Advanced Search Results
Mohan Singh Vs. Jaipur Metals and Electricals Ltd.
Rajasthan
Jan-16-1996
Labour and Industrial
Rajasthan Relief Undertaking (Special Provision) Act, 1961; Constitution of India - Article 226
[1997(75)FLR771]; (1996)IILLJ551Raj
V.L. Mathur, Adv.
ORDER1. This special appeal arises out of an order passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the appellant's writ petition and upholding the order of dismissal from service.2. The appellant was employed as a driver in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshraf and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jan-05-1979
Criminal
1979WLN(UC)1
S.C. Agrawal, J.1. This appeal has been filed under Section 410 of the Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 against the judgment dated 27th November, 1973 pissed by the Sessions judge, Bharatpur. in Sessions Case No. 36...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Rajasthan Vs. Rugga and ors.
Rajasthan
Nov-28-1979
Criminal
1979WLN(UC)480
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bundi, dated 26-11-1970. By hat judgement, the learned Judge held the respondents not guilty for the charges under Sections...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Laxmi Industrial Corporation Vs. K.K. Tewari and anr.
Rajasthan
Sep-08-1994
Labour and Industrial
Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 15(2) and 17
[1995(70)FLR707]; (1995)IILLJ276Raj; 1995(1)WLC651
R.K. Kala, Adv.
Arun Madan, J.1. The petitioner, which is a corporate industrial establishment and engaged in the manufacturing of edible oil by oil seeds, had availed of the services of respondent No. 2 and 29 others as workmen...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOfficial Liquidator Vs. Pusha Mal Narendra Kumar and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-22-1985
Company
1986(1)WLN148
Suresh Chandra Agrawal, J.1. In all these applications, the question which arises for consideration is as to whether the non-petitioners are entitled to claim set-off in these proceedings initiated by the Official Liquidator under Sections 446...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOfficial Liquidator of Shield Shoe Company P. Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs ...
Rajasthan
Sep-08-2006
Company
[2007]135CompCas467(Raj); RLW2007(2)Raj1505; [2007]75SCL41(Raj)
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. By way of judge's summons taken out under 1 Sections 542 and 543(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act') the official liquidator has prayed for an order:(i) to declare...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr Raj Deep JaIn Vs.
Rajasthan
Aug-04-2011
Company
Companies (Court) Rules,1959 - Rule 9; Companies Act,1985 - Section 16, 20(1) (2)
Mr. J.K. Singhi; Mr. Sandeep Taneja, Adv
1. Instant company application has been filed by applicant Rajdeep Jain, Ex-Director/Promoter of M/s. Deeps Special Steels Ltd. u/R.9 of the Companies (Court) Rules,1959 seeking permission of this Court for recalling the order dt.30.01.2004 passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Indo Continental Hotels and Resorts Ltd.;
Rajasthan
Apr-20-1990
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391
[1990]69CompCas93(Raj); [1990]185ITR38(Raj)
Anant Kasliwal, Adv.
M.B. Sharma, J.1. Company Petitions Nos. 4 of 1988 and 5 of 1988 have been filed by Indo Continental Hotels and Resorts Ltd. (for short, 'the transferee-company') and Hotel Pink City Pvt. Ltd. (for short, 'transferor-company')...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRatan Kumar Sanghi Vs. Ashok Kumar Singhive and ors.
Rajasthan
Sep-20-1991
Company
1992(1)WLC244; 1991WLN(UC)448
M.B. Sharma, J.1. It is a company application filed by Smt. Uma Sanghi in company petition No. 19/87. In company petition No. 19/87 this Court under its order dated 27.7.90 had ordered that the company M/s...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S.Tarachem Laboratories. Vs. the Presiding Officer and anr.
Rajasthan Jaipur
Oct-05-2010
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2(s), 17-B, 25-F; Payment of Wages Act; Drugs and Cosmetics Act; Constitution Of India - Article 226.
Shri R.K. Kala; Shri Rupin Kala, Advs.
1. Dispute involved in these three writ petitions is between common parties, namely, management of M/s Tarachem Laboratories, Jaipur and workman S.K. Nagesh and, therefore, they were all clubbed and heard together and are being decided...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »