Advanced Search Results
Ashok Kumar Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Dec-01-1997
Service
Constitution of India - Article 16
1998(2)AWC960
Umesh Narain Sharma and ;Hamendra Kumar, Advs.
O. P. Garg, J.1. Heard Sri Umesh Narain Sharma, learned counsel for thepetitioner. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner. Ashok Kumar Singh has sought his repatriation from Intelligence Department to Civil Police with all...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. H.S. Rai and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Mar-16-2001
Service
2001(2)AWC1167; (2001)2UPLBEC1603
Umesh Narain Sharma, Adv.
M. Katju, J.1. Heard Sri Umesh Narain Sharma learned counsel for the petitioners, learned standing counsel for the State Government and Shri Pushpendra Singh for the U. P. Public Service Commission.2. The petitioners are all working...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRang Nath Vs. Vith Addl. District Judge, Varanasi and Others
Allahabad
Sep-24-1999
Tenancy
Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 20 (4) and (6) and 30; Small Causes Court Act - Sections 25
1999(4)AWC3220
Umesh Narain Sharma, Adv.
J.C. Gupta, J. 1. This is landlord's petition challenging the order of the revisional court dated 5.10.93 whereby decree of eviction passed by the trial court has been set aside.2. The dispute relates to a shop...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dr. Jagdish Singh Katiyar and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
May-15-1999
Service
Uttar Pradesh Regularisation of Ad Hoc Appointments (On Posts with the Purivew of Pulbic Service Commission) Rules, 1979 - Rules 2, 4, 4(2), 4(6), 5 and 6; Constitution of India - Article 14
1999(3)AWC2219
P.R. Pal, ;Murli Dhar and ;P.C. Srivastava, Advs.
Palok Basu and S.K. Jain, JJ.1.Bereft of the details of all the relevant writ petitions, the principal question involved in this bunch of the writ petition is whether petitioners Dr. Jagdish Singh Katiyar. Dr. Israr Ahmad,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGulshan Kumar Vs. the Collector, Ghaziabad and Others
Allahabad
Oct-13-1993
Civil
Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 8; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 17; Procedure of High Court Act, 1869 - Sections 3 and 4; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 191 and 193; Uttar Pradesh Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 409; Indian Oaths Act, 1872
AIR1994All243
B.D. Mandhyan and ;Smt. P.I. Sawhney, Advs.
ORDERRavi S. Dhavan, J.1. By this petition, and the facts averred in it, the Court was led to pass an ad interim order on 21 September, 1993, as the petitioner had contended that therecovery certificate, issued...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKashi Nath Mishra Vs. Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-02-2009
Banking
2009(85)AWC1907
Tarun Agarwala, J.1. Heard Shri Umesh Narain Sharma, the learned senior counsel, assisted by Shri R. C. Singh, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Shri Siddharth, the learned Counsel for respondent No. 3.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPublic Service Commission U.P. Vs. State Information Commission and An ...
Allahabad
Jan-08-2014
Right to Information
Respondent no.2 filed an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred as the Act) requesting the Public Service Commission, U.P. (hereinafter referred as the Commission) to supply a photocopy of the mathematics Ist...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskL. Kant Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Allahabad
Sep-22-1993
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Rules - Rules 9(2), 52A, 173Q and 226
1994LC42(Allahabad); 1994(71)ELT900(All)
Rakesh Ranjan Agrawal, Adv.
Anshuman Singh, J.1. Heard Shri Rakesh Ranjan Agarwal, Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Umesh Narain Sharma, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the Union of India. It is alleged that the petitioner is a holder...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGhai Ice Cream Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cegat
Allahabad
Oct-01-1993
Excise
Indian Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Act - Sections 35F; Constitution of India - Article 226
1994(71)ELT669(All)
ORDERAnshuman Singh, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order dated 4-8-1993 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, directing the petitioner to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLt. Col. (Retd.) Ashok Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Allahabad
Sep-10-1996
Contempt of Court
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123; Constitution of India - Article 77(3); Transaction of Business Rules, 1961 - Rule 3; Constitution (Forty-forth Amendment), 1978 - Sections 12; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 27 and 39
1997CriLJ2688
Party in person
ORDER1. This order or judgment would not be complete and is only an appendix to the order of the Court dated 26 May 1990, which was a repercussion to the framing of the charges against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »