Advanced Search Results

Chunmun Vs. District, Magistrate, Sonbhadra and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 12(1), 95(1) and 110; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules, 1947 - Rules 47 and 47A; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhan, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997 - Rules 3, 3(1), (2), (3), (5) and (6), 4, 4(1), 5, 7 and 8; Constitution of India - Articles 4(2) and 243B, C, G and H; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC1892; (1998)3UPLBEC2061

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Jaiswal, Adv.

S.R. Singh, J.1. Impugned herein is the order dated 29.5.1998 passed by the District Magistrate. Sonbhadra in purported exercise of powers under the proviso to clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section (95) of the U....

Anima Gupta Vs. Tarun Kumar Gupta

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Acts : Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR2003All76

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Jaiswal, Adv.

ORDERB.K. Rathi, J.1. The opposite party moved an application under Section 25 of Guardians & Wards Act read with Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act for appointment of guardian and custody of minor...

Narendra Singh Alias Natey Singh and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161

Reported in : 2003CriLJ205

Advocate for Appellant : G.S. Chaturvedi, ;V.K. Jaiswal and ;A.D. Giri, Advs.

S.K. Agarwal, J.1. These two criminal appeals, being Criminal Appeal No. 829 of 1996 (filed on behalf of Bansh Bahadur Singh and Jat Pratap Singh alias Ram Pratap Singh) and Criminal Appeal No. 776 of 1996...

Panch Lal Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 12C; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Election of Members, Pradhan and Up Pradhan) Rules, 1994 - Rules 88, 91, 91(2) and 93

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC853

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Khare and ;V.K. Jaiswal, Advs.

Ashok Bhushan, J.1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare senior advocate assisted by Sri V, K. Jaiswal advocate for the petitioner and Sri Vidya Sagar appearing for the contesting respondent No. 6.2. By this writ petition the petitioner...

Webbing and Belting Factory (P.) Ltd., Ghaziabad Vs. Vinod Kumar and O ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 4; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC3127

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Tiwari, Adv.

D. K. Seth. J. 1. Leave is granted to convert the petition into one under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.2. The order dated 17th August,, 1999 passed by the learned Additional District XVth Court....

State of U.P. Vs. Rajendra Singh Chaudhary, Advocate

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 11, 17 and 19

Reported in : 2000CriLJ919; (1999)3UPLBEC2054

Advocate for Appellant : A.G.A.

Ravi S. Dhavan and B. Dikshit, JJ.1. The District Judge, Ghaziabad, has made a reference to the High Court on the basis of the report submitted by A. K. Singh Xth Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad,...

Shiv Raj and Others Vs. Addl. Collector (Supplies), Ghaziabad and Othe ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 117, 122B, 122B(4F), 132, 194 and 195; Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 14

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC730

Advocate for Appellant : Janardan Sahai, Adv.

Sudhir Narain, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 25.11.1997 passed by the Additional Collector, respondent No. 1, allowing the revision filed by respondent Nos. 3 and 4.2. The facts, in brief, are...

M/S. Bombay Trading Co. Vs. M/S. Jai Santoshi Maa Enterprises

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

By this Summons for Judgment, the Plaintiff seeks that judgment be entered for the Plaintiff in this suit against the Defendant for Rs.11,32,569.54 and for interest and costs. 2. The suit is based on an invoice...

M/S. Bombay Trading Co. Vs. M/S. Jai Santoshi Maa Enterprises

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

By this Summons for Judgment, the Plaintiff seeks that judgment be entered for the Plaintiff in this suit against the Defendant for Rs.11,32,569.54 and for interest and costs. 2. The suit is based on an invoice...

Uma Kant Mishra and ors. Vs. Allahabad Development Authority and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC1735

Advocate for Appellant : Deepak Jaiswal and ;V.K. Jaiswal, Advs.

ORDERM. Katju and Prakash Krishna, JJ.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The petitioners have prayed for a writ of certiorari to quash the orders dated 18th October, 2002, Annexures-5, 6 to 10 to the writ...