Advanced Search Results
District Sangli Vs. the State of MaharashtrA.
Mumbai
Sep-27-2011
Education
ORAL JUDGMENT [PER: V.M. KANADE J.] 1. Heard. 2. A report has been submitted by Senior Inspector of Kurlap Police Station. 3. The learned APP appearing on behalf of the State submits that the appellant Gopala...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGulabbhai Bapubhai Gawandi Vs. Sonubai Bapurao Katkar (Smt.) and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-11-1982
Tenancy
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 32G and 32P
1983(1)BomCR187
V.M. Kanade, Adv. for ;K.M. Kanade, Adv.
R.A. Jahagirdar, J.1. This petition arises out of proceedings under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, hereinafter referred to as 'the Bombay Tenancy Act'. Five lands were the subject-matter of the tenancy of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSomling Ramanna Patrigida Vs. the State of Maharahstra
Mumbai
Aug-18-2011
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - section 302, 325, 323, 149, 147, 148, 300, 299, 304, 425, 324; Evidence Act - Section 27
ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per V.M. Kanade, J.) 1. Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants in both these appeals and the learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. Both these appeals...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sarjerao Shahaji Kokare Vs. the State of MaharashtrA.
Mumbai
Sep-08-2011
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302, 304, 34,
ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per V.M. Kanade, J.) 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant and the learned APP appearing on behalf of the Respondent - State in Criminal Appeal No.111 of 1991 so...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnand at Bhausaheb Yuvraj Patil. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Oct-10-2011
Land Acquisition
ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per V.M. Kanade, J.) 1. Appellants are original accused Nos. 1 and 2. (For the sake of convenience they shall be hereinafter referred to as "accused Nos. 1 and 2".) They are challenging the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Balasaheb Rangnath Khade Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors
Mumbai
Sep-21-2011
Land Acquisition
ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per V.M. Kanade, J.) 1. An interesting question which falls for consideration before this Court is:- "Whether a "victim" can file an appeal against the order of acquittal passed by the Trial Court without...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askibraya @ Iqbal Ajij Mujawar Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-01-2012
Criminal
Oral Judgment: (V.M. Kanade J.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The Appellant is convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karad for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArun Kumar Krishnarao Balpande Vs. Wasudeorao Kondbaji Ganar and Other ...
Mumbai
Oct-13-1995
Criminal
Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 20(3), 129 and 215; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201, 302 and 376
1996CriLJ1091; 1996(1)MhLj491
Uday Dastane, Adv.
L. Manoharan, J.1. By this criminal contempt petition, the petitioner seeks to invoke the suo motu jurisdiction of this Court to punish the respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to 14 for having committed criminal contempt of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askibraya @ Iqbal Ajij Mujawar Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-01-2012
Criminal
Oral Judgment: (V.M. Kanade J.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The Appellant is convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karad for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVital Nutraceuticals Private Limited Through Its Director, Ganesh Vith ...
Mumbai
Jan-28-2014
MRTP
G.S. Kulkarni, J. 1. I have had the privilege of going through the erudite judgment of my learned brother Mr.Justice V.M.Kanade. Having deliberated over the arguments advanced by the learned Counsel for contesting parties in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »