Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: u n bachawat · Page 1 of about 60 results (0.099 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 16 2010

Sanjay Kumar Jain. Vs. State of Delhi.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-16-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304B; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 51, 313; Indian Evidence act - Section 27

1. Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi passed in Criminal Appeal No.63 of 1997 dated 12.11.2009.3. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2001

Babu Khan and ors. Vs. Nazim Khan (Dead) by Lrs. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-16-2001

Subject : LimitationTenancy

Acts : Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act, 1950 - Sections 91, 92, 93 and 147; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 65 - Sections 14(1); Specific Reliefs Act, 1963 - Sections 6; M.P. Land Revenue Code - Sections 250; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR2001SC1740; JT2001(5)SC1; 2001(3)SCALE363; (2001)5SCC375; [2001]2SCR1199

Advocate for Appellant : U.N. Bachawat, Sr. Adv. and;S.B. Tripathi Adv.;for Ashok K. Srivastav

V.N. Khare, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of Madhya Pradesh High Court whereby the High Court has allowed the second appeal preferred by the defendants/respondents and dismissed the suit brought by the appellants...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 1999

Purshottam Dass Gupta (Shri) Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-28-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)645; 80(1999)DLT230

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. U.N. Bachawat, Sr.Adv.,; Mr. Raj Kishore Gupta,; Mr. An

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner has filed the writ petition challenging the adverse remarks made by the High Court for the years 1994 and 1995 at one go and seeking promotion from the date on which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 10 1996

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Jaora Sugar Mills Ltd., and Others Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-10-1996

Subject : Commercial Consumer

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3(3), 7, 12, 15 to 17, 19 and 21

Reported in : 1996VIIIAD(SC)554; AIR1997SC600; 1996(8)SCALE88; (1997)9SCC207; [1996]Supp7SCR411

Advocate for Appellant : U.N. Bachawat,; B.S. Banthia and; S.K. Agnihotri, Advs

1. These appeals by special leave are filed against the judgment and order dated September 1, 1978 and September 4, 1978 passed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench in Misc. Petition Nos. 140,139, 43...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2004

Anil Bansal Vs. Ashok Kumar Bansal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-27-2004

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 2004(1)ARBLR422(SC); 2004(2)AWC1787(SC); JT2004(5)SC50; 2004(2)SCALE772; (2005)9SCC368

Advocate for Appellant : U.N. Bachawat,; Sunil Gupta and ; A.K. Chitale, Sr. Advs.,;

S.H. Kapadia, J. 1. A partnership firm, M/s Laxmi Fancy Stores had among others Laxmi Narayan Bansal, Om Prakash Bansal, and Jagdish Prasad Bansal as its partners. It carried on business from a shop owned by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2002

Vikas Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-02-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 304B, 364, 498 and 498A

Reported in : AIR2002SC2830; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)213; 2002CriLJ3760; 2002(3)Crimes62(SC); JT2002(5)SC573; 2002(5)SCALE477; (2002)6SCC728; [2002]SUPP1SCR435; 2002(2)LC1210(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : U.N. Bachawat, Sr. Adv.,; Harinder Mohan Singh,; Anil Hooda

Shah, J.1. Daily, demon of dowry is devouring lives of young girls, who marry with high hopes of having heavenly abode in their husband's house. In few cases, guilty are punished but it has no deterrent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 14 2013

Satpal P. Malhotra and Others Vs. Puneet Malhotra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-14-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Dwarkadas, Mr. D'Vitre

By this appeal filed under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘Arbitration Act, 1996), the appellants seek to challenge the order dated 31st May, 2010 passed by the learned District Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2011

Dharambir and anr. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-26-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313, 157, 161, 311

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. U. N. Bhachawat; Mr. Syed Hasan Isfahani; Mr. Alok Bhachawat, Advs.

1. The Appellants Dharambir, Raghubir Singh and Satbir @ Sattey (the Appellant Ratti Kaur has expired and the proceedings against her have abated) stand convicted by the judgment and order dated 24.03.1998 and 27.03.1998 passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2003

Ramgopal and anr. Vs. Balaji Mandir Trust and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-19-2003

Subject : TenancyTrusts and Societies

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Public Trust Act, 1951; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 3(2), 12 and 12(1); Wakf Act, 1954

Reported in : AIR2003SC1883; JT2003(2)SC498; 2003(2)MPHT338; 2003(2)SCALE340; (2003)5SCC17; [2003]2SCR212

Advocate for Appellant : U.N. Bhachawat, Sr. Adv.,; Alok Bhachawat,; Sushil Kumar Jain

Shivaraj V. Patil, J.1. Leave granted.2. The plaintiffs filed a suit against the defendant for the eviction from the house and shop given to them on rent. The plaintiff No. 1 is a religious institution registered...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1998

Town and Country Development Authority Vs. Sitaram Choudhary and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 38; Madhya Pradesh Town Improvement Trust Act, 1960 - Sections 51, 60(1), 70 and 71

Reported in : AIR1999SC548; JT1998(6)SC658; (1998)5SCC576

ORDER1. Jabalpur Town & Country Development Authority, appellant herein, is an authority established under Section 38(1) of M.P. Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973. It is the successor to the Jabalpur Town Improvement Trust (hereinafter referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial