Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: the additional government pleader · Page 1 of about 10,815 results (0.500 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 23 2001

The Special Tahsildar (Lao), Land Acquisition Ii, Tamil Nadu Housing B ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-23-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 9, 18 and 23; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 103

Reported in : (2001)1MLJ657

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. Ravi, Additional Government Pleader

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J. 1. Special Tahsildar (LAO) Land Acquisition-II, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Madras-35 is the appellant in the above appeal. Aggrieved by the order of the learned Subordinate Judge in L.A.O.P.No. 13 of 1993 dated,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1985

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. East Coast Constructions and Industries

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-11-1985

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 5A(1); Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 7, 7A, and 7A(1)

Reported in : [1986]61STC337(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Bakthavatsalam, Additional Government Pleader

Ramanujam, J.1. In this tax revision case filed by the revenue, the decision of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal holding that the turnover of Rs. 9,55,485.78 could not be brought to charge under section 7-A(1)(a) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 1984

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. South India Drum Manufacturing Co.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-27-1984

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 10

Reported in : [1985]60STC110(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Bakthavatsalam, Additional Government Pleader (Tax Cases)

Ramanujam, J. 1. In this tax revision case filed by the State, the order of the Tribunal cancelling the penalty levied under section 10(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act has been questioned. It is seen...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 26 1958

The State of Madras Vs. the Madura Knitting Co., Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-26-1958

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1959]10STC155(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : The Additional Government Pleader ;and G. Ramanujam, Adv.

Panchapakesa Ayyar, J.1. This is an appeal by the State of Madras represented by the District Collector, Madurai, the defendant in O.S, No. 108 of 1953 on the file of the Subordinate Judge of Madurai, against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1977

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. S. Syam Steel Rolling Mills (P.) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-03-1977

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1977]40STC156(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Bakthavathsalam, Additional Government Pleader

Ismail, J.1. This is a revision petition preferred by the State under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act (1 of 1959), hereinafter referred to as the Act, against the order of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2006

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Nippon Steel Corporation Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-07-2006

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 13, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 30, 33, 34 and 39(1); Companies Act, 1956; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 119 and 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3, Rule 5; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rule 786

Reported in : AIR2007SC327; 2006(4)ARBLR171(SC); 2007(1)AWC648(SC); 2007(4)BomCR233; [2006]134CompCas712(SC); JT2006(10)SC238; 2006(12)SCALE211; (2007)2SCC382

Advocate for Appellant : Gopal Subramanium, A.S.G.,; K.R. Sasiprabhu,; Sreegesh M.K.

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. is the appellant. Aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 6th/8th December, 2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Appeal No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1964

Richardson and Cruddas Ltd. Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-28-1964

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1965]16STC827(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : N. Srinivasan, Adv.

Ramamurti, J.1. The petitioner in the tax revision case is Richardson and Cruddas Ltd., a limited liability company, carrying on business in structural engineering work, and as contractors at the First Line Beach, Madras. It is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2015

Kishor M. Gadhave Patil and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra, throu ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Dec-16-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

R.M. Borde, J. 1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for respective parties. 2. Petitioners are functioning as Additional Government Pleaders / Additional Public Prosecutors / Assistant Government...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2007

Badri Vishal Gupta Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-23-2007

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2007CriLJ4421; 2007(3)MPHT453

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Naman Nagrath

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. In this writ appeal cogency and substantiality of the order dated 25-10-2005 passed by the learned Single Judge in the Writ Petition No. 4753/2004 has been called in question.2. Bereft of unnecessary details...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2008

Shri Mohan S/O. Gopalrao Mate Vs. Principal Secretary, Urban Developme ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-14-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 10(3), 20, 20(1), 20(2), 21, 21(1), 21(2) and 23; Urban Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966; General Clause Act - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 52(1), 249 and 250

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR41; 2009(1)BomCR275; (2008)110BOMLR2696

Advocate for Appellant : C.V. Kale, Adv.;S.V. Akolkar, Adv.

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Rule made returnable forthwith by the consent of Mr.C.V.Kale, Counsel for Petitioner, Mr.S.V.Akolkar, Adv. for Intervenor and Mrs.Dangre, Additional Government Pleader for Respondents. Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties.2. Counsel for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial