Advanced Search Results
RaisuddIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Jan-14-2003
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 226
2003VAD(Delhi)430; 2003(68)DRJ377
R.K. Mangal, Adv
Usha Mehra, J. 1. Mr. V.K. Shall, Standing Counsel for the NCT of Delhi has filed the affidavit of Shri T.N. Mohan, Deputy Commissioner of Police (PHQ) in compliance with the order passed by this court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFederal Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. D.N. Dhir
Delhi
Apr-02-1990
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 25(B)
41(1990)DLT278; 1990(18)DRJ351
M.L.Varma,; Y.K. Jain,; Vibha Gupta,;
Mahinder Narain, J.(1) By this petition, I have to see whether the order which has been passed by Mr. V.K. Shall, Additional Rent Controller, is in accordance with the law.(2) I have beard the counsel for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Kasturi Lal
Delhi
Nov-04-1985
CriminalFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7
1986CriLJ1474; 29(1986)DLT273; 1986(10)DRJ91; 1986RLR141
S.T. Singh and; Gulshan Rai, Advs
G.R. Luthra, J.(1) The present criminal revision petition is directed against the order of discharge passed on March 18, 1983 by Shri V.K. Shall, Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi. It was the respondent who was discharged in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Niranjan Lal Vs. Kanta Devi
Delhi
Nov-01-1992
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(l)
49(1993)DLT152
V.K. Srivastava and; D.K. Rustogi, Advs
J.K. Mehra, J.(1) This civil revision petition is directed against the order of eviction passed by Shri V.K. Shall, Add). Rent Controller, Delhi, asbe then was, in Eviction Case No. 37 of 1986 whereby the Add)....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPuthutotam Estates (1943) Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Oct-07-1983
Direct Taxation
Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1955 - Sections 5 and 5(3)
(1984)42CTR(Mad)57; [1984]148ITR341(Mad)
K. Srinivasan, Adv.
Ramanujam, J.1. These tax revision cases filed by the assessee are directed against the order of the agricultural Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, in A.T.A. Nos. 44 and 45 of 1980. 2. The assessee-company owns Puduthotam and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajinder Kumar Sachar Vs. N.N. Vohra and anr.
Delhi
Jan-11-1995
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Court Act, 1971 - Sections 2
57(1995)DLT605
V.K. Shall, Adv
Cyriac Joseph, J. (1) According to the petitioner the respondents have committed civil contempt as defined in Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act1971. The allegation is that the respondents have violated the undertaking given...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHukam Singh Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.
Delhi
Aug-07-1991
Property
45(1991)DLT73; 1991RLR510
M.K. Garg and; V.K. Shall, Advs
B.N. Kirpal, J. (1) Rule D.B.(2) This is yet another case which shows, we only hope, the in-efficiency of the Dda at the cost of, as usual, the citizens of this country. (3) The petitioner had...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManju Bala Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
May-04-1994
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
1994IIIAD(Delhi)48; 54(1994)DLT537; 1994(29)DRJ485
N.S. Dalal,; B. Babbar and; V.K. Shall, Advs
D.P. Wadhwa, J. (1) These four petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution raise a common question. The petitioners in all these four petitions seek a writ of mandamus or any other writ or direction...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskE. Padmanabhan Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Feb-21-1994
ServiceCriminal
Army Rules, 1950 - Rule 27; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 9
1994IAD(Delhi)797; 53(1994)DLT823; 1994(28)DRJ571
Prasanthi Prasad and; V.K. Shall, Advs
Y.K. Sabharwal, J.(1) The petitioner, an officer of the Indian Army in the rank of Colonel who was due to retire with effect from 30th September, 1993 on attaining the age of super annuation, was placed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.C.M. Data System Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Mar-16-1995
Civil
58(1995)DLT226
Vinay Bhasin and; V.K. Shall, Advs
M.K. Sharma, J.(1) This writ petition filed by the petitioner is directed against the award of contract to the respondent No. 2 for supply of 40 Pc Ats 386DX with Ink Jet Printer to Modi Olivetti;...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »