Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v m limaye · Page 1 of about 29 results (0.062 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 11 1982

Vithal Shankar Dokhe Vs. Bhavdu Sakharam Dokhe (Deceased) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-11-1982

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 32F(1A), 32G, 78 and 85A(2)

Reported in : 1983(1)BomCR27

Advocate for Appellant : V.M. Limaye, Adv.

S.J. Deshpande, J.1. This is the petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the landlord challenging the decision of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, dated September 15, 1979. Detailed facts are not necessary to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 1955

Devshankar Gangaram Mehta Vs. Bachubha Devsing Chudasama and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-26-1955

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 2(20) and 34(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Tenancy Law

Reported in : AIR1956Bom113

Advocate for Appellant : V.M. Limaye, Adv.

Vyas, J.1. This is an application under Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India by Devshankar Ganga-ram Mehta who is the original landlord. This applicant made an application No. 3067 of 1950 in the Court of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 1980

The Municipality of Trimbak Vs. Ramchandra Kisan Aher

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-15-1980

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 88; Land Acquisition Act

Reported in : AIR1981Bom18

Advocate for Appellant : V.M. Limaye, Adv.

1. The short question for decision in this appeal is whether the word 'acquire' in this case means the acquisition by the defendant-Municipality under the Land Acquisition Act or whether it Includes the acquisition by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 08 1956

Ambu Rama Mhatre and anr. Vs. Bhau Halya Patil and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-08-1956

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Agricultural Debtors' Relief Act, 1947 - Sections 4, 6, 6(1), 6(2), 22, 24, 25(2), 27, 31 and 32; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 60 and 91; Madras Agriculturists' Relief Act - Sections 14; Debt Law

Reported in : AIR1957Bom6; (1956)58BOMLR972; ILR1957Bom283

Advocate for Appellant : V.M. Limaye, Adv.

1. Bhau Halya Patil, whom I will hereafter ruler to as the 'first respondent', and four others filed Debt Adjustment Application No. 682 of 1947 in the Court of the Civil Judge, Junior 'Division, at Pen...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 1971

Rayabai Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-12-1971

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80

Reported in : 1972MhLJ706

Advocate for Appellant : V.M. Limaye, Adv.

ORDER1. This is a petition by a landlord whose suit for possession of the property was dismissed by the appellate Court which reversed the decree of the trial Court which granted the claim.2. The petitioner is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 1956

Dattatraya Vishnu Vs. Ganpat Ragho and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-12-1956

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 34 and 34(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1957Bom193; (1957)59BOMLR164; ILR1956Bom336

Advocate for Appellant : V.M. Limaye, Adv.

Chagla, C.J.1. This Pull Bench has been constituted to construe Clause (c) of Sub-section (2) of Section 34 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act 1948. When we look at the scheme of Section 34,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1956

Khalilulla Hasmiya Ghole and anr. Vs. Yesu Raghu Dhadvel and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-26-1956

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 31A and 34(2-A); Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1953; Tenancy Law

Reported in : AIR1957Bom200; (1957)59BOMLR201; ILR1957Bom355

Advocate for Appellant : V.M. Limaye, Adv.

Gajendragadkar, J. 1. This special civil application by the landlords raises the vexed question of construing one of the conditions laid down by Section 34 when a landlord seeks to eject his tenant on the ground...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 21 1980

Krishnabai Vs. Dnyandeo Laxman Yeyale and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-21-1980

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1982 - Sections 8

Reported in : AIR1982Bom107

Advocate for Appellant : V.M. Limaye, Adv.

1. This second appeal is filed by original defendant No. 1 against the decree for possession passed against her by the learned. Assistant Judge, Satara. The original plaintiffs and defendant No. 2 are the respondents before...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 1980

Sopan T. Mhetre and anr. Vs. Shankar Balwant Jagtap

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-17-1980

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 4, 5, 29, 29(1), 29(2), 29(3) and 32G; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1952; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 116

Reported in : (1981)83BOMLR255

Advocate for Appellant : V.M. Limaye, Adv.

R.D. Tulpule, J.1. An interesting question of law arises in this petition which was filed by the landlords of land bearing Survey No. 303/2 of village Saswad, Taluka Purandar, District Puna.2. The litigation which has reached...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 1967

Chatusshakhiya Brahmavrinda Gayaran Trust and ors. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-23-1967

Subject : Property

Acts : Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 - Sections 7, 8(1) and 8(3); Defence of India Rules, 1959 - Rules 9(3) and 75

Reported in : AIR1970Bom18

Advocate for Appellant : V.M. Limaye, Adv. in No. 15/66, ;Govt. Pleader in Nos. 114 to 119/65 and ;R.R. Jahagirdar, Adv. in Nos. 301, 303 to 308/65

Chitale, J.1. This is a group of appeals preferred by the claimants, as well as by the Union of India against the decision of the learned Arbitrator appointed under the provisions of the Requisitioning and Acquisition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial