Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: umesh narain sharma · Page 1 of about 57 results (0.065 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 01 1997

Ashok Kumar Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-01-1997

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 16

Reported in : 1998(2)AWC960

Advocate for Appellant : Umesh Narain Sharma and ;Hamendra Kumar, Advs.

O. P. Garg, J.1. Heard Sri Umesh Narain Sharma, learned counsel for thepetitioner. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner. Ashok Kumar Singh has sought his repatriation from Intelligence Department to Civil Police with all...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2001

Dr. H.S. Rai and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-16-2001

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1167; (2001)2UPLBEC1603

Advocate for Appellant : Umesh Narain Sharma, Adv.

M. Katju, J.1. Heard Sri Umesh Narain Sharma learned counsel for the petitioners, learned standing counsel for the State Government and Shri Pushpendra Singh for the U. P. Public Service Commission.2. The petitioners are all working...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1999

Rang Nath Vs. Vith Addl. District Judge, Varanasi and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-24-1999

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 20 (4) and (6) and 30; Small Causes Court Act - Sections 25

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC3220

Advocate for Appellant : Umesh Narain Sharma, Adv.

J.C. Gupta, J. 1. This is landlord's petition challenging the order of the revisional court dated 5.10.93 whereby decree of eviction passed by the trial court has been set aside.2. The dispute relates to a shop...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 15 1999

Dr. Jagdish Singh Katiyar and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-15-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Regularisation of Ad Hoc Appointments (On Posts with the Purivew of Pulbic Service Commission) Rules, 1979 - Rules 2, 4, 4(2), 4(6), 5 and 6; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2219

Advocate for Appellant : P.R. Pal, ;Murli Dhar and ;P.C. Srivastava, Advs.

Palok Basu and S.K. Jain, JJ.1.Bereft of the details of all the relevant writ petitions, the principal question involved in this bunch of the writ petition is whether petitioners Dr. Jagdish Singh Katiyar. Dr. Israr Ahmad,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 1993

Gulshan Kumar Vs. the Collector, Ghaziabad and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-13-1993

Subject : Civil

Acts : Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 8; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 17; Procedure of High Court Act, 1869 - Sections 3 and 4; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 191 and 193; Uttar Pradesh Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 409; Indian Oaths Act, 1872

Reported in : AIR1994All243

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Mandhyan and ;Smt. P.I. Sawhney, Advs.

ORDERRavi S. Dhavan, J.1. By this petition, and the facts averred in it, the Court was led to pass an ad interim order on 21 September, 1993, as the petitioner had contended that therecovery certificate, issued...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2009

Kashi Nath Mishra Vs. Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-02-2009

Subject : Banking

Reported in : 2009(85)AWC1907

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. Heard Shri Umesh Narain Sharma, the learned senior counsel, assisted by Shri R. C. Singh, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Shri Siddharth, the learned Counsel for respondent No. 3.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2014

Public Service Commission U.P. Vs. State Information Commission and An ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-08-2014

Subject : Right to Information

Respondent no.2 filed an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred as the Act) requesting the Public Service Commission, U.P. (hereinafter referred as the Commission) to supply a photocopy of the mathematics Ist...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 1993

L. Kant Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-22-1993

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Rules - Rules 9(2), 52A, 173Q and 226

Reported in : 1994LC42(Allahabad); 1994(71)ELT900(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Ranjan Agrawal, Adv.

Anshuman Singh, J.1. Heard Shri Rakesh Ranjan Agarwal, Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Umesh Narain Sharma, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the Union of India. It is alleged that the petitioner is a holder...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1993

Ghai Ice Cream Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cegat

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-01-1993

Subject : Excise

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Act - Sections 35F; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1994(71)ELT669(All)

ORDERAnshuman Singh, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order dated 4-8-1993 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, directing the petitioner to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 1996

Lt. Col. (Retd.) Ashok Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-10-1996

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123; Constitution of India - Article 77(3); Transaction of Business Rules, 1961 - Rule 3; Constitution (Forty-forth Amendment), 1978 - Sections 12; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 27 and 39

Reported in : 1997CriLJ2688

Advocate for Appellant : Party in person

ORDER1. This order or judgment would not be complete and is only an appendix to the order of the Court dated 26 May 1990, which was a repercussion to the framing of the charges against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial