Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v b rege · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.021 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 27 1978

Balkrishna Bhanudas Chillal Vs. Narayanibai Ramkrishna Kukal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-27-1978

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 41, Rules 23, 23-A, 25, 27, 28 and 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : AIR1979Bom106

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Rege, Adv.

ORDER1. The parties own adjoining plots of land situate in the village of Soregaon in District Sholapur, the Petitioner being the owner of the plot bearing survey No. 175 and the Respondent being the owner of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 1977

Mangilal Jawanmal and ors. Vs. the Special Land Acquisition Officer (i ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-29-1977

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 9, 11, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12A, 14, 17, 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18(3), 19, 20, 23, 23(1), 26, 26(2), 49 and 54; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 29(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2; Bombay Court-fees Act, 1959 - Schedule - Articles I and 15; Bombay Court-fees Act, 1870

Reported in : AIR1978Bom325; (1978)80BOMLR46

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Rege, ;G.L. Rege, ;A.A. Rizvi and ;S.V. Pal Suledesai, Advs.

Tulzapurkar, J.1. Since common questions arise for decision in these three matters, they have been placed before us together and we shall dispose them of by a common judgment. How-ever, it will be sufficient if the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 1960

The Digamber Parshwanath JaIn Mandir Vs. Valubai

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-25-1960

Subject : Civil

Acts : Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 15, 15(2) and 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR1961Bom221; (1961)63BOMLR58; ILR1961Bom214

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Rege, Adv.

1. This is an application filed by the plaintiff against the order of the learned District Judge in an appeal filed by the defendant against the decree passed by the trial Court in favour of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 21 1955

Savitribai Dattatraya Laxman Vs. Martand Dattatraya

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-21-1955

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 60; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 142, 144 and 148

Reported in : AIR1956Bom237

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Rege, Adv.

1. This second appeal arises out of a suit for redemption filed by the plaintiff Marutrao Dattatraya Uplawikar in the Court of the Second Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, at Kolhapur. The lands in dispute are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 1958

Sugandhabai Shivaram Hede and anr. Vs. Sundari Aba Mande and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-15-1958

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law; ;Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14, 15 and 16; ;Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 15(1) and 42; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 33

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR560

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Rege, Adv.

Gokhale, J.(1) This is an appeal by original defendants Nos. 1 and 2 against the decree passed by the Court of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, at Sholapur, in favour of the plaintiff and dependant No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 1958

Chandrabhaga Sadashiv and anr. Vs. Bhikachand Hansaji

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-08-1958

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 31, 32 and 33; Registration Act - Sections 14(1) and 40

Reported in : AIR1959Bom549; (1959)61BOMLR364; ILR1959Bom838

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Rege, Adv.

Patel, J.1. The plaintiff appellant filed the suit for refund of earnest paid, under an agreement to purchase, to the defendant on 6-2-1950. According to him the defendant has committed the breach. Previous to this there...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 1959

Balkrishna Eknath Vs. Shantilal Hemchand

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-07-1959

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 and 273 - Order 21, Rule 53, 53(1), 53(2), 53(3) and 53(4) - Order 22, Rule 10 - Order 34, Rule 5(3); Old Procedure Code, 1882

Reported in : AIR1961Bom56; 1961BomCR(Cri)56; (1960)62BOMLR410; ILR1960Bom554

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Rege, Adv.

Patel, J. 1. This appeal is by the plaintiff against the dismissal of his suit by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nasik, for a declaration that the final decree obtained by one Kesharbai in Special Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1958

Khanderao Malkarjun Dhotre Vs. Anandrao Laxmanrao Mashalkar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-02-1958

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 12(3); Delhi and Ajmer-Merwara Rent Control Act, 1947 - Sections 9(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order IV - Order 5, Rule 1, 7 and 8 - Order 8, Rule 1 - Order 9, Rule 1 - Order XII, Rule 4 - Order XIII, Rule 1 - Order XIV, Rule 1(5)

Reported in : AIR1959Bom471; (1958)60BOMLR1039; ILR1958Bom1325

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Rege, Adv.

ORDER1. This is a civil revision application arising out of an order of the Dist. Court, Sholapur, and the point that arises for determination is as to what is the meaning of the words 'on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 1958

Sardarsing Amarsing Gaherwal Vs. Ramakaran Ramnath Upadhaya and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-12-1958

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 182 and 182(2)

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR984

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Rege, Adv.

(1) This is first appeal arises out of an execution proceeding and it raises a question under clause (2) of Art 182 of the Indian Limitation Act. The question is as to the construction of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 1955

Sanja Bandaji Vs. Ahmedabad Jaybharat Cotton Mills Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-07-1955

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 591 - Order 20, Rule 12; Madras Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948

Reported in : AIR1956Bom612

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Rege, Adv.

1. The following genealogy shows the relationship between the parties to this dispute. ANANTBHAT (dead on 12-11-1924) ____________________________|___________________________ | | |Harbhat (dead) Vasudeo Dadbhat | (dead in 1907) (given in adoption) | | | Narayan (Plff.)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial