Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: u k patil · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.070 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 04 2006

State of Maharashtra Vs. Vimlabai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-04-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 307 and 498A

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3118; I(2007)DMC157

Advocate for Appellant : U.K. Patil, A.P.P.

P.S. Brahme, J.1. Heard Mr. U. K. Patil, A.P.P. for the appellant-State & Mr. C.V. Thombre, advocate for Respondents.2. This Criminal Appeal is against the judgment and order, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 2003

The State of Maharashtra Through Collector Vs. Gangadhar S/O Girmalapp ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-19-2003

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 4(1), 6 and 18; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act - Sections 23(1A) and 28; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 30, 30(1); City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945; Mysore Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ; Evidence Act - Sections 11, 13, 42 and 43

Reported in : 2003(2)MhLj881

Advocate for Appellant : N.B. Khandare, AGP

A.B. Naik, J.1. These four appeals - two by the claimants and two by the State of Maharashtra, challenging the common judgment and award passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur in Land Acquisition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2005

Shivappa S/O Bhujangappa Bembale Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-07-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 - Rules 30, 57 and 110

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR437; 2005(3)MhLj709

Advocate for Appellant : Vivek Dhage, Adv.

P.B. Gaikwad, J.1. Petitioner Shivappa s/o Bhujangappa Bembale has filed present Writ Petition against Zilla Parishad through its Chief Executive Officer and requested for direction to regularise his services as a Peon w.e.f. 24-7-1970; further direction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 28 2005

Akshaykumar S/O Uttamlal Jaiswal Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-28-2005

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 66, 129A, 133A, 192, 213 and 213(5)

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR888; 2006(2)BomCR278; 2005(4)MhLj571

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Barlinge, Adv.;P.K. Joshi, Adv.

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Since common questions of law and facts arise in both these petitions, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. Rule.3. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith.4....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2005

Hemant Sudhakar Madane and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-26-2005

Subject : Other TaxesConstitution

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 127, 127(1), 149, 451 and 493 ; Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965; Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 23(1A) and 30(1); General Clauses Act - Sections 24; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Octroi Rules, 1969; Constitution of India - Articles 166 and 265

Reported in : 2005(3)ALLMR841; 2006(2)BomCR307

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah, Sr. Adv. and ;S.P. Deshmukh, Adv.

Khandeparkar R.M.S., J.1. Heard.2. Rule.3. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith.4. Though the writ petition has been filed seeking various reliefs, the learned Senior Advocate for the petitioners has sought leave to restrict the petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2005

Marathwada Association for Social Services Vs. State of Maharashtra an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-11-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay Public Trust Act; Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 82, 82(1), 82(3), 82(4), 82(5) and 83; National Council for Teachers Education Act, 1993 - Sections 5(1), 14, 14(1), 15(1) and 32; National Council for Teachers Education (Form of application for recognition, the lime of submission of application, determination of norms and standards for recognition of teachers education from time to time and permission to start new course or training) Regulation, 2002; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR784; 2005(3)MhLj308

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah and ;N.L. Jadhav, Advs. in W.P. No. 7676 of 2004 and ;V.G. Gangapurwala, Adv. holding for ;J.R. Patil, Adv. in W.P. No. 7677 of 2004

M.G. Gaikwad, J.1. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, petitions are heard and decided finally.2. These two petitions have been decided by this common judgment as in both petitions point involved and relief claimed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2006

Sunanda Ashok Bhosale and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-31-2006

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 125, 125(1) and 125(2)

Reported in : 2006(5)MhLj720

Advocate for Appellant : P.R. Patil, Adv.

D.G. Karnik, J.1. Rule. By consent, rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.2. By this petition, the petitioners challenge the communication dated 4th July,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2007

Zelabai W/O Chintaman Chandasare Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-16-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4 and 18; Constitution of India - Articles 141 and 142

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR122; 2008(2)BomCR916; (2007)109BOMLR1029

Advocate for Appellant : A.V. Patil, Adv. holding for V.D. Gunale, Adv.

Naresh H. Patil, J.1. Heard counsel appearing for parties.2. Rule, returnable forthwith. By consent of parties taken up for hearing.3. The petitioner's land was subjected to acquisition. The respondent No. 3/Special Land Acquisition Officer, Jalgaon passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2005

Sardar Surjeetsingh and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-10-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Sachkhand Shri Hazur Apchalnagar Sahib Act, 1956 - Sections 53, 53(1) and 53(2); Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Sachkhand Shri Hazur Apchalnagar Sahib Rules, 1958 - Rule 3; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 86B; Punjab Panchayat Samities and Zilla Parishads Non-official Members (Payment of Allowances) Rules, 1965 - Rules 3 to 7; Constitution of India - Articles 102, 158, 158(2), 191, 191(1), 361 and 361(4)

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR382; 2006(2)BomCR704; 2006(1)MhLj538

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Deshmukh, Adv.

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Heard.2. Perused the records.3. The petitioners challenge the notifications dated 16-1-2003 and 21-10-2004 issued by the respondent No. 1 to the extent it appointed the respondent No. 4 either as the Member or...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2005

Sainath Traders and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Food and Drug Administrat ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-05-2005

Subject : Food Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 3, 7, 23, 23(1A) and 24; Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003 - Sections 3; Maharastra Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1962 - Rule 3; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 62; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 19(1)

Reported in : 2006(4)BomCR457

Advocate for Appellant : V.J. Dixit, Adv.

Deshpande A.P., J.1. The instant petition challenges four orders issued by the Commissioner, Food and Drugs administration and Food (Health) Authority. Maharashtra State. Mumbai dated 2-11- 2004, 29-1-2005, 31-1-2005 and 8-2-2005. The challenge is based on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial