Advanced Search Results

Rajendra Pandurang Pagare and Sk. AnisoddhIn Sk. KamroddhIn Vs. the St ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999 - Sections 6, 10, 10(3), 10(4), 10(6), 14, 16 and 27; Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 2001 - Sections 10(6); Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 73A; Service Recruitment Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 15(4), 16, 16(2), 16(4), 38, 39, 46, 226, 227 and 340

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3223; 2009(4)MhLj961

Advocate for Appellant : R.R. Mantri, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 5266 of 2008, ;S.B. Talekar, Adv. holding for P.R. Katneshwarkar, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 6100 of 2008 and ;V.D. Sapkal, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 7185 of 2008

ORDERB.R. Gavai, J.1. The following issue is referred to this Larger Bench:Whether project affected persons can be appointed without advertising the posts, ignoring their qualifications and merit.2. Writ Petition No. 7472/2007 was filed in this court...

Shriram Nagordhar Mahajan and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(2A) and 3(42); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 143, 147, 149, 307, 323, 341, 379, 395, 425, 426, 427, 504 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 149, 200, 202, 399, 401 and 401(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - 1898 - Sections 439(2)

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2216

Advocate for Appellant : V.D. Sapkal, Adv.

ORDERB.R. Gavai, J.1. By order dated 23rd February, 2006, I have allowed the application by quashing and setting aside the order passed by the learned. IV Ad hoc Additional District Judge, Aurangabad dated 17th December, 2005...

Sow. Swati SachIn Mahajan (Pagare) Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156, 156(1), 156(3), 190, 193, 198 and 198(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 109, 494 and 495

Reported in : I(2008)DMC79

Advocate for Appellant : V.D. Sapkal, Adv.

B.R. Gavai, J.1. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent.2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service on behalf of the respondent.3. Being aggrieved by the order dated 2nd February 2007, passed by the learned Judicial...

Smt. Gyarasidevi Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(Bom)382

Advocate for Appellant : V.D. Hon, for the Petitioner R.G. Deo & V.D. Sapkal, for the Respondents

ORDERBy The Court:We have heard Mr. V.D. Hon, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.G. Deo, learned standing counsel for the Union of India as well as Mr. V. D, Sapkal, learned Addl. Government Pleader...

Dayanand Vs. Asha

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125(1) and 125(4)

Reported in : I(2005)DMC228

Advocate for Appellant : V.D. Sapkal, Adv.

P.B. Gaikwad, J.1. The applicant Dayanand S/o Sonu Ghodke filed present application to set aside the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate (first class) Shrigonda dated 30.11.1996 in Maintenance Application No. 147/1995, which is later on...

Anantbhushan Murlidhar Kanade and anr. Vs. Vikas Kashinath Navandar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Rent Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 10 - Order 15A, Rule 1 - Order 25A, Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR79; 2005(4)MhLj583

Advocate for Appellant : V.D. Sapkal, Adv.

Zotting D.S., J. 1. Heard Shri V.D. Sapkal, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Shri Arunchandra Kapadia, learned Counsel for the respondent.2. Rule. Rule made returnable forth with. Taken up for hearing by consent of both...

Maimune Banu Hamidali Khan and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 16, 17(3)A, 23(1)A and 31(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 300A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : 2001(3)ALLMR449; 2001(3)BomCR529

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Bhapkar, Adv. in W.P. No. 199 of 1998, ;R.L. Chintewar, Adv. in W.P. No. 200 of 1998, ;A.B. Kale, Adv. in W.P. No. 2674 of 2000, ;B.L. Sagar Killarikar, Adv. in W.P. No. 2786 of 2000, ;R.K. Ashti

B.H. Maralapalle, J.1. In all the these petitions, a common question of law is involved and hence, these petitions are disposed off by a common judgment.2. In Writ Petition No. 199/1998, agricultural land belonging to the...

Rukhminibai Pratisthan and Another Vs. Ravindra and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Admit. 3. By consent of the learned counsel appearing for all the parties, we have heard these Letter Patent Appeals finally. 4. These appeals under...

Radhabai and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretar ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

S.S. Shinde, J. 1. Heard. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, and heard with the consent of the parties. 3. Both these Writ Petitions take exception to the order / Government Resolution dated 30th May, 2013...

Baburao S/O Rajaram Shinde Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 16(4), 338, 340, 341 and 342; Constitution of India (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950

Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR625; 2003(1)BomCR401

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Choudhary, ;A.H. Joshi, ;V.G. Sakolkar, ;Sagar Killarikar, ;Irpatgire and ;Anil Gaikwad, Advs. (appointed as Amicus Curiae);A.S. Golegaonkar, Adv. ; A.M. Sawant and ;Manish Navander, Advs.

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. The scope of this petition, though initially limited to one particular issue regarding 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe, has subsequently been widened so as to consider the issues arising out of the MandalCommission Report and...