Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: v b patil · Page 1 of about 26 results (0.117 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 10 2003

Ramdas Shriram Chaudhari Vs. Guna Kondu Dhanger,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-10-2003

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act - Schedule - Articles 64 and 135

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR518

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Patil, Adv.

D.S. Zoting, J.1. Heard Mr. V. B. Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arun D. Kulkarni, advocate, holding for Mr. C.V. Thombre, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Rule, returnable forthwith, by consent of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 2007

Sarva Shramik Sangh Vs. Janprabha Offset Works and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-23-2007

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28; Bombay Public Trust Act; Industrial Disputes Act; Indian Partnership Act; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ271Bom

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Patil, Adv.

M.G. Gaikwad, J.1. Heard learned advocates for respective parties. With consent of parties, appeals are heard and finally decided at the stage of admission.2. These appeals are directed against a common judgment in Writ Petitions No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2006

Dalsing S/O Shamsing Rajput Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-21-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 73B and 73B(3); Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 56M and 56(M)(1); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 32 and 226

Reported in : 2006(4)ALLMR580; 2006(5)BomCR691; 2006(3)MhLj592

Advocate for Appellant : V.D. Hon, Adv.

N.V. Dabholkar, J. 1. Heard learned advocate Shri V.D. Hon, for the petitioner, learned AGP Shri Ghute Patil, for respondent Nos. 1 to 3, and learned advocate Shri V.B. Patil, for respondent No. 4. Respondent No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 04 2002

Shri Gopaldas Jankiram Dahad Vs. the State of Maharashtra,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-04-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Directorate of Forensic Science Laboratories, Maharashtra State (Recruitment) Rules, 1991 - Rule 5; Constitution of India - Article 16(1); The Deputy and Assistant Directors in the Forensic Science Laboratories - Recruitment Rules, 1975 - Rule 8

Reported in : 2003(3)MhLj551

Advocate for Appellant : Party in person

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. In this petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner has called in question the judgment and order dated 20.7.2000 by which Misc. Application No. 563/98, Contempt Petition No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 1985

Municipal Corporation Through Municipal Commissioner Vs. Shankar S/O H ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-23-1985

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 43, 52, 53, 54, 142 and 152; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468

Reported in : 1986(2)BomCR38

Advocate for Appellant : K.G. Navandar, Adv.

Sharad Manohar, J.1. Quite an important question relating to the interpretation and functioning of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act 1966, (hereinafter referred to as 'The Town Planning Act'), arises for consideration in this appeal.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1971

Ganesh Foundry Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Bangalore District Circle, ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-18-1971

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 18-A

Reported in : [1971]28STC259(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Srinivasan, Adv.

ORDERGovinda Bhat, J.1. These two writ petitions preferred by an assessee under the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957, are directed against the orders levying penalty under section 18-A of the Act. 2. The assessee is a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1993

Saifi Mohammed and ors. Vs. Deepak Kumar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-07-1993

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1994)ACC377; 1994ACJ1181

Advocate for Appellant : Surjeet Singh, Adv.

A.R. Tiwari, J.1. This revision petition presented under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, 'the Code') is directed against the order dated 17.9.1993, passed by M.A.C.T., Mandsaur, in Claim Case No. 67...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 2009

Ashok Laxman Attarde and ors. Vs. Atmaram Bhanu Saindane and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-25-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 - Sections 3 and 3(4); Constitution of India - Article 227; The Maharashtra Resettlement of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Rules, 1975 - Rule 3

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR231

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Kulkarni, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 365 and 366/2009

Gavai B.R., J.1. By way of Writ Petition No. 365/2009, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 3rd December 2008 passed by the learned Member of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Mumbai, in Appeal TRB No. 197/B/2008,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 2010

The State of Maharashtra, Through Its Dy. Secretary, Department of Agr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-12-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

01. Rule. Rule made returnable forth with, and with the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, petition is taken up for final hearing at the admission stage itself.02. By the present petition filed under Articles...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2009

Shivajirao S/O Prataprao Chalukya Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-20-2009

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 27(3A), 73(1A) 73G and 73G(1); Maharashtra Specified Co-operative Societies Elections to Committees Rules, 1971 - Rules 4, 4(1), 4(4), 6, 6(5), 6(6), 6(7) and 7

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR1359

Advocate for Appellant : N.P. Patil (Jamalpurkar), Adv.

Naresh H. Patil, J.1. Heard.2. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith.3. The petitioner challenges an order dated 1/1/2009 passed by Collector, Osmanabad rejecting objection petition filed by him to the provisional list of voters published for holding elections...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial