Advanced Search Results

K. Bhaskara Rao Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : A.P. State and Subordinate Services Rules - Rule 33(c)

Reported in : 1987Supp(1)SCC312

A.P. Sen and; v. Balakrishnan Eradi, JJ.1. Special leave granted. Arguments heard.2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are not satisfied that all the relevant aspects have been taken into consideration by the Government...

Mohammed Nachiar Vs. the District Registrar, Chidambaram

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 31, 33, 33(1) and 62

Reported in : AIR1983Mad19

Advocate for Appellant : T.V. Balakrishnan, Adv.

1. The petitioner herein presented a document of the year 1978 to the Sub-Registrar, Portonovo, claiming that she was the owner of certain properties in Sirkali and Chidambaram taluks and in 1965, she had created a...

Mohamed Nachiar Vs. the District Registrar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1982)1MLJ415

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. T.V. Balakrishnan

ORDERT. Sathiadev, J.1. The petitioner herein presented a document of the year 1978 to the Sub-Registrar, Portonovo, claiming that she was the owner of certain properties in Sirkali and Chidambaram taluks and in 1965, she had...

M.R. Jayaram Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143, 147, 148, 155, 155(1), 155(1), 159, 246, 246(1) and 247

Reported in : [1984]147ITR807(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T.V. Balakrishnan, Adv.

Balasubrahmanyan, J.1. The assessee in this income-tax reference was originally a partner of a registered firm called 'Sri Venkateswara Bus Union'. He had a 1/4th share in the firm. He retired from the partnership with effect...

Ramanuja Mudali Vs. M. Gangan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96(4)

Reported in : AIR1984Mad103

Advocate for Appellant : T.V. Balakrishnan, Adv.

1. This petition coming on for hearing on this day the Court delivered the following Judgment:_2. The defendant is the revision petitioner. The plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 3,000/- by way of damages...

Selvalammal Vs. Sumathi Ammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Agriculturists' Relief Act, 1938 - Sections 19 and 20

Reported in : AIR1983Mad294; (1983)2MLJ146

Advocate for Appellant : T.V. Balakrishnan, Adv.

ORDER1. The decree-holder in O. S. No.1355 of 1971 on the file of the District Munsif, Kallakurichi, is the petitioner in this revision. The respondent herein is the judgment-debtor. The judgment debtor filed an application I....

Vengammal and anr. Vs. Ramachandran (Minor) by Mother Jayalakshmi Amma ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court Fee Act, 1955 - Sections 66, 66(1), 67, 68, 69 and 70; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 18; Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 13, 14 and 15; Madras Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR1971Mad490; (1971)2MLJ280

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. T. V. Balakrishnan

Venkataraman, J.1. In this case an appeal memorandum was filed against a particular decision of Sub Court, Vellore, in partition suit. A court-fee of Rs. 200 which was the correct court-fee was affixed to the Memorandum...

Ragaiya Bagavathar and anr. Vs. Kesava Bagavathar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Registration Act, 1866 - Sections 17, 17(1) and 49; Indian Registration (Amendment) Act, 1871; Indian Registration (Amendment) Act, 1877 ; Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Reported in : AIR1972Mad324; (1971)2MLJ387

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. T. V. Balakrishnan

1. Though the value involved in this second appeal is a very small one, yet it raises an interesting question of law. Defendants 1 and 2 in O.S. 441 of 1965 on the file of the...

Chinnaswami Mudaliar and anr. Vs. Rajalakshmi Ammal and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1970)1MLJ195

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. T.V. Balakrishnan

K.S. Venkataraman, J.1. This is an appeal against an order of remand. Defendants 1 and 2 are the appellants. They are brothers. The second defendant purchased the property in question, a small house site of 2...

Eldee Velvet and Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Anand Ram Whigh (Dead) by Lr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Section 22

Reported in : 1989Supp(2)SCC409

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Salve

A.P. Sen and; v. Balakrishnan Eradi, JJ.1. We heard Shri Salve, learned counsel for the appellant at quite some length. The appeal arises out of a suit for specific performance brought by the appellant as the...