Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: u r lalit · Page 1 of about 320 results (0.128 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Feb 26 2001

Sandeep Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Haryana Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-26-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201, 302 and 364

Reported in : AIR2001SC1103; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)620; 2001CriLJ1456; JT2001(3)SC136; 2001(2)SCALE331; (2001)9SCC41

Advocate for Appellant : U.R. Lalit,; Sushil Kumar,; Jaspal Singh, Sr. Advs.,;

Shah, J.1. On the charge of murder of one Vishal Goel, Sandeep (A1), Arun Bhatia (A2), Vikram Singh (A3), Mandeep (A4) and one juvenile Aman were prosecuted. Trial of juvenile was separated. The Additional Sessions Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Mar 22 2001

Sucha Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-22-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA), 1985; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 106 and 114

Reported in : AIR2001SC1436; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)740; 2001(1)ALT(Cri)375; 2001(49)BLJR1526; 2001CriLJ1734; 2001(2)Crimes69(SC); JT2001(4)SC107; RLW2001(2)SC345; 2001(2)SCALE543; (2001)4SCC375

Advocate for Appellant : U.R. Lalit, Sr. Adv.,; M.K. Michael,; Parminder Singh, Ad

THOMAS, J.1. During the months when insurgency in the State of Punjab was at its peak two striplings were knocked off from their house on a dark night by armed assailants in the very sight of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Apr 15 2002

Krishna Mochi and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-15-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(4), 4 and 5 ; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 326, 341, 342, 436 and 452 ; Arms Act ; Criminal Laws (Amendment) Act - Sections 17 ; Constitution of India - Articles 6, 19 and 21 ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235(2) and 354(3) ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 134

Reported in : AIR2002SC1965; 2002(1)ALD(Cri)761; (2002)3CALLT9(SC); 2002CriLJ2645; 2002(2)Crimes236(SC); JT2002(4)SC186; 2002(3)SCALE602; (2002)6SCC81; [2002]3SCR1

Advocate for Appellant : U.R. Lalit and; H.L. Agrawal, Sr. Advs.,; Irshad Ahmed, Ad

Shah, J.1. With respect I regret for my inability to agree with the judgment rendered by my learned brother Justice Agrawal. At the outset, it requires to be stated that this case illustrates how faulty, delayed,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
May 09 2000

Arnit Das Vs. State of Bihar Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-09-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 17, 18, 20, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 and 63; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; The U.N. Standard Minimum Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 20 (1), 141 and 253; Children Act, 1960; WB Children Act, 1959 - Sections 24; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164

Reported in : AIR2000SC2264; 2000(2)ALD(Cri)22; 2000CriLJ2971; JT2000(6)SC320; 2000(4)SCALE515; (2000)5SCC488; [2000]Supp1SCR69; 2000(2)LC1062(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : U.R. Lalit, Sr. Adv.;N.R. Choudhary; Jai Prakash Pandey; Somnath Mukherjee, Advs

R.C. Lahoti, J.1. On 5-9-1998, Crime No. 574/98 under Section 302, I.P.C. was registered at P.S. Kadamkuan, Patna. According to the FIR, one Abhishek was shot dead on that day. On 13-9-1998 the petitioner was arrested...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Oct 18 2001

Patel Hiralal Joitaram Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-18-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 162 and 162(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 32 and 32(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 299 and 300

Reported in : AIR2001SC2944; 2001(2)ALD(Cri)907; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)362; (2002)1GLR248; JT2001(9)SC282; RLW2002(1)SC149; 2001(7)SCALE440; (2002)1SCC22; 2002(1)LC237(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : U.R. Lalit, Sr. Adv.,; Ms Reetu Sharma and; Vimal Chandra Da

Thomas, J.1. A business of Patan (Gujarat) was arraigned for scorching a young hapless woman (mother of two infant children) to death. The gory felony was perpetrated in broad day light on a public road. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Feb 20 2001

Daya Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-20-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3 and 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 307; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR2001SC1188; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)578; 2001CriLJ1268; JT2001(3)SC16; 2001(2)SCALE122; (2001)3SCC468; [2001]1SCR1115

Advocate for Appellant : U.R. Lalit, Sr. Adv.,; S.R. Sharma,; S. Srinivasan,;

ORDERShah, J.1. In Sessions Case No.44 of 1989, 14-accused were tried for various offences including Sections 3 and 5 of the Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as 'the TADA Act') by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Nov 29 1977

The Railway Board and ors. Vs. P.R. Subramaniyam and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-29-1977

Subject : Service

Acts : Indian Railway Code - Rules 20 and 157; Constitution of India - Article 309

Reported in : AIR1978SC284; [1978(36)FLR159]; 1978LabIC169; (1978)ILLJ208SC; (1978)1SCC158; 1977(9)LC802(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : U.R. Lalit and; Girish Chandra, Advs

N.L. Untwalia, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave. The appellants are the Railway Board and some officers of the Southern Railway concerned with the passing of the impugned orders. Respondents 1 to 9 were...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
May 11 1983

Amrit Bhikaji Kale and ors. Vs. Kashinath Janardhan Trade and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-11-1983

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 15, 29, 32, 32F, 32G and 32P; Common Law; Transfer of Property Act

Reported in : AIR1983SC643; 1983MhLJ711(SC); 1983(1)SCALE632; (1983)3SCC437; [1983]3SCR237

Advocate for Appellant : U.R. Lalit,; C.B. Singh and; P.H. Parekh, Advs

D.A. Desai, J.1. Land bearing Survey No. 1052 admeasuring 16 acres situated within the revenue limits of Village Sonai Taluka Nawasa Distt. Ahmendnagar, belonged to Tarachand Chopra Janardhan, the father of the respondent was admittedly the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Aug 16 2002

Harjit Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 148, 149, 302, 307, 313, 322, 323, 324 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161

Reported in : AIR2002SC3040; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)420; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)227; 2002(3)Crimes158(SC); JT2002(6)SC123; 2002(5)SCALE644; (2002)6SCC739; [2002]SUPP1SCR581

Advocate for Appellant : K.B. Sinha and; U.R. Lalit, Sr. Advs.,; Bimal Roy Jad,;

Dharmadhikari, J.1. This appeal by three-convicted accused is being decided with Criminal Appeal No. 814 of 2001 preferred by the State of Punjab against the acquittal of other three accused in the same incident. These appeals...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Oct 16 1992

Sarojini Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201, 302 and 306

Reported in : 1993(1)ALT(Cri)596; 1993CriLJ1648; 1992(3)Crimes859(SC); JT1992(Suppl1)SC433; 1992(3)SCALE70; 1993Supp(4)SCC632; [1992]Supp2SCR25

Advocate for Appellant : U.R. Lalit, Senior Adv. and; S.K. Gambhir, Adv

K. Ramaswamy, J.1. Special leave granted.2. Vinod Bhalla and his mother Smt. Sarojini were charged under Section 302 read with Section 34 I.P.C. or alternatively under Section 306 read with Section 34 I.P.C. by the Sessions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales