Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: the public prosecutor · Page 1 of about 76,053 results (0.794 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 24 2000

State by Rural Police, Chamarajanagar, Mysore District Vs. Siddaraju a ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-24-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 107, 306 and 498-A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113-A

Reported in : 2000CriLJ4220; ILR2000KAR2778; 2000(5)KarLJ494

Advocate for Appellant : Sri B.C. Muddappa, Additional State Public Prosecutor

1. This appeal concerns, predominently the important aspect of law as to whether the contracting of a second marriage by a husband during the subsistence of the first one and at a time when the first...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1998

High Court of Karnataka Vs. K. Sankaran Nayar and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-14-1998

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 214, 215, 216, 225 and 226; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 7, 12, 13, 14 and 15; State Reorganization Act, 1956 - Sections 54; Mysore High Court Act - Sections 19; The High Court of Karnataka Rules, 1959 - Rules 6 and 8; Karnataka Contempt of Court Rules - Rule 13

Reported in : 1999(1)ALD(Cri)638; ILR1999KAR674; 1999(6)KarLJ645

Advocate for Appellant : Sri B.R. Nanjundaiah, State Public Prosecutor and ;Sri N.B. Viswanath, Government Pleader

ORDERP. Padmaraj, J.1. The respondents 1 to 5 are the printer and publisher, the Managing Director, the Chief Editor, the Resident Editor and the Journalist employed on the paper of a daily newspaper known as 'The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1974

The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad Vs. Adunuthula Ki ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-14-1974

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 378, 378(1), 378(2) and 378(3)

Reported in : AIR1975AP54

Advocate for Appellant : Public Prosecutor

S. Obul Reddi, C.J. 1. In these two applications, the question that arises for consideration is whether it is necessary under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for the Public Prosecutor to file...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 16 1999

State Through Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bhatkal Division, Uttar ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-16-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 114, 142, 143, 147, 148, 201, 302, 300 and 323; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 27

Reported in : 2000(2)KarLJ218

Advocate for Appellant : Sri B.V. Pinto, Additional State Public Prosecutor

1. This appeal has been preferred by the State of Karnataka and it assails an order of acquittal recorded in favour of original accused 5 to 9 in S.C. No. 13 of 1994 on the file...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 2005

State of Mizoram Vs. Lalrinkhuma

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-20-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 114 and 118; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342, 376 and 376(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 428; Constitution of India - Article 21

Advocate for Appellant : N. Sailo, Public Prosecutor

B.P. Katakey, J.1. This appeal is by the State for enhancement of the sentence awarded by the learned Additional District Magistrate (Judicial), Alzawal District, Aizawl, where by the respondents was convicted by a judgment of conviction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 2008

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Deepti Anil Devasthali and Leena Anil Dev ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-15-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 201, 302, 328, 342, 364A, 387, 419, 465, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 304, 311, 329, 329(1), 374, 375, 376, 377 and 423; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 374, 375 and 376; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR3643; 2008(4)MhL.R.476

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Borulkar, Public Prosecutor, ;S.D. Shinde, ;Rajeshree Gadhvi and ;Pawar, Additional Public Prosecutors

ORDERBilal Nazki, J.1. Both the accused-appellants are convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 120B along with certain other offences. Under Section 302 read with Section 120B, they have been sentenced...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 1992

State of Karnataka Vs. Jatti

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-28-1992

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1993(1)ALT(Cri)321; 1992CriLJ3835; ILR1993KAR987; 1992(2)KarLJ505

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Bannurmath, Addl. State Public Prosecutor

1. This appeal by the State arises out of and is directed against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Karwar in S.C. No. 19/1989. The learned Sessions Judge, by an order made in that case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2006

Murlidhar Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-03-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj1234; 2006(2)WLC138

Advocate for Appellant : Ronak Singhvi, Amicus curiae and; B.N. Sandu, Public Prosecutor

S.K. Sharma, J.1. Instant appeal filed by the accused appellant Murlidhar is against the judgment dated 3rd July, 2001 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, No. 2, (Fast Track), Kota whereby he convicted the appellant for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 1998

State of Rajasthan Vs. Chautha Ram

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-22-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 102, 109, 457 and 482

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1851

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Bohra, Public Prosecutor

ORDERAmaresh Ku. Singh, J.1. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor. None appeared on behalf of the non-petitioner.2. By this petition Under Section 482, Cr.P.C., the petitioner has prayed that the order dated 1st May, 1996 passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2001

Banshilal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-14-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 363 and 376

Reported in : RLW2003(1)Raj592; 2002(2)WLN52

Advocate for Appellant : M.C. Bishnoi, Amicus Curiae and; A.R. Nikub, Public Prosecutor

Prasad, J. 1. The present appeal has been filed by the accused appellant against his conviction under Section 363 and 376 IPC. The accused has been sentenced as under: -Name of accused appellantsCharges1.Labh SinghSections 8/23 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial