Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v k kapur · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.127 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 18 2006

Jeet and anr. Vs. Poonam and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-18-2006

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2008ACJ38

Mahesh Grover, J.1. Aggrieved by the award dated 2.1.2006 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sonepat (hereinafter described as 'the Tribunal') in the M.A.C.T. Case No. 9 of 2005, the driver and the owner of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2006

National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pappu and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-28-2006

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : III(2006)ACC309

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.K. Kapur

M.M. Kumar, J.1. The National Insurance Company is in appeal against the award dated 7.11.2005, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fast Track Court, Sonepat (for brevity, 'the Tribunal'). The Tribunal has found that the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 1986

Mahinder Singh Vs. Manju and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-08-1986

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : 2(1986)ACC24

Mahinder Narain, J.1. On 6-4-1976 at about 1.45 p.m. a scooter was being driven by Sh. Krishan Lal Sawhney, along the Netaji Subhash Marg. He was proceeding from Darya Ganj side towards the Red Fort, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 14 2000

Satish Sharma Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Decided on : Nov-14-2000

Subject : Consumer

Dr. P.K. Vasudeva, Member: 1. This appeal has been filed Under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the order dated 11.5.2000 passed in Complaint Case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1965

Dalip Singh Gujar Singh Vs. R.P. Biswasj

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-30-1965

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 204(1A), 252, 252(2), 256 and 540

Reported in : AIR1967P& H95; 1967CriLJ401

Advocate for Appellant : Puran Chand Mehta, Adv.

ORDERGurdev Singh, J.1. This is a petition for revision against the order of Shri V.K. Kapur, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, New Delhi, dated the 12th May 1964, whereby he permitted to respondent (complainant) to examine three witnesses who...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 1991

Chander Parkash Vs. Ved Parkash and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-22-1991

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 26, Rule 14 and 14(2); Chandigarh (Sales of Sites and Buildings) Rules, 1960 - Rule 14; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21; Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 20

Reported in : (1991)99PLR606

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Kapur, Adv.

K.P. Bhandari, J.1. Petitioner's father owned House No. 50 Sector 10-A, Chandigarh, measuring 500 sq yards which property was inherited by the sons and daughters of the deceased. The respondents filed a suit for partition of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 1995

Amarjit Kaur Vs. Sarup Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-10-1995

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : (1995)111PLR726

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Kapur, Adv.

Sarojnei Saksena, J. 1. Appellant wife has assailed the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court in HM Case No. 43/13 of 1987 whereby her petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1980

Anil Kumar Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-21-1980

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code 1860 - Sections 34, 300, 302, 323 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 17(1980)DLT238

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Chaudhry and; S.K. Agarwal, advs

Prithvi Raj, J. (1) The appellant. Anil Kumar along with Smt. Shanti Devi wife of Ram Pershad and Lal Chand son of Maria Ram, were tried by Shri B.B. Gupta, Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 1971

NaraIn Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-07-1971

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311(2)

Reported in : ILR1972Delhi115

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Singh,; B.B. Kishore and; J.P. Gupta, Advs

D.K. Kapur, J.(1) The main question in this Regular Second appeal is whether the proviso to Article 311(2) of the Constitution is attracted to the facts of this case. The relevant part of the proviso reads...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 2000

M/S. Transport Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Mr. Karan Sehgal

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on : Jan-13-2000

Subject : Land Acquisition

Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The present appeal, filed by the appellant, named above, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act) is directed against order dated the 19th November,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial