Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v g palshikar · Page 1 of about 518 results (0.068 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 13 1987

Arvind Laxmanrao Kinge Vs. State of Maharashtra, Urban Development Pub ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-13-1987

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Admission to Post Graduate Courses in Medical Colleges Rules - Rule 5; Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 33; Constitution of India - Article 162

Reported in : 1988(1)BomCR280; 1988MhLJ575

Advocate for Appellant : P.C. Marpakwar, Adv. in W.P. in 1707/86, ; S.A. Bobde, Adv. in W.P. 500/86, 1592/86, 1706/86 and 2356/86, ; V.G. Palshikar, Adv. in W.P. 1579/86, ;S.V. Manohar, Adv. in W.P. 1687/86, ; J.P. Pendsey, A

H.W. Dhabe, J.1. All these writ petitions can conveniently be disposed of by this common judgment Broadly speaking, these writ petitions fall into two groups. The first group is of writ petitions in which the petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 2004

Yashwant Vasudeo Natu and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-08-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2004(4)ALLMR314; 2004(6)BomCR203; 2005(1)MhLj417

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Apte, Adv.

V.G. Palshikar, J.1. By this petition, the petitioner claims revision of his pay to the scale of Rs. 700 to 1600 with effect from 6-11-1997 on the ground that similar scale revision was granted to other...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2003

The Court on It's Own Motion Vs. Sou. Jayashree Khadilkar Pandey,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-11-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Commision of Enquiries Act, 1952

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)129; 2003BomCR(Cri)1405

Advocate for Appellant : N.P. Bapat and ;Hemangi Prabhu for the Contemnor ;Nilkanth khadilkar and ;N.P. Bapat, Adv. and ;G.V. Limaye for Contemnor ;Jayshree Khadilkar Pandey;Shekhar Naphade, Senior Counsel (Amicus Curie)

Palshikar, J.The facts giving arise to this suo motu proceedings under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 are as follows: 2. That the Government of Maharashtra had appointed one man commission under the Commission of Enquiries Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 19 2008

Shrikant S/O Uttamrao Bhutekar, Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through I ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-19-2008

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2(15), 2(19), 6, 23, 26, 38, 42, 43, 46, 49, 126(1), 126(2), 126(3), 127, 136, 146 and 152; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 11A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 21

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR3360; 2009(2)MhLj673

Advocate for Appellant : A.B. Kale, Adv. holding for ;P.V. Jadhavar, Adv.

F.I. Rebello, J. 1. The petitioners have filed present petition contending that they are the owners of the land admeasuring 1 H. 82 R. and 81 R. from Survey No. 117 situated at Osmanabad city. In...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 1997

Smt. Sheela Wd/O Vijay Choudhary and ors. Vs. Central Bank of India an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-18-1997

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1998(4)ALLMR173; (1998)100BOMLR609

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. M/s. Ajay Industry, A-14, M.I.D.C. Area, Wardha, through its proprietor Shri Vijay Wamanrao Choudhari, was sanctioned cash credit hypothecation limit of Rs. 95.000/- on 30.1.1986 by the Central Bank of India, Branch Office...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2001

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Sushil Kumar Natani

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-14-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants (Dying while in Service) Rules, 1975 - Rule 5; Constitution of India - Articles 16 and 311-A

Reported in : 2001(3)WLC533; 2003(1)WLN545

Advocate for Appellant : Mohd. Refiq, Addl. Adv. General

Lakshmanan, C.J. (1). Heard Mr. Mohd. Rafiq, for the appellants; and Mr. V.D. Gathala, for the respondent. (2). The State of Rajasthan, through the Finance Commissioner-cum-Secretary to the Government of Rajasthan and two others are the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 2005

Ashok Gyanchand Vohra Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-22-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 1 to 4, 5, 5(1), 6, 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 9(3), 9(4), 10, 11, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 23(1), 23(2), 24, 25, 29, 50 and 58(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 2(2), 3, 4, 4(2), 6, 9, 24, 25, 26, 36, 39, 154 to 176, 190, 190(1), 193, 195, 197, 197(1), 200 to 203, 204, 340 and 438; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 143, 147, 149, 166, 182, 191, 192, 193, 195, 196, 218 and 323; Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 29, 29(1) and 50; Terrorists and Dangerous Activities Act; Maharashtra Control of Organized Crimes Act, 1990; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 14(1), 20A(1) and 20A(2); narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Prevention of

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1270; 2006(3)MhLj163

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Agarwal, ;A.M. Sarogi and ;Girish Agarwal, Advs., ;Asmita Sarangdhar, Adv. in Cri. Application No. 3172 of 2004, ;Sushilkumar, Sr. Counsel, ;S.K. Jain, ;Rajendra Shirodkar, ;H. Jain, ;Lalit Chava

V.G. Palshikar, Acg. C.J.1. The above writ petitions were heard by us and the judgment was reserved. Then I prepared the judgment of the Bench in November, 2005 and circulated it to my learned colleagues on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1999

Nirmal Kumar Vs. R.S.E.B. Falna and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-06-1999

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1999(3)WLC396; 1999(1)WLN504

B.J. Shethna, J.1. Petitioner Nirmal Kumar had initially filed this writ petition through his learned Counsel Shri R.S. Sharma, which was straightaway admitted by my learned brother V.G. Palshikar, J. on 14.7.1998 and notices were ordered...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 1984

Narendra Keshrichand Fuladi and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-28-1984

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : (1985)IILLJ24Bom; 1985MhLJ1

Deshpande, J.1. By these two petitions, the petitioners pray for striking down the amendment to S. 2(4) of the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 (Bombay Act LXXIX of 1948), effected by S. 2(b) of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 1977

Popatlal Motichand Shah Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-12-1977

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1978CriLJ249; 1977MhLJ855

ORDERGinwala, J.1. This revision application has been filed against the order convicting the applicant of the offence Under Section 85(1) of the Bombay Prohibition Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and sentencing him to undergo...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial