Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: thakar das · Page 1 of about 78 results (0.074 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 16 1969

Shabir Rashid Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-16-1969

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1969CriLJ1282

Om Parkash, J.1. This appeal, from jail, is directed, against an order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, convicting and sentencing the appellant, under Sections 366 and 876, Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 1952

Padam Chand and ors. Vs. Ram Lal and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-29-1952

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 3, Rule 4 - Order 8, Rule 6 - Order 21, Rules 80 and 77(2); ;Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 48; ;Transfer of Property Act - Section 2; ;Stamp Act, 1899 - Section 2(10) - Schedule - Article 23

Reported in : AIR1953HP11

Advocate for Appellant : Thakar Das, Adv.

Chowdhry, J.C. 1. This is a defendants' first appeal under paragraph 31 (b) of the Himachal Pradesh (Courts) Order, 1948, against the judgment and decree of the learned Senior Subordinate Judge of Jubbal, dated 17-1-1951.2. In,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1955

Budhia Vs. Dhani Ram and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-31-1955

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : AIR1956HP1

Advocate for Appellant : Thakar Das, Adv.

Ramabhadran, J.C. 1. This purports to be an appeal under Order 43, Rule 1(u), Civil P. C., against an order of remand made by the learned District Judge of Mahasu under Order 41, Rule 23, read...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 12 1962

Bansilal Kanchhedilal and anr. Vs. Hukumchand Khunnelal and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-12-1962

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 34, Rules 33, 5, 5(1) and 5(3) - Order 21, Rules 69, 89, 90 and 92; Co-operative Societies Act, 1912; Co-operative Societies Rules - Rule 27; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 60, 89 and 93; Madras Debt Conciliation Act, 1939 - Sections 14;

Reported in : AIR1963Bom230; (1962)64BOMLR731; ILR1963Bom45; 1963MPLJ9

Advocate for Appellant : P.P. Deo and ;V.R. Manohar, Advs.

Patel, J.1. This is an appeal under Clause (15) of the Letters Patent from the judgment of Badkas, J. The appeal arises under the following circumstances:The two appellants who were originally judgment debtors were members of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2016

K.M. Mohammed Shafi and Others Vs. Union of India represented by its S ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-12-2016

Subject : FERA

Ashok Bhushan, C.J. 1. The petitioners have filed this writ appeal against judgment dated 13.8.2015 in W.P(C) No.23197 of 2015 by which judgment, the writ petition has been dismissed. 2. The brief facts of the case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 1989

Y.V. Anjaneyulu Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-15-1989

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37(2), 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 139, 143, 143(3), 147, 148, 148(1), 148(2), 149, 256(2) and 263; Gift Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 5(1)

Reported in : (1990)89CTR(AP)43; [1990]182ITR242(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : Y. Ratnakar and ;Dastur, Advs.

Seetharam Reddy, J. 1. The petitioner who was a legal practitioner and was later elevated as a judge of this court in November, 1983 (since recently retired), impugns the validity of the note dated March 10,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1927

Bharat Bhai Vs. Jai Narain

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-15-1927

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1928All102; 108Ind.Cas.129

Iqbal Ahmad, J.1. This is a defendant's appeal and arises out of a suit for sale on a mortgage dated 11th April 1912, executed by Mulu, adoptive father of the defendant-appellant, for a sum of Rs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 2002

Basheer Unnissa Begum and Syed Mohammed Rowther Vs. T. Sundaram (Decea ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-25-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100

Reported in : (2002)2MLJ747

Advocate for Appellant : R. Muthukumarasamy, Sr.Counsel for ;A. Jeenasenan, Adv.

A. Ramamurthi, J.1. The unsuccessful defendants in the courts below are the appellants.2. The case in brief is as follows:- The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title to 'B' schedule property and also for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 2018

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S. Chamundi Winery and Distil ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-25-2018

Subject : Service Tax

1/137 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF SEPTEMBER2018PRESENT THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON’BLE Mrs.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA I.T.A.No.155/2016 C/W I.T.A.No.458/2013, I.T.A.No.467/2015 I.T.A.No.173/2017, I.T.A.No.172/2017 I.T.A.No.155/2016 Between:1. The Pr. Commissioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 1953

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Thakur Dass Bhargava

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-03-1953

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1954P& H17; [1953]24ITR275(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Sikri, Adv. General,; H.R. Mahajan and; Rajindar Sa

Kapur, J.1. This is a case stated by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal of Delhi in which the following question has been referred for the opinion of this Court:'Whether the sum of Rs. 32,500/- received by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial