Advanced Search Results
Mahadeo Gopal Mone Vs. Rameshwar Sadashiv Mone and ors.
Mumbai
Jun-28-1967
FamilyProperty
Hindu Law; Transfer of Property - Sections 51
AIR1968Bom323; (1968)70BOMLR89; 1968MhLJ407
K.V. Joshi, Adv.
(1) This is a second appeal by the widow of the plaintiff who succeeded substantially in the trial court but lost to some extent in the appellate court. The short facts necessary for the disposal of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Ideal Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pappu Poojary and ors.
Karnataka
Apr-14-1972
Company
Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 22; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95, 95(2), 95(3), 96 and 96(1)
[1974]44CompCas6(Kar); (1972)2MysLJ74
B.V. Balaji, Adv.
Chandrashekhar, J.1. Has the Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act jurisdiction make against the insurer of a motor vehicle, an award of compensation for death of, or injury to, a person in an automobile accident in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinesh Chand vs.the Management of Rukmani Devi Jaipuria Public School ...
Delhi
Feb-18-2019
Education
Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Mr. Nitin Jain, Dr. M. Y. Khan, Mr. Santosh Kumar Sahani, Mr. V. Balaji, Ms. Sripradha Krishan, Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Mr. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. h February , 2019 + Pronounced on:18. h February, 2019 LPA1992018 & CM APPL. 14304/2018 BHARTI SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sadhna Payal vs.the Management of Rukmani Devi Jaipuria Public School ...
Delhi
Feb-18-2019
Education
Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Mr. Nitin Jain, Dr. M. Y. Khan, Mr. Santosh Kumar Sahani, Mr. V. Balaji, Ms. Sripradha Krishan, Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Mr. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. h February , 2019 + Pronounced on:18. h February, 2019 LPA1992018 & CM APPL. 14304/2018 BHARTI SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharti Sharma vs.the Managment of Rukmani Devi Jaipuria Public School ...
Delhi
Feb-18-2019
Education
Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Mr. Nitin Jain, Dr. M. Y. Khan, Mr. Santosh Kumar Sahani, Mr. V. Balaji, Ms. Sripradha Krishan, Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Mr. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. h February , 2019 + Pronounced on:18. h February, 2019 LPA1992018 & CM APPL. 14304/2018 BHARTI SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Wahab and ors. Vs. Ramakrishniah
Karnataka
Mar-31-1950
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151, 152 and 153 - Order 9, Rules 8 and 9 - Order 22, Rules 3, 5 and 11(2) - Order 28, Rule 2
AIR1954Kant65; AIR1954Mys65; ILR1953KAR521
B.V. Balaji, Adv.
ORDER1. The petitioners before this Court are the respondents in R. A. No. 147 of 44-45 on the file of the First Additional Subordinate Judge, Bangalore. The first respondent herein is one Ramakrishnaiah who died on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG. Rajamani Vs. Petchimuthu,
Chennai
Dec-10-2002
ConsumerConsumer
Constitution of India - Article 227
(2003)1MLJ432
V. Balaji, Adv.
ORDERR. Balasubramanian, J.1. Originally there were six respondents. However, the records show that respondents 2 to 6 had been given up. Therefore the revision survives only against respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 1 had been served...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKirtilal Jivabhai Vs. Chunilal Manilal
Mumbai
Apr-12-1945
Civil
AIR1946Bom27; (1945)47BOMLR728
Chagla, J.1. This is an appeal from a judgment of Mr. Justice Kania, and the question that arises for determination is1 whether a decree is capable of execution or is barred by limitation. It was an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamarbai and ors. Vs. Badrinarayan and anr.
Mumbai
Jul-27-1976
Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2 and 23; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 27, 27(2), 28, 31 and 34; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 84; Criminal Law
AIR1977Bom228; (1976)78BOMLR579; 1977MhLJ115
M.G. karmali, Adv.
Vaidya, J.64. The important question to be decided in this appeal is whether the plaintiff could take an advantage of the immoral relations which he claimed to have established between himself and defendant No. 1, even...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJivaji Sambhaji Kambli Vs. Fakir Sabaji Kambli
Mumbai
Jan-16-1912
Civil
(1912)14BOMLR395
Chandavarkar, J.1. The first question is what is the relief which the plaintiff has asked for by his plaint in this suit and, secondly, whether that relief is barred by the provisions of the Vatan Act.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »