Advanced Search Results
Sanjay Kumar Jain. Vs. State of Delhi.
Supreme Court of India
Dec-16-2010
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304B; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 51, 313; Indian Evidence act - Section 27
1. Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi passed in Criminal Appeal No.63 of 1997 dated 12.11.2009.3. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabu Khan and ors. Vs. Nazim Khan (Dead) by Lrs. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-16-2001
LimitationTenancy
Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act, 1950 - Sections 91, 92, 93 and 147; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 65 - Sections 14(1); Specific Reliefs Act, 1963 - Sections 6; M.P. Land Revenue Code - Sections 250; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9
AIR2001SC1740; JT2001(5)SC1; 2001(3)SCALE363; (2001)5SCC375; [2001]2SCR1199
U.N. Bachawat, Sr. Adv. and;S.B. Tripathi Adv.;for Ashok K. Srivastav
V.N. Khare, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of Madhya Pradesh High Court whereby the High Court has allowed the second appeal preferred by the defendants/respondents and dismissed the suit brought by the appellants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPurshottam Dass Gupta (Shri) Vs. Union of India
Delhi
May-28-1999
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226
1999IVAD(Delhi)645; 80(1999)DLT230
Mr. U.N. Bachawat, Sr.Adv.,; Mr. Raj Kishore Gupta,; Mr. An
ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner has filed the writ petition challenging the adverse remarks made by the High Court for the years 1994 and 1995 at one go and seeking promotion from the date on which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Jaora Sugar Mills Ltd., and Others Etc.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-10-1996
Commercial Consumer
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3(3), 7, 12, 15 to 17, 19 and 21
1996VIIIAD(SC)554; AIR1997SC600; 1996(8)SCALE88; (1997)9SCC207; [1996]Supp7SCR411
U.N. Bachawat,; B.S. Banthia and; S.K. Agnihotri, Advs
1. These appeals by special leave are filed against the judgment and order dated September 1, 1978 and September 4, 1978 passed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench in Misc. Petition Nos. 140,139, 43...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnil Bansal Vs. Ashok Kumar Bansal and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-27-2004
Arbitration
2004(1)ARBLR422(SC); 2004(2)AWC1787(SC); JT2004(5)SC50; 2004(2)SCALE772; (2005)9SCC368
U.N. Bachawat,; Sunil Gupta and ; A.K. Chitale, Sr. Advs.,;
S.H. Kapadia, J. 1. A partnership firm, M/s Laxmi Fancy Stores had among others Laxmi Narayan Bansal, Om Prakash Bansal, and Jagdish Prasad Bansal as its partners. It carried on business from a shop owned by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVikas Vs. State of Rajasthan
Supreme Court of India
Aug-02-2002
Criminal
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 304B, 364, 498 and 498A
AIR2002SC2830; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)213; 2002CriLJ3760; 2002(3)Crimes62(SC); JT2002(5)SC573; 2002(5)SCALE477; (2002)6SCC728; [2002]SUPP1SCR435; 2002(2)LC1210(SC)
U.N. Bachawat, Sr. Adv.,; Harinder Mohan Singh,; Anil Hooda
Shah, J.1. Daily, demon of dowry is devouring lives of young girls, who marry with high hopes of having heavenly abode in their husband's house. In few cases, guilty are punished but it has no deterrent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatpal P. Malhotra and Others Vs. Puneet Malhotra and Others
Mumbai
Jun-14-2013
Land Acquisition
Mr. Dwarkadas, Mr. D'Vitre
By this appeal filed under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘Arbitration Act, 1996), the appellants seek to challenge the order dated 31st May, 2010 passed by the learned District Judge...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDharambir and anr. Vs. State
Delhi
Jul-26-2011
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313, 157, 161, 311
Mr. U. N. Bhachawat; Mr. Syed Hasan Isfahani; Mr. Alok Bhachawat, Advs.
1. The Appellants Dharambir, Raghubir Singh and Satbir @ Sattey (the Appellant Ratti Kaur has expired and the proceedings against her have abated) stand convicted by the judgment and order dated 24.03.1998 and 27.03.1998 passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamgopal and anr. Vs. Balaji Mandir Trust and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-19-2003
TenancyTrusts and Societies
Madhya Pradesh Public Trust Act, 1951; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 3(2), 12 and 12(1); Wakf Act, 1954
AIR2003SC1883; JT2003(2)SC498; 2003(2)MPHT338; 2003(2)SCALE340; (2003)5SCC17; [2003]2SCR212
U.N. Bhachawat, Sr. Adv.,; Alok Bhachawat,; Sushil Kumar Jain
Shivaraj V. Patil, J.1. Leave granted.2. The plaintiffs filed a suit against the defendant for the eviction from the house and shop given to them on rent. The plaintiff No. 1 is a religious institution registered...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTown and Country Development Authority Vs. Sitaram Choudhary and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-31-1998
Property
Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 38; Madhya Pradesh Town Improvement Trust Act, 1960 - Sections 51, 60(1), 70 and 71
AIR1999SC548; JT1998(6)SC658; (1998)5SCC576
ORDER1. Jabalpur Town & Country Development Authority, appellant herein, is an authority established under Section 38(1) of M.P. Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973. It is the successor to the Jabalpur Town Improvement Trust (hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »