Advanced Search Results
The Special Tahsildar (Lao), Land Acquisition Ii, Tamil Nadu Housing B ...
Chennai
Feb-23-2001
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 9, 18 and 23; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 103
(2001)1MLJ657
Mr. V. Ravi, Additional Government Pleader
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J. 1. Special Tahsildar (LAO) Land Acquisition-II, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Madras-35 is the appellant in the above appeal. Aggrieved by the order of the learned Subordinate Judge in L.A.O.P.No. 13 of 1993 dated,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Tamil Nadu Vs. East Coast Constructions and Industries
Chennai
Feb-11-1985
Sales Tax
Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 5A(1); Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 7, 7A, and 7A(1)
[1986]61STC337(Mad)
K.S. Bakthavatsalam, Additional Government Pleader
Ramanujam, J.1. In this tax revision case filed by the revenue, the decision of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal holding that the turnover of Rs. 9,55,485.78 could not be brought to charge under section 7-A(1)(a) of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Tamil Nadu Vs. South India Drum Manufacturing Co.
Chennai
Jun-27-1984
Sales Tax
Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 10
[1985]60STC110(Mad)
K.S. Bakthavatsalam, Additional Government Pleader (Tax Cases)
Ramanujam, J. 1. In this tax revision case filed by the State, the order of the Tribunal cancelling the penalty levied under section 10(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act has been questioned. It is seen...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The State of Madras Vs. the Madura Knitting Co., Ltd.
Chennai
Aug-26-1958
Sales Tax
[1959]10STC155(Mad)
The Additional Government Pleader ;and G. Ramanujam, Adv.
Panchapakesa Ayyar, J.1. This is an appeal by the State of Madras represented by the District Collector, Madurai, the defendant in O.S, No. 108 of 1953 on the file of the Subordinate Judge of Madurai, against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Tamil Nadu Vs. S. Syam Steel Rolling Mills (P.) Ltd.
Chennai
Feb-03-1977
Sales Tax
[1977]40STC156(Mad)
K.S. Bakthavathsalam, Additional Government Pleader
Ismail, J.1. This is a revision petition preferred by the State under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act (1 of 1959), hereinafter referred to as the Act, against the order of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Nippon Steel Corporation Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-07-2006
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 13, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 30, 33, 34 and 39(1); Companies Act, 1956; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 119 and 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3, Rule 5; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rule 786
AIR2007SC327; 2006(4)ARBLR171(SC); 2007(1)AWC648(SC); 2007(4)BomCR233; [2006]134CompCas712(SC); JT2006(10)SC238; 2006(12)SCALE211; (2007)2SCC382
Gopal Subramanium, A.S.G.,; K.R. Sasiprabhu,; Sreegesh M.K.
AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. is the appellant. Aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 6th/8th December, 2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Appeal No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRichardson and Cruddas Ltd. Vs. the State of Madras
Chennai
Jul-28-1964
Sales Tax
[1965]16STC827(Mad)
N. Srinivasan, Adv.
Ramamurti, J.1. The petitioner in the tax revision case is Richardson and Cruddas Ltd., a limited liability company, carrying on business in structural engineering work, and as contractors at the First Line Beach, Madras. It is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKishor M. Gadhave Patil and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra, throu ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
Dec-16-2015
Land Acquisition
R.M. Borde, J. 1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for respective parties. 2. Petitioners are functioning as Additional Government Pleaders / Additional Public Prosecutors / Assistant Government...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBadri Vishal Gupta Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-23-2007
Criminal
2007CriLJ4421; 2007(3)MPHT453
Mr. Naman Nagrath
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. In this writ appeal cogency and substantiality of the order dated 25-10-2005 passed by the learned Single Judge in the Writ Petition No. 4753/2004 has been called in question.2. Bereft of unnecessary details...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Mohan S/O. Gopalrao Mate Vs. Principal Secretary, Urban Developme ...
Mumbai
Aug-14-2008
Property
Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 10(3), 20, 20(1), 20(2), 21, 21(1), 21(2) and 23; Urban Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966; General Clause Act - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 52(1), 249 and 250
2008(6)ALLMR41; 2009(1)BomCR275; (2008)110BOMLR2696
C.V. Kale, Adv.;S.V. Akolkar, Adv.
D.D. Sinha, J.1. Rule made returnable forthwith by the consent of Mr.C.V.Kale, Counsel for Petitioner, Mr.S.V.Akolkar, Adv. for Intervenor and Mrs.Dangre, Additional Government Pleader for Respondents. Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties.2. Counsel for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »