Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v h kamat · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.053 seconds)

Apr 09 1957

Raghunath Hari Deshpande Vs. Kashinath Ramchandra Deshpande

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-09-1957

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Laws Act, 1948 - Sections 29, 85, 89 and 89(2)

Reported in : AIR1958Bom223; (1957)59BOMLR691

Advocate for Appellant : V.H. Kamat, Adv.

1. This is a second appeal arising from execution proceedings of a consent decree passed on 7th of November 1946. By that compromise decree the parties agreed that the respondent was to remain in possession until...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 1955

Tatuba Laxman Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-30-1955

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 124; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1956Bom475; 1956CriLJ874

Advocate for Appellant : V.H. Kamat, Adv.

ORDER1. The accused Tatuba Laxman was charged with having committed an offence under Section 124, Bombay Police Act, 1951, in criminal case No. 106/P of 1955 in the Court of the Presidency Magistrate, Fifth Court, Dadar,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 1951

In Re: Parashuram Laljishet Gujar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-05-1951

Subject : CriminalCommercial

Acts : Debt Law; Bombay Money-lenders Act, 1947 - Sections 1, 5, 10, 25, 25(2) and 34; Bombay Money-lenders Act, 1946 - Sections 5 and 25(3)

Reported in : AIR1952Bom276; (1952)54BOMLR160; ILR1952Bom914

Advocate for Appellant : M.B. Chitre and V.H. Kamat, Advs.;H.M. Choksi, Govt. Pleader

ORDER[1] By this revision application the accused challenges his conviction under Sections 5 and 25(3), Bombay Money-lenders Act, 1946. The facts are not in dispute. Between 6-1-1948, and 24-10-1948, the accused had several money-lending transactions in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Sep 11 1953

Durgadas Tulsiram Sood Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-11-1953

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 196A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 120-B, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 511; Criminal Justice Act, 1948; Larceny Act, 1916 - Sections 32

Reported in : AIR1955Bom82; (1954)56BOMLR188; 1955CriLJ289; ILR1954Bom554

Advocate for Appellant : Ajit R. Malhotra, ;K.A. Somjee and ;V.H. Kamat, Advs.

Vyas, J. 1. These are two appeals by accused Nos. 1 and 2. Appeal No. 672 is an appeal by accused No. 2 and Appeal No. 807 is an appeal by accused No. 1. These are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 1952

Haji Mahomed Haji Alli Mahomed Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-09-1952

Subject : TenancyCriminal

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 24, 24(2), 24(3) and 24(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 114 and 426

Reported in : AIR1952Bom399; (1952)54BOMLR426; ILR1953Bom12

Advocate for Appellant : A.A. Peerbhoy and ;V.H. Kamat, Advs.

FACTS1. One Haji Mahomed Haji Alli Mahomed (accused No. 1) who was one of the trustees of a trust, which owned a building in Narayan Dhuru Street, put up an unauthorised construction on the ground floor...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 1950

Abdul Rahiman ShamsooddIn Vs. Emperor

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-17-1950

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay District Police Act, 1890 - Sections 46(3); Constitution of India - Articles 13 and 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1950Bom374; (1950)52BOMLR558

Advocate for Appellant : M.B. Vora, ;V.H. Kamat and ;P.T. Lewa, Advs.

Chagla, C.J.1. By this application an order made by the Additional District Magistrate of Thana dated 26th April 1949, is being challenged. Though the order directs the petitioner to remove himself from the State of Bombay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 1956

Bapurao Dhondiba Jagtap Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-31-1956

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(3), 226, 228 and 245; Bombay Police Act, 1951- Sections 37, 37(1) and 37(3); Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 21

Reported in : AIR1956Bom300; (1956)58BOMLR418; 1956CriLJ598; ILR1956Bom753

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Kotwal and ;V.H. Kamat, Advs.

Chagla, C.J. 1. The petitioner has been charge-sheeted in the Court of the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate for having contravened an order passed by the Commissioner of Police under Section 37(3), Bombay Police Act, on 12-11-1955,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1949

Kishori Shetty Vs. Emperor

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-11-1949

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Abkari Act, 1878 - Sectcions 14B(1), 43 and 45A; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : AIR1950Bom221; (1950)52BOMLR29

Advocate for Appellant : K.L. Gauba and ;V.H. Kamat, Advs.

Chagla, C.J.1. This is an appeal from an order passed by the learned Presidency Magistrate 5th Court, Bombay, convicting the accused under Section 43 (1), Abkari Act and sentencing her to rigorous imprisonment for three months...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
Next ›

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.