Advanced Search Results

Embassy Hotels (P) Ltd. Represented by Its Managing Director Mr. Abdul ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 51 and 151 - Order 21, Rule 26 - Order 41, Rules 5, 5(1), 5(3), 6, 6(1) and 6(2)

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ1219

Advocate for Appellant : Ar.L. Sundaresan, Sr. Adv. for; N. Anand Venkatesh, Adv.

ORDERA.C. Arumugaperumal Adityan, J.1. This revision has been directed against the order passed in E.A. No. 1075 of 2007 in E.P. No. 1 of 2007 in O.S. No 1538 of 1980 on the file of the...

The Additional Commissioner of Sales Tax, VAT-III Vs. Kayani Bakery, P ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J.] 1. These three Notices of Motion are preferred by the Revenue seeking condonation of delay in preferring appeals under Section 27 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, against the Judgment...

Bhagwan Singh and ors. Vs. Puran Chand

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rules 5, 6, 6(2), 56(1) and 56(2)

Reported in : (2006)142PLR462

Advocate for Appellant : B.S. Bhasaur, Adv.

Jasbir Singh, J.1. This revision petition has been filed against order dated 29.1.200, vide which application of the petitioner, under Order 41, Rule 6 C.P.C. for grant of stay of execution proceedings was dismissed. Court below,...

Babu Singh Vs. State Bank of India

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 6(1) and 6(2)

Reported in : (1998)119PLR336

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Bansal, Adv.

Swatanter Kumar, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 13.11.1997 passed by the learned civil judge (Junior Division), Moga. By impugned order, the learned Executing court dismissed the application filed by the judgment-debtor...

M/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. These two references under the then Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the “BST Act”) seek an answer and opinion of this Court on the following questions of law,...

Niphad Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and Others Vs. State of Maharasht ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. In all these Petitions, the Petitioners have challenged the constitutional validity of some of the provisions of the Maharashtra Purchase Tax on Sugarcane Act, 1962 (for short âthe Act of 1962â?). Since...

M/S in Bloom. Vs. the Commissioner of Sales Tax.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Section 5, 61(1), 2(17), 41; Calcutta Sales Tax Act

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. V. Surte, Adv.

1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned counsel for the Respondent.2. This is a reference under section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 ("the BST Act" for short) made by...

The Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Moonlight Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax/Vat

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2(17), 2(28), 3A, 13AA, 32, 36(3), 41(1), 57 and 61(1); ;Works Contract Act, 1985; ;Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Section 20; ;Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948; ;Constitution of India - Articles 286, 366 and 366(29A)

Advocate for Appellant : V.A. Sonpal, "A" Panel Counsel

K.K. Tated, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the rival parties.2. This reference, at the instance of the Applicant/Revenue, is made by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal, Mumbai under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax...

The Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Gharda Chemicals Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Bombay Sales Act, 1959 - Sections 33(4A) and 43A

Reported in : (2008)14VST418(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : V.A. Sonpal, AGP

R.S. Mohite, J.1. This is an application preferred by the Commissioner of Sales Tax (hereinafter referred to as the 'applicant') against Gharda Chemicals Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'respondent'). The applicant is aggrieved by the...

The Commissioner of Sales Tax Maharashtra State Vs. Rolta Computer and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Maharashtra Sales Tax on the Transfer of the Right to use any goods for any purpose Act, 1985 - Sections 2(10), 3, 4 and 61(1); Lease Act; Constitution of India - Article 366(29A)

Reported in : (2009)25VST322(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : V.A. Sonpal, AGP

J.H. Bhatia, J.1. The Commissioner of Sales Tax filed the application seeking direction to the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal to refer the following questions to the High Court under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax...