Advanced Search Results

State of Maharashtra and anr. Vs. Baliram Girdhar Patil

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 11, 15, 18, 23(1A), 23(2), 28, 30(1) and 34; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 30(1)

Reported in : 2006(6)MhLj82

Advocate for Appellant : V.H. Dighe, A.G.P.

S.B. Deshmukh, J.1. These First Appeals arise out of two common judgments delivered by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalgaon, in two groups of Land Acquisition References. First group was consisting of Land Acquisition...

Akole Taluka Education Society and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Common Judgment: (M.S. Sonak, J.) 1. Rule in each of the petitions. With the consent of and at the request of the learned counsel for the parties, Rule is disposed of finally. 2. The learned counsel...

Hariharrao Vishwanathrao Bhosikar Vs. Datta Anandrao Pawar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Local Authority Members (Disqualification) Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 4, 5, 7 and 9; Representation of the People Act; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Constitution (fifty second Amendment) Act, 1985; Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samities Act, 1961 - Sections 57(1); Maharashtra Municipalities Act; Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Rules, 1987 - Rules 2, 3, 3(5), 5, 6, 6(3), 6(4), 7, 7(4) and 8 ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10; Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification (Amendment) Rules, 1997

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR702; 2005(4)MhLj211

Advocate for Appellant : V.J. Dixit, ;B.L. Sagar-Killarikar and ;A.S. Golegaonkar, Advs.

A.B. Naik, J.1. All the four writ petitions involve common question of law, though filed by different petitioners, can be disposed of by the this common judgment. All the petitions are filed under Articles 226 and...

Bhagwanrao S/O. Vishwanath Vyawhare and anr. Vs. Sau. Sunita W/O. Gopi ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27 - Order 43, Rule 27; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rules 36, 36(1), 36(2), 37 and 38; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR68; 2007(6)BomCR275; 2008(1)MhLj417

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah, Sr. Adv. for; N.C. Garud, Adv.

R.M. Savant, J.1. Rule, with the consent of the parties made returnable forthwith and heard. 2. The short question that arises for consideration in this writ petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution...

Naresh S/O Baliram Sonwane Vs. Kishor S/O Kashinath Patil and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 10, 11 and 12; Evidence Act - Sections 34, 35, 73 and 74; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR759; 2007(6)MhLj801

Advocate for Appellant : B.R. Wanna, Adv.

R.M. Savant, J.1. Rule, made returnable forthwith and with the consent of parties, heard.2. This petition impugns the order dated 12-3-2007 passed by the IInd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalgaon in Reference No. 1 of...

Bhimrao Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through C.B.I. Nagpur

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Satej S. Jadhav

Oral Judgment: 1. Being dissatisfied with the judgment and order of conviction, passed by the learned Special Judge, Jalna, dated 17.10.2000, in Special Case No. 15 of 1996, by which the appellant is convicted for the...

Sitabai Kerba Deotarse and ors. Vs. Anil Sahebrao Deotarse and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 39 and 39(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 2A and 11;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 2A and 11

Reported in : 2006(5)BomCR833; 2006(2)MhLj65

Advocate for Appellant : A.L. Barhate, Adv.

S.B. Deshmukh, J.1. Heard Mr. Barhate, learned Counsel for the petitioners; Mr. P. F. Patni, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 and Mr. V. H. Dighe, learned AGP for respondent Nos. 5 to 7, respondent Nos....

Vishwas and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra Represented by the See ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. 2. By the present Writ Petition, the petitioners are challenging the summonses as accused, issued against them by the learned Judicial Magistrate...

Manik and Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. A.N.Nagargoje

Oral Judgment: 1. By the present appeal, the appellants are challenging their conviction and sentence as imposed upon them by the learned Special Judge (Anti Corruption), Aurangabad, dated 1.2.2000 in Special Case No. 12 of 1994....

Samadhan Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. C.R.Deshpande

1. By the present Revision, the applicant is challenging the judgment and order, passed by the Sessions Judge, Dhule, dated 16.11.2013 in Criminal Appeal No.48 of 2010, thereby the learned lower Appellate Court, though partly allowed...