Advanced Search Results
B. Nagi Reddi Vs. Cit
Chennai
Jul-25-2002
Direct Taxation
(2002)177CTR(Mad)129
Uttam Reddi, for the Assessee T.C.A. Ramanujam, for the Revenue
ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J.This judgment shall dispose of all the three tax cases as the question of law involved is common and the only difference is that of the assessment year.2. The question of law, which is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.T.M.S. Umma Salma Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Madras
Chennai
Dec-10-1981
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(43), 116, 139, 143, 148, 156, 271, 271(1), 271(4A) and 254(2)
[1983]144ITR890(Mad)
M. Uttam Reddi, Adv.
Pasmanabhan, J.1. The assessee in this case Mrs. K. T. M. S. Umma Salma, Madras, purchased a land on September 28, 1966, for a sum of Rs. 45,000. She should have filed the return of income...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHyderabad Race Club Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-22-1985
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(15), 11, 11(2), 80G and 256; Companies Act - Sections 25
[1985]153ITR521(AP)
M. Uttam Reddy, Adv.
Anjaneyulu, J. 1. These there references arise under the I.T. Act, 1961 ('the Act' for short). the reference are made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal at the instance of the Hyderabad Race Club, hereinafter referred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Eimco K.C.P., Madras Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras
Supreme Court of India
Feb-25-2000
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 30 to 36, 35-A, 36, 37(1), 256(1) and 263; Indian Companies Act
AIR2000SC1112; [2000]242ITR659(SC); JT2000(2)SC468; 2000(2)SCALE106; (2000)2SCC729; [2000]1SCR1185
M. Uttam Reddy,;A.V. Rangam;B.A. Ranganadhan an; G.I. Gopalkrishnan, Advs
ORDERSyed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. The judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madras in T.C. Nos. 1224 and 1225 of 1977 dated January 17, 1983 is subject-matter of challenge...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijaya Production Private Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Chennai
Dec-19-1978
Direct Taxation
Super Profits Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 9 and 19; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 153
(1979)11CTR(Mad)174; [1980]122ITR136(Mad)
M. Uttam Reddi, Adv.
Ismail, J.1. The proceedings relate to the assessment under the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963 (Central Act 14 of 1963), hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' and the assessment year concerned is 1963-64. The assessee had...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Nagi Reddi Charity
Chennai
Sep-15-1998
Direct Taxation
(1999)154CTR(Mad)429
C.V. Rajan, for the Revenue Uttam Reddy, for the Assessee
ORDERBabu, J.The questions referred to us at the instance of the revenue are :'1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Tribunal has rightly held that the activity of the assessee relating...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmico Kcp Ltd. Vs. Cit
Chennai
Jul-02-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]124TAXMAN48(Mad)
Senthilkumar and Uttam Reddy, for the Assessee T.C.A. Ramanujam, for the Revenue
ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J. Two questions are referred to us at the instance of the assessee and under the directions of this court. They are :'1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCwt Vs. Mrs. Irmgard Velagapudi
Chennai
Aug-12-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]125TAXMAN45(Mad)
T.C.A. Ramanujam, for the Revenue Uttam Reddy, for the Assessee
ORDERR. Jayasimha Babu, J. The matter in issue is with regard to valuation of shares in a private company. The Tribunal rendered its decision at a time when it did not have the benefit of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. India Meters Ltd.
Chennai
Nov-11-2002
Direct Taxation
[2003]129TAXMAN771(Mad)
Mrs. Pushya Sitharaman, for the Revenue T.R. Senthilkumar and M. Uttam Reddy, for the Assessee
N.V. Balasubramanian, J.T.C. No. 436 of 1999 is a reference under the Income Tax Act, 1961 and T.C. Nos. 35 and 36 of 1998 are reference made under Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964.2. We first take...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCwt Vs. V.M. Rao
Chennai
Aug-12-2002
Direct Taxation
[2003]130TAXMAN60(Mad)
T.C.A. Ramanujam, for the Revenue Uttam Reddy, for the Assessee
ORDERR. Jayasimha Babu, J.The matter in issue is valuation of shares in a Private Company. The Tribunal rendered its decision at a time when it did not have the benefit of the decision of the Supreme...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »