Advanced Search Results
M.B. Phanse Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Gujarat
Feb-03-2004
Service
BCSRs Rules - Rule 327
(2004)2GLR1299
J.T. Trivedi and; B.J. Trivedi, Advs. Special Civil Application No. 10223 of 1999
Ravi R. Tripathi, J. 1. The present petition is filed by the petitioner,who retired as Additional Principal Judge of the CityCivil Court-Ahmedabad, seeking the relief by way ofdirections to the respondents, to add the period ofservice...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWall Street Construction Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit
Mumbai
May-06-1999
Direct Taxation
[1999]71ITD47(Mum); (2002)75TTJ(Mumbai)653
Y.P. Trivedi & Ms. Usha Dalal, for the Assessee K. V Dave Raj Kumar, for the Revenue
ORDERH.C. Srivastava, A.M.Both the appeals concern the same assessee and the same assessment year. They are being disposed of together for the sake of convenience.2. ITA No. 9595/Bom/1995 is decided first. The ground of appeal of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaju Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-25-2001
Criminal
Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 5A, 8 and 18; Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 - Sections 11D; Essential Commodities Act - Sections 3 and 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 379 and 401
2002CriLJ124
Satish Trivedi and ;Anil Kumar Singh, Advs.
ORDERR.B. Misra, J. 1. The above mentioned Criminal Misc, Application, Writ Petition and Criminal Misc. Revision involve the common question relating to the order of learned Judicial Magistrate as well as learned Sessions Judge, rejecting the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Tika Ram and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and ors. Etc. Etc.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-09-2009
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1A), 3A, 3(3A)(3), 3B, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5A, 5(4), 6, 6(1), 6(2), 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 11, 11A, 17, 17(1), 17(1A), 17(2), 17(3), 17(3A), 17(4), 17(4A), 18, 23(1A), 34 and 48; Land Acquisition (Uttar Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Act, 1991 - Sections 1, 2, 2(4), 3 and 4; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984; Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1987; Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 39, 48, 48A, 141, 226, 245, 246, 254(2), 254(3) and 300A; Land Acquisition (Uttar Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Ordinance, 1990
JT2009(12)SC1; 2009(12)SCALE349; (2009)10SCC689:2009AIRSCW6465
R.N. Trivedi,; Rakesh Kr. Dwivedi,; Dinesh Dwivedi, Sr.
V.S. Sirpurkar, J.Background of Appeals1. This judgment will dispose of Civil Appeal Nos. 2650-2652 of 1998, 3162 of 1998, 3176 of 1998, 3415 of 1998, 3561 of 1998, 3597 of 1998, 3923 of 1998, 3939 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. B.R. Enterprises Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-07-1999
ConstitutionCommercial
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(6), 40, 47, 53, 73, 162, 245, 246, 248, 258, 266, 269(3), 276, 286(3), 292, 293, 298, 301, 302, 303 and 304; Lotteries(Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 12(3); Government of India Act, 1935; U.P. Unauthorized Lottery(Prevention) Act, 1995 - Sections 8;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 294A; English Lotteries Act, 1823; Common Wealth of Australian Constitution Act, - Sections 21, 73 and 92; Lotteries and Amusements Act, 1976; Lotteries and Art Unions Act, 1901-1929;
AIR1999SC1867; JT1999(3)SC431; 1999(3)SCALE171; [1999]2SCR1111
R.N. Trivedi and; C.S. Vaidyanathan, Additional Solicitor Generals,;
A.P. Misra, J. 1. Special leave granted in all the special leave petitions. We are witnessing in this case exhibition of Federalism in true spirit. Contrary to the usual pouring in of citizen's writ petitions for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askipca Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai
Jul-02-2001
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 80A, 80A(2), 80C to 80U, 143(3), 147, 148, 149, 149(1), 260A and 288(2)
[2001]251ITR401(Bom)
Y.P. Trivedi, Sr. Adv.;F.V. Irani and ;Atul K. Jasani, Advs.
S.H. Kapadia, J.1. The short question which arises for determination in this appeal is as follows :'Whether the loss in respect of export of trading goods was to be ignored while determining the appellant's entitlement to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH.S. JaIn and ors., Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors., Etc.
Allahabad
Dec-19-1996
ConstitutionCivil
Constitution of India - Articles 74(2), 163, 164, 164(2), 174, 175(2) 178, 188, 226, 355, 356, 356(1), 356(2), 356(3), 356(5) and 361; Representation of the Peoples Act, 1951 - Sections 73 and 178
(1997)1UPLBEC594
Hari Shanker Jain, ;Satish Chandra Mishra and ;R.N. Trivedi, Advs.
B.M. Lal, B. Kumar and M. Katju, JJ.1. For the reasons recorded separately this court unanimously holds that the impugned Presidential Proclamation dated 17-10-1996 reimposing Presidential Rule under Article 356 of the Constitution of India in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPragnesh Hariprasad Parikh Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Gujarat
May-14-2007
Criminal
Bombay Police Act - Sections 147G; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 57, 156, 156(3), 161(1), 167, 190, 197, 209, 309, 377, 397, 397(1), 397(2), 397(3), 398 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 395 and 397
(2007)3GLR2716
K.B. Anandjiwala and; V.M. Trivedi, Advs.
K.M. Mehta, J.1. Pragnesh Hariprasad Parikh, applicant, original accused No. 2, has filed this Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') with a prayer that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarvaiya and Co. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Dec-10-1975
Sales Tax
Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 61(1)
[1976]38STC86(Bom)
Y.P. Trivedi, ;J.K. Seth, ;C.B. Mehta, ;A.S. Shaikh and ;T.H. Khatri, Advs.
Kania, J.1. This is a reference under section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, made at the instance of the assessee. The question, which has been referred to us, for our consideration is as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askipca Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Gajanand Meena, Deputy Cit and ors. (No. 2)
Mumbai
Jul-02-2001
Direct Taxation
(2001)170CTR(Bom)582; [2001]251ITR416(Bom)
Y.P. Trivedi, Senior Advocate, with (F.V Irani & A.K. Jasani), for the Assessee R.V. Desai, Senior Advocate, with P.S. Jetley and J.P. Deodhar, instructed by H.D. Rathod, for the Reven
S.H. Kapadia J.Both the above writ petitions involve the same question of law. Both the petitions involve the same parties. Hence, they are heard together.By the above two writ petitions, the petitioner which is an Export...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »