Advanced Search Results

Arun Kumar Maheshwari Vs. Ito

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]144TAXMAN651(All)

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Upadhaya, Rakesh Ranjan Agrawal & Suyash Agrawal for the Petitioner B.J. Agarwal, Ashok Kumar, G. Krishna, A.N. Mahajan for the Respondent.

ORDERR.K. Agrawal, J. By separate petitions filed under article 226 of tile Constitution of India, Arun Kumar Maheshwari, petitioner in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 538 of 2001; Amit Kumar Maheshwari, petitioner in Civil Misc. Writ...

Cit Vs. Radico Khaitan Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]142TAXMAN681(All)

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Mahajan for the Revenue V.B. Upadhaya and Vikram Gulati, for the Assessee.

R.K. Agrawal, J. The present appeal preferred by the revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act) has been admitted by this court on the following four substantial...

Arun Kumar Maheshwari and ors. Vs. Income Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 69, 69A, 143(1), 143(3), 147 and 148; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 16(2); Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2005)196CTR(All)207; [2006]284ITR642(All)

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Upadhaya, ;Rakesh Ranjan Agrawal and ;Suyash Agrawal, Advs.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By separate petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Arun Kumar Maheshwari, petitioner in Civil Misc. Writ Petn. No. 538 of 2001; Amit Kumar Maheshwari, petitioner in Civil Misc. Writ...

Arun Kumar Maheshwari and anr. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sectiones 2(28), 116, 117(1), 143(1), 148, 151 and 151(2)

Reported in : (2007)207CTR(All)558; [2006]285ITR179(All)

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Upadhaya and Rakesh Ranjan Agarwal, Advs.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. The applicants-Arun Kumar Maheshwari and Amit Kumar Maheshwari-by means of Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 538 of 2001 and Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 539 of 2001 (see : [2006]284ITR642(All) ), respectively, filed...

Bareilly Flour Mills (P.) Ltd. and Another Vs. U.P. State Electricity ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Supply (Consumers) Regulations, 1984; Constitution of India - Article 226; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC913

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Tandon, ;V.B. Upadhaya, Advs.

G. P. Mathur, J.1. This petitionunder Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed praying for the following reliefs :1. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certlorari calling for the record and...

ishtiyak Ahmad Makrani Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. By means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :-  "i. to issue a writ of certiorari or an order or a...

M.C. Desai and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 - Sections 23 and 24; High Court Judges Rules, 1956 - Rule 2; All India Services (Death-cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958 - Rules 17(2) and 19(1); Constitution of India - Article 226; High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) (Amendment) Act, 1988

Reported in : AIR1988All283

Advocate for Appellant : Hanuman Upadhya, ;V.K. Upadhya and ;V.B. Upadhya, Advs.

Anshuman Singh, J. 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners for issue of writ in the nature of (i) mandamus directing the respondents to compute...

Devendra Kumar Vs. Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 14; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Financial Rules - Rule 14A

Reported in : (2004)3UPLBEC2318

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Upadhyay, Adv.

R.B. Misra, J.1. The present writ petition has been preferred to quash the order dated 18.3.1999 passed by the Additional Director (Administration) of Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad,, (inshort called 'Mandi Parishad'), U.P. Lucknow (Annexure-18 to...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Radico Khaitan Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 14, 22, 32A, 32A(2A), 36(1), 56, 56(2), 143(1) and 260A; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; Companies Act; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2); Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987

Reported in : (2005)194CTR(All)451; [2005]274ITR354(All)

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Mahajan, Adv.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. The present appeal preferred by the Revenue under Section 260A of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') has been admitted by this Court on the following four substantial questions...

Flowmore (P.) Ltd., New Delhi Vs. U.P. State Industrial Development Co ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 18, 18(1, 2 and 8) and 32; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 55, 56 and 62; Uttar Pradesh Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 - Sections 3(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(46), 3(1), 194(1) and 481; Constitution of India - Article 226; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 41, 41(1) and 48(1); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC493

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Updadhyay and ;Anurag Khanna, Advs.

N.K. Mitra, C. J.1. Petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, with having its registered office at 37-38 Community Centre, East of Kailash, New Delhi. The present petition has been instituted under Article...