Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v g hegde · Page 1 of about 2 results (0.075 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 27 1987

Govind Janardhan Mahale Vs. Ramdas Keshav Kamath

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-27-1987

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 67, 69, 69(1), 69(2) and 90

Reported in : ILR1987KAR2617

Advocate for Appellant : B.V. Krisnnaswamy Rao, Adv.

Kulkarni, J.1. This is an appeal by the Judgment Debtor against the order dated 4th April 1978 passed by the Civil Judge, Uttara Hanmada, Karwar, in Miscellaneous Case No. 9 of 1972 dismissing the same.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 1993

A. Bhaskar and Another Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and Others, Etc.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-18-1993

Subject : Property

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 21, 22, 22A; Karnataka Amendment Act, 1976 - Sections 15 and 22A; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 95; Karnataka Regularisation of Unauthorised Constructions in Urban Areas Act, 1991 - Sections 3; Karnataka Village Panchayats and Local Boards Act, 1959 - Sections 42 and 210, Rule 35; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 20(1), 26, 28 and 72; Land Reforms Act, 1974; Karnataka Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1966; Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4; Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 - Sections 17 and 36; Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites Rules), 1984

Reported in : AIR1994Kant209; ILR1993KAR3103; 1993(4)KarLJ275

Advocate for Appellant : V.G. Hegde, ;T.V. Vijay Raghavan ;(M.R. Narayana & Co.), ;R. Bhaskara, ;S. M. Hegde, ;S.B. Mukkannappa ;(M/s. Jaypee Associates), ;S. Chennaraya, ;T.S. Ramachandra, ;G. Raikar and ;S. Shankaranar

ORDER1. In these writ petitions, the petitioners question the legality and validity of two Circulars dated 9-2-1993 and 24-5-1993 issued by the Revenue Department of the State Government. In most of the petitions only the Circular...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial