Regional Inspectress of Girls School at Bareilly in 1962. On 11.7.1966, the plaintiff placed a written note on the leave application...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2000

Dhirendra Kumar Gautam Vs. U.P. Public Services Tribunal, Lucknow and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-12-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; U.P. Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Service) Rules, 1975

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC689; [2001(88)FLR757]

Advocate for Appellant : Mahesh Gautam and ;Vijay Gautam, Advs.

D. S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Sri Mahesh Gautam, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri V. N. Agarwal, the learned standing counsel of the State of U. P., representing the respondents.2. Dhirendra Kumar Gautam,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2001

Amrit Lal Vs. U.P. Public Services Tribunal, Lucknow and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-08-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Public Service Commission) Rules, 1979 - Rule 9; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC787; [2001(88)FLR908]; (2001)1UPLBEC585

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Shiromant Shukla and ;Mahendra Pal Singh, Advs.

ORDERD. S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Sri Mahendra Pal Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri V. N. Agarwal, learned standing counsel of the State of U. P., representing the respondents.2. Order and judgment of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2002

Dhirendra Chaturvedi Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-14-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Service of Engineer Class II (Irrigation Branch) Rules, 1936 - Rule 5

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1280; [2002(95)FLR501]; (2002)3UPLBEC2528

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Gupta and ;V.K. Gupta, Advs.

D.S. Sinha and S.N. Srivastava, JJ. 1. Heard Sri A. K. Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri V. N. Agarwal, learned standing counsel for the State of U. P., representing the respondents. 2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial