Advanced Search Results

Ratanlal Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1970WLN334

L.S. Mehta, J.1. This is a review application submitted on behalf of Ratan Lal under Secection 561-A, Cr. P.C., for re-hearing the case. The avermenta in the application are that S.B. Criminal Revision No. 347 of...

Nawal Kishore Tara Chand Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7, 10(7), 12, 16 and 20; Prevention of Food Adulteration (Amendment) Act, 1964; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 198-B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rules 7 and 18; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 500 and 501

Reported in : AIR1969Delhi198; 1969CriLJ881

Advocate for Appellant : U.M. Trivedi,; S.P. Pandey and; D.P. Bajaj, Advs

ORDER1. On November 1, 1961, Shri M. L. Zutshi, Food Inspector, went to the shop of Shri Naval Kishore, petitioner, and purchased a quantity of chillies powder for purpose of analysis. On one of the samples...

Manohar Singh Ji Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(1), 14, 19(1), 31(1), 31(2) and 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 113; Rajasthan Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 4; Rajasthan Ordinance, 1948 - Sections 8A

Reported in : AIR1953Raj22

Advocate for Appellant : U.M. Trivedi and; Jeewan Singh, Advs.

Wanchoo, C.J. 1. This is an application by Rao Sahib Manohar Singhji, Jagirdar of Bedla under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the State of Rajasthan for the issue of writ of mandamus or...

Chiranjilal Vs. Sumer Oil Mills

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1953Raj134

Advocate for Appellant : U.M. Trivedi, Adv.

ORDERSharma, J.1. This is an application in revision by the defendant Chiranjilal against whom the plaintiff opposite party filed a suit for the recovery of Rs. 35,143/10/- as damages for breach of contract. The contract was...

Longmal and ors. Vs. Superintendent of Police and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Police Act, 1861 - Sections 2, 7 and 12; Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 - Rules 3(1), 34 and 35; Constitution of India - Articles 20(2), 166(3) and 309

Reported in : AIR1967Raj214; (1969)IILLJ266Raj

Advocate for Appellant : M. Mridul, Adv. for (Karansingh and Bhawanishanker) and; U.M. Trivedi, Adv. for (Randhirsingh and Lo

Beri, J. 1. These six writ petitions of the members of the police service of the State of Rajasthan raise some common questions and, therefore, they could he conveniently disposed of by one judgment. Petition No....

Narbadashankar Manoharlal Jaiswal Vs. Jamnabai Manoharlal and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 54(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 76

Reported in : AIR1961MP21; [1963]47ITR44(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : U.M. Trivedi, Adv.

ORDERH.R. Krishnan, J.1. This is an application by the defendant in a suit pending before the Civil Judge Ujjain, praying that his order admitting into evidence certified copies of four documents (two by the defendant and...

Navinchandra Chotelal Vs. Central Board of Excise and Customs and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 258

Reported in : AIR1971SC2280; 1981(8)ELT679(SC); (1971)1SCC289; [1971]3SCR357

Advocate for Appellant : U.M.Trivedi,; Swaranjit Sodhi and S.S. Shukla, Adv

C.A. VaidialingamJ.1. This appeal, by special leave, is against the judgment and order dated August 24, 1966 Of the Circuit Bench of the Punjab High Court at New Delhi dismissing in limine Civil Writ No. 666-D...

Lachmi NaraIn Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 7

Reported in : ILR1970Delhi435

Advocate for Appellant : U.M. Trivedi,; R.P. Bansal,; S.P. Pandey,;

Hardayal Hardy, J. (1) The petitioner in this case is the owner of a shop in Gadodia Market. On 30-3-1965 at about 4-30 P.M. his shop was visited by three food inspectors, namely, Shanti Nath, Dina...

Revisional Criminal Nawal Kishore Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 20

Reported in : 5(1969)DLT336; ILR1969Delhi356

Advocate for Appellant : U.M. Trivedi,; S.P. Pandey,; D.P. Bajaj and;

Jagjit Singh, J. (1) On November 1,1961, Shri M. L. Zutshi, Food Inspector, went to the shop of Shri Naval Kishore, petitioner and purchased a quantity of chillies powder for purpose of analysis. On one of...

Shantilal Vs. State and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 17, Rules 2 and 3

Reported in : AIR1958Raj7

Advocate for Appellant : U.M. Trivedi, Adv.

Wanchoo, C. J.1. This is an appeal by Shantilal against the order of the District Judge, Bhilwara, dismissing the application of Shantilal under Order IX, Rule 9, C. P. C. for restoration of a suit alleged...