Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v balaji · Page 1 of about 569 results (0.236 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 28 1967

Mahadeo Gopal Mone Vs. Rameshwar Sadashiv Mone and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-28-1967

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Transfer of Property - Sections 51

Reported in : AIR1968Bom323; (1968)70BOMLR89; 1968MhLJ407

Advocate for Appellant : K.V. Joshi, Adv.

(1) This is a second appeal by the widow of the plaintiff who succeeded substantially in the trial court but lost to some extent in the appellate court. The short facts necessary for the disposal of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 14 1972

Hindustan Ideal Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pappu Poojary and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-14-1972

Subject : Company

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 22; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95, 95(2), 95(3), 96 and 96(1)

Reported in : [1974]44CompCas6(Kar); (1972)2MysLJ74

Advocate for Appellant : B.V. Balaji, Adv.

Chandrashekhar, J.1. Has the Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act jurisdiction make against the insurer of a motor vehicle, an award of compensation for death of, or injury to, a person in an automobile accident in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2019

Dinesh Chand vs.the Management of Rukmani Devi Jaipuria Public School ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2019

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Mr. Nitin Jain, Dr. M. Y. Khan, Mr. Santosh Kumar Sahani, Mr. V. Balaji, Ms. Sripradha Krishan, Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Mr. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. h February , 2019 + Pronounced on:18. h February, 2019 LPA1992018 & CM APPL. 14304/2018 BHARTI SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 18 2019

Sadhna Payal vs.the Management of Rukmani Devi Jaipuria Public School ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2019

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Mr. Nitin Jain, Dr. M. Y. Khan, Mr. Santosh Kumar Sahani, Mr. V. Balaji, Ms. Sripradha Krishan, Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Mr. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. h February , 2019 + Pronounced on:18. h February, 2019 LPA1992018 & CM APPL. 14304/2018 BHARTI SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2019

Bharti Sharma vs.the Managment of Rukmani Devi Jaipuria Public School ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2019

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Mr. Nitin Jain, Dr. M. Y. Khan, Mr. Santosh Kumar Sahani, Mr. V. Balaji, Ms. Sripradha Krishan, Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Mr. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. h February , 2019 + Pronounced on:18. h February, 2019 LPA1992018 & CM APPL. 14304/2018 BHARTI SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1950

Abdul Wahab and ors. Vs. Ramakrishniah

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-31-1950

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151, 152 and 153 - Order 9, Rules 8 and 9 - Order 22, Rules 3, 5 and 11(2) - Order 28, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1954Kant65; AIR1954Mys65; ILR1953KAR521

Advocate for Appellant : B.V. Balaji, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioners before this Court are the respondents in R. A. No. 147 of 44-45 on the file of the First Additional Subordinate Judge, Bangalore. The first respondent herein is one Ramakrishnaiah who died on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 2002

G. Rajamani Vs. Petchimuthu,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-10-2002

Subject : ConsumerConsumer

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : (2003)1MLJ432

Advocate for Appellant : V. Balaji, Adv.

ORDERR. Balasubramanian, J.1. Originally there were six respondents. However, the records show that respondents 2 to 6 had been given up. Therefore the revision survives only against respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 1 had been served...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 1945

Kirtilal Jivabhai Vs. Chunilal Manilal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-12-1945

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1946Bom27; (1945)47BOMLR728

Chagla, J.1. This is an appeal from a judgment of Mr. Justice Kania, and the question that arises for determination is1 whether a decree is capable of execution or is barred by limitation. It was an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 1976

Kamarbai and ors. Vs. Badrinarayan and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-27-1976

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2 and 23; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 27, 27(2), 28, 31 and 34; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 84; Criminal Law

Reported in : AIR1977Bom228; (1976)78BOMLR579; 1977MhLJ115

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. karmali, Adv.

Vaidya, J.64. The important question to be decided in this appeal is whether the plaintiff could take an advantage of the immoral relations which he claimed to have established between himself and defendant No. 1, even...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 1912

Jivaji Sambhaji Kambli Vs. Fakir Sabaji Kambli

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-16-1912

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1912)14BOMLR395

Chandavarkar, J.1. The first question is what is the relief which the plaintiff has asked for by his plaint in this suit and, secondly, whether that relief is barred by the provisions of the Vatan Act.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial