Advanced Search Results

Mukesh Kumar and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Direct Taxation

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. C. Gupta

NAGENDRA RAI, J. :As a common question of law is involved in both the cases, though they have been heard on two different dates, they are being disposed of by this common judgment. In both the...

Mukesh Kumar and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245C, 245D(1), 245D(4), 245F(1), 245H, 276C and 277

Advocate for Appellant : Indu Shekar Singh, Senior Adv., Ram Adya Singh, Ajay Kumar and Jagdish Kumar, Advs.

Nagendra Rai, J.1. As a common question of law is involved in both the cases, though they have been heard on two different dates, they are being disposed of by this common judgment. In both the...

Bhanu Prakash Agarwal Vs. Munnalal and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 7, Rule 7

Reported in : AIR1979MP157

Advocate for Appellant : K.L. Mangal, Adv.

ORDERH.G. Mishra, J. 1. This is a revision directedagainst order dated 4-4-1977 passed by the trial Court rejecting the plaintiff's application for amendment to incorporate subsequent event in the plaint.2. Facts essential for present purposes are...

Hotel Vivek Continental Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M.P. Financial Corporation, Inco ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 31, 31(1), 32, 32(4), 32(6) and 32(8); Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR1991MP156; 1991(0)MPLJ36

Advocate for Appellant : U.K. Jain, Adv.

Dr. T. N. Singh, J.1. Admittedly, the petitioner is an 'industrial concern' within the meaning of the terra employed in Section 2(c)(iii) of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, for short, the 'Act'. He moved this...

Ramesh Singh and ors. Vs. Vaijanti Bai and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 41, Rule 25

Reported in : 2003(3)MPHT497; 2003(4)MPLJ162

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Jain, Sr. Adv. and ;U.K. Jain, Adv.

ORDERUma Nath Singh, J.1. A judgment dated 6-9-2000 passed by learned 1st Additional District Judge, Morena, in Civil Appeal No. 70-A/96 setting aside the judgment and decree dated 10-9-97 passed by learned 1st Civil Judge, Class-I,...

Dr. Gopaldas and ors. Vs. Rajesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1955 - Sections 4; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 12(1) and 13; Madhya Pradesh Public Trust Act - Sections 32

Reported in : 2006(1)MPHT53

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Jain, Sr. Adv. and ;U.K. Jain, Adv.

Subhash Samvatsar, J.1. This appeal is filed by the tenant challenging judgment and decree dated 29-1-1999 passed by Third Additional District Judge, Vidisha in Civil Appeal No. 3-A/96, whereby the First Appellate Court has confirmed the...

Smt. Usha and ors. Vs. State

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 372 and 379; Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 6 - Schedule - Articles 1 and 12

Reported in : AIR1993MP41

Advocate for Appellant : U.K. Jain, Adv.

ORDERT.N. Singh, J. 1. The order impugned is in a sense a peculiar order. Legislature's language has apparently misled the learned Judge and confounded his wits, but what I have failed to appreciate is his approach...

Ridh Karan Patni Vs. Jagdish Prasad Agarwal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 5, 6, 7, 10, 12, 12(1), 12(6) and 13(1)

Reported in : AIR1990MP224

Advocate for Appellant : U.K. Jain, Adv.

K.V. Verma, J.1. Sensing a conflict between 'Jagdish Chandra v. Sara Bai, 1984 MPRCJ (Note) 105, dated 13-3-1984 of Muley, J. and 'Phool Chandra Garg v. Ram Narain' in C. M. A. No. 85 of 1974,...

Ramadhar Sharma Vs. Sewaram S/O Shriram and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22, Rules 3, 4(5) and 9 - Order 43, Rule 1; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 1999(2)MPLJ461

Advocate for Appellant : U.K. Jain, Adv.

ORDERS.P. Srivastava, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by an order dated 7-12-1996 passed by the First Appellate Court whereunder allowing the appeal and setting aside the order of the trial Court, rejecting the application filed by the plaintiffs...

Saroj Vs. Ajit Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : FamilyCivil

Reported in : II(1993)DMC228

Advocate for Appellant : U.K. Jain, Sr. Adv. and; Ajay Aggarwal, Adv.

Amarjeet Chaudhary, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 3.4.1991 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Gurgaon, whereby application of the appellant for setting aside ex parte Decree of divorce dated 2.4.1990, has...