Advanced Search Results
Jeet and anr. Vs. Poonam and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-18-2006
Motor Vehicles
2008ACJ38
Mahesh Grover, J.1. Aggrieved by the award dated 2.1.2006 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sonepat (hereinafter described as 'the Tribunal') in the M.A.C.T. Case No. 9 of 2005, the driver and the owner of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pappu and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-28-2006
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
III(2006)ACC309
Mr. V.K. Kapur
M.M. Kumar, J.1. The National Insurance Company is in appeal against the award dated 7.11.2005, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fast Track Court, Sonepat (for brevity, 'the Tribunal'). The Tribunal has found that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahinder Singh Vs. Manju and ors.
Delhi
Jan-08-1986
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
2(1986)ACC24
Mahinder Narain, J.1. On 6-4-1976 at about 1.45 p.m. a scooter was being driven by Sh. Krishan Lal Sawhney, along the Netaji Subhash Marg. He was proceeding from Darya Ganj side towards the Red Fort, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Satish Sharma Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another
Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
Nov-14-2000
Consumer
Dr. P.K. Vasudeva, Member: 1. This appeal has been filed Under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the order dated 11.5.2000 passed in Complaint Case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDalip Singh Gujar Singh Vs. R.P. Biswasj
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-30-1965
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 204(1A), 252, 252(2), 256 and 540
AIR1967P& H95; 1967CriLJ401
Puran Chand Mehta, Adv.
ORDERGurdev Singh, J.1. This is a petition for revision against the order of Shri V.K. Kapur, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, New Delhi, dated the 12th May 1964, whereby he permitted to respondent (complainant) to examine three witnesses who...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChander Parkash Vs. Ved Parkash and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-22-1991
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 26, Rule 14 and 14(2); Chandigarh (Sales of Sites and Buildings) Rules, 1960 - Rule 14; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21; Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 20
(1991)99PLR606
V.K. Kapur, Adv.
K.P. Bhandari, J.1. Petitioner's father owned House No. 50 Sector 10-A, Chandigarh, measuring 500 sq yards which property was inherited by the sons and daughters of the deceased. The respondents filed a suit for partition of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmarjit Kaur Vs. Sarup Singh
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-10-1995
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1)
(1995)111PLR726
V.K. Kapur, Adv.
Sarojnei Saksena, J. 1. Appellant wife has assailed the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court in HM Case No. 43/13 of 1987 whereby her petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnil Kumar Vs. the State
Delhi
Jan-21-1980
Criminal
Indian Penal Code 1860 - Sections 34, 300, 302, 323 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Sections 313
17(1980)DLT238
N.K. Chaudhry and; S.K. Agarwal, advs
Prithvi Raj, J. (1) The appellant. Anil Kumar along with Smt. Shanti Devi wife of Ram Pershad and Lal Chand son of Maria Ram, were tried by Shri B.B. Gupta, Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaraIn Singh Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Sep-07-1971
Service
Constitution of India - Article 311(2)
ILR1972Delhi115
S.C. Singh,; B.B. Kishore and; J.P. Gupta, Advs
D.K. Kapur, J.(1) The main question in this Regular Second appeal is whether the proviso to Article 311(2) of the Constitution is attracted to the facts of this case. The relevant part of the proviso reads...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Transport Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Mr. Karan Sehgal
Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Jan-13-2000
Land Acquisition
Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The present appeal, filed by the appellant, named above, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as âthe Act) is directed against order dated the 19th November,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »