Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v balachandran · Page 1 of about 319 results (0.221 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 19 1999

K.T. Kunjumon Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-19-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)155CTR(Mad)341

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. Balachandran

ORDERM. V. BALASUBRAMANIAN, J.The writ petition in WP No. 1425 of 1999 is filed against the order passed by the CIT Central-1, Chennai-34, dt. 18th Nov., 1998, and the prayer in the writ petition is to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1999

K.T. Kunjumon Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-19-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132 and 158BC

Reported in : [1999]239ITR782(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : V. Balachandran, Adv.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. The writ petition in W. P. No. 1425 of 1999 is filed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-1, Chennai 34, dated November 18, 1998, and the prayer in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2000

P. Ramanathan Vs. Ito

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-17-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)170CTR(Mad)245

Advocate for Appellant : V. Balachandran, for the Assessee Mrs. Chitra Venkatraman, for the Revenue

ORDERR. Jayasimha Babu, J.The submission of the petitioner is that notice having been issued as provided for in rule 119(3), the interest under section 220(2) cannot be taken note of for the purpose of determination of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 30 2022

State of Kerala vs Dr.Kavitha J.B.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-30-2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 9TH CHAITHRA, 1944 OP(KAT) NO. 11 OF 2022...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 2021

Sindhu B. vs V.Balachandran

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-26-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 5TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 10359 OF 2015 PETITIONER: SINDHU B. W/O. JAYAKUMAR, GITA AVENUE,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2015

Secretary Tamilnadu Public Service Comm Vs. A.B.Natarajan and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-21-2015

Subject : Right to Information

ITEM NO.301+303 COURT NO.3 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 15-18 in Civil Appeal No(s). 5877-5878/2014 SECRETARY...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2000

R. Sarala Vs. T.S. Velu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 6(1), 24, 36, 154 to 168, 169, 170, 173, 174, 362 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304B and 498A; Prevention of Corruption Act

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD(Cri)59; 2000CriLJ2453; JT2000(4)SC449; 2000(II)OLR(SC)90; RLW2000(2)SC284; 2000(3)SCALE285; (2000)4SCC459; 2000(2)LC953(SC)

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. Investigation and prosecution are two different facets in the administration of criminal justice. The role of Public Prosecutor is inside the court, whereas investigation is outside the court. Normally the role of Public...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1994

The Registrar, University of Madras, Chepauk, Madras - 600005 and Othe ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-19-1994

Subject : Consumer

Reported in : (1995)IIMLJ367

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. Jothimani, ;Mr. M. Velusamy and ;Mr. Mohan Parasaran for Mr. P.S. Raman, ;Advs., Mr. G. Sugumaran, ;Special Govt. Pleader, Mr. T. Arulraj and ;Mrs. Meera Gupta, Addl. Central Govt. Standing Cou

ORDERSrinivasan, J. 1. Broadly stated, two contentions are mainly urged in this batch of writ petitions, one relating to the validity of some of the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (Act No. 68 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 1999

The Executive Officer, Arthanareswarar Temple Vs. R. Sathyamoorthy and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-09-1999

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious And Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 - Sections 23 and 34; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 23, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1999SC958; JT1999(1)SC343; (1999)IIMLJ39(SC); 1999(1)SCALE358; (1999)3SCC115; [1999]1SCR485

Advocate for Appellant : R. Sundarvardhan,; R.N. Keshwani and; Chanderakanta Nagak Ri

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.2. This appeal is preferred by the Executive Officer of the Arthanareswarar Temple against the judgment of the High Court of Madras dated 31.1.1991 in Civil Revision Petition No. 334 of 1987.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1994

The Registrar, University of Madras and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-19-1994

Subject : Consumer

Reported in : (1995)2MLJ367

Srinivasan, J.1. Broadly stated, two contentions are mainly urged in this batch of writ petitions, one relating to the validity of some of the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (Act No. 68 of 1986),...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial