Advanced Search Results

Pradip Madgaonkar @ Bandya Mama Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act 1999 - Sections 3(1), 3(1), 5, 20, 23(1) and 23(2); Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 25, 27 and 35; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120(B), 302, 384, 385, 386, 387, 452, 504 and 506; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act 1987 - Sections 20A(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 190 and 319

Advocate for Appellant : V.T. Tulpule, Sr. Counsel and ;M.K. Kocharekar, Adv. in Criminal Writ Petition No. 988 of 2006, ;V.T. Tulpule and ;M.K.Kocharekar, Advs. in Criminal Writ Petition No. 989 of 2006, ;Sushil Kumar, Sr. C

J.N. Patel, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. These four writ petitions can be disposed of by a common order as more or less the petitioners...

Dayaram Chandramohan Kanswal Vs. the Inspector of Police, Kapurbawdi P ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201, 302, 306 and 498-A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 113-A, 174 and 176; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961; Coroners' Act, 1871; Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983;

Reported in : 1998BomCR(Cri)95; 1997CriLJ2713

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Kotwal, Adv.

ORDERA.V. Savant, J. 1. Heard both the learned Counsel. 2. The petition is by an unfortunate father whose daughter deceased Mangaleshwari was married to Bhagwati Prasad Samwal at Ulhasnagar, Thane. It is stated in the petition...

Prakash Pralhad Patil Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 24(1), 24(8), 25, 25(1), 25A and 301; Conduct of the Legal Affairs of Government Rules, 1984 - Rule 22, 22(1), 22(2) and 22(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR2183

Advocate for Appellant : V.T. Tulpule and ;Umesh Mankapure, Adv.

B.H. Marlapalle and R.Y. Ganoo, JJ.1. Heard Mr. Tulpule with Mr. Mankapure the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. Rule. Respondents waive service. The petition has been finally heard.3. The petitioner has challenged the order dated...

The State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Narayan Agro Udyog Private Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 44(3); Maharashtra Land Revenue (Conversion of Use of Land and N.A. Assessment) Rules, 1969 - Rule 4

Reported in : 1997(1)BomCR21

Advocate for Appellant : Tulpule, Adv. and ;K.K. Tated, A.G.P.

M.L. Dudhat, J.1. This first appeal is preferred by the appellants against the Judgment and decree dated 15-2-1992 passed by the Vth Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune in Special Civil Suit No. 167 of 1990....

Tryambak Lilaji Binnar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1989 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2)

Reported in : 2002BomCR(Cri)661; (2002)2BOMLR798; 2002CriLJ3059; 2002(3)MhLj293

Advocate for Appellant : V.T. Tulpule, Adv.

A.B. Palkar, J.1. The appellant original accused No. 1 in Special Case No. 10/88 on the file of Special Judge, Nasik, has challenged his conviction and consequent sentence of RI for one year and fine of...

The Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Muhammad Masud Muhammad MahsIn B ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 35 and 37; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 20; Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1881 - Rule 7A, 7B and 7C; Bombay Salt Act, 1890 - Sections 3 and 17; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 9, 11, 18 and 25; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58, 100 and 110; Constitution of India - Article 294; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 99 and 100; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 31 and 32;

Reported in : 1997(2)BomCR314

Advocate for Appellant : Rafique Dada, Special Counsel,; V.T. Tulpule, Government Pleader, ;K.K. Tated, Asssistant Government Pleader for appellants Nos. 1 and 2,; Rajiv Kumar, Adv., i/b., Milan Bhise Co., for appellants No.

M.L. Dudhat, J.1. This appeal and the cross appeal are filed against the judgment and decree dated 23rd June 1993 passed by the learned District Judge, Raigad, Alibag in Land Acquisition Reference No. 184 of 1986....

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Vinayak Shivajirao Pol and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 201, 235, 313 and 378 ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 24, 45 and 61; Army Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Article 19 and 21

Reported in : 1998BomCR(Cri)109; 1998CriLJ306; I(1998)DMC322

Advocate for Appellant : V.T. Tulpule, P.P.

ORDERV.H. Bhairavia, J. 1. This appeal is preferred by the Stale against the order dated 31st March 1984 passed in Sessions Case No. 61 of 1983, thereby the respondents-accused have been acquitted of the offences punishable...

State of Maharashtra Vs. Anjanabai Alias Anjana Mohan Gavit and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code Sections 34, 109, 120B, 201, 302, 323, 325, 356, 363, 364, 379, 409, 466, 467, 468, 471 and 477A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 177, 178, 220, 223 and 223(d)

Reported in : 1997BomCR(Cri)775; 1997CriLJ2309

Advocate for Appellant : V.T. Tulpule, Public Prosecutor and ;U.D. Nikam, Special Public Prosecutor

ORDERA.V. Savant, J.1. Heard both the learned Counsel. 2. This is a Writ Petition filed by the State of Maharashtra, challenging the two Orders; one dated 18th January, 1997 which is passed below Exhibit 'B' to...

Life Insurance Corporation of India and ors. Vs. Presiding Officer and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 17 and 36A

Reported in : 111(2004)DLT100; 2004(74)DRJ165; 2004(3)SLJ478(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Ravinder Sethi, Sr. Adv.,; Nandini Sahni and; Rajiv Kumar G

Madan B. Lokur , J.1. The Petitioner is aggrieved by an Award dated 18th June, 2001 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal in I.D. No. 27/91. The impugned Award was notified under Section 17 of...

West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. and ors. Vs. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. E ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : [1987(54)FLR742]; (1994)IIILLJ1152Bom

Advocate for Appellant : F.D. Damania and ;J.B. Balia, Advs.

Pendse, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners employer are challenging the legality of the award dated June 30, 1983 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Maharashtra, Bombay, fixing...