Advanced Search Results

Vadilal Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1998)(99)ELT513Tri(Mum.)bai

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Uday Joshi

1. The Appellants manufacture ice-cream falling under sub-heading 2105.00 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Ice-cream became dutiable from 20-3-1990. They had filed declaration for availing Modvat credit on inputs under Rule 57G of Central Excise...

Anu Mangalani Vs. Rajiv Gupta

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Mr. Sanjay Dua, Mr. Uday Joshi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:07. 05.2015 + RC Rev. 342/2011 ANU MANGALANI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Dua & Mr. Uday Joshi,...

Shyam Sunder and anr. Vs. Rakavi Hospitality and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Mr. Sanjay Dua, Mr. Uday Joshi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:16. h September, 2014 + CS (OS) No.2026/2013 SHYAM SUNDER & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Dua, Adv....

Fascel Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)STR103

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Uday Joshi Id

1. The appellant is a cell phone service provider and is liable to pay service tax on the services provided. The appellant were separately registered at Ahmedabad, Baroda and Surat. During the year 1997-98, in respect...

Alembic Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2006(193)ELT282(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Uday Joshi, Adv. for; Trivedi and Gupta

D.A. Mehta, J.1. Heard Mr. Uday Joshi for Trivedi & Gupta, Id. Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Malkan appearing for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 4. The dispute between the parties is confined to...

Sadbhav Engineering Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Customs

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(187)ELT300(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Uday Joshi, Adv. for; TRIVEDI & GUPTA, Advs. For Petitioner Nos. 1-2

D.A. Mehta, J. 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India principally challenges the order No.03/2004 dated 12th August 2004 (Annexure 'A') made by respondent No.2 and seeks a further direction that respondent...

Dewan Chand Builders and Contractors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Building and Other Construction Workers' (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 12, 18(1), 2(a), 2(d), 9, 5, 11; Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Rules, 1998

Reported in : (2012)1SCC101

D.K. JAIN, J.1. These appeals, by special leave, arise out of the judgment and final order dated 28-2-2007 in Builders Assn. of India v. Union of India1 rendered by the High Court of Delhi, whereby, the...

Commr. of C. Ex. Vs. Paras Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1999)(63)ECC293

1. The respondents in this case are manufacturing Patent or Proprietary Medicines. They packed the tablets in strips of 10 tablets each and these strips are then packed in a small carton, which are packed in...

M/S. Mare Walker Opticals Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2001)(132)ELT488Tri(Mum.)bai

1. Vide Order No. C-II/WZB/2001 the present applicants were directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 9,74,643/-. In the proceedings leading to this appeal duty of Rs. 23,24,643/-had been demanded and confirmed on account of the...

Balmukand and Anr Vs. Anuj Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 544/2013 Reserved on:13. h January, 2015 Decided on:21. t January, 2015 % BALMUKAND & ANR Through ..... Petitioners Petitioners in person. versus ANUJ KUMAR...