Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: tej pal · Page 1 of about 318 results (0.062 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 12 1995

Shamsher Tappi Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-12-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Evidence Act - Sections 118, 119 and 145

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2328

Advocate for Appellant : R.P.S. Chauhan, ;Tej Pal and ;S.P. Sharma, Advs.

S.N. Tripathi, J. 1. Accused Shamsheralias Tappi has been convicted on a charge Under Section 376 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo 4, years R.I. vide judgment and order dated 28-6-1994 passed by IVth Addl. Sessions Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 1990

Pratap S/O Chandan Singh and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-23-1990

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 323 and 504; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4(1), 154(2), 157(2), 161, 173, 173(2), 190(1), 200, 202, 204, 207, 211, 212, 213, 226, 228, 231, 233(1), 233(2), 233(3), 234, 235(2), 302, 304 and 313; Constitution of India - Article 21; Foulkes' Administrative Law

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1669

Advocate for Appellant : Tej Pal, Adv.

ORDERG.P. Mathur, J.1. This criminal revision has been filed challenging the order dated 22-8-1990 passed by the XIII ACJM, Agra, in Misc. Case No. 8, of 1990 summoning the accused applicants to face trial Under Sections...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 1997

Suresh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-01-1997

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 17; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 494; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 25 and 26; Muslim Law

Reported in : I(1999)DMC304

Advocate for Appellant : Tej Pal, Adv.

Binod Kumar Roy, J.1. Following prayers have been made in this writ petition:(i) To quash the order dated 29.11.1995, passed by CO., Civil Lines, Jhansi (respondent No. 3), as contained in Annexure-10, directing the application dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 07 1999

CaptaIn Chand Singh Vs. Miss Preeti

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-07-1999

Subject : Family

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7 and 19(1); Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Sections 5 - Article 58; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125, 125(3) and 488; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 20 and 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC268

Advocate for Appellant : Tej Pal, ;Sukhendra Pal and ;Amrendra Pal, Advs.

Binod Kumar Roy and Lakshmi Bihari, JJ.1. This is an appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts, Act against the order dated 7.9.1999 passed by Sri Z. Khan, Judge. Family Court. Agra, rejecting the appellant's...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 1993

Mr. Naresh Kumar JaIn and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-18-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 107, 111 and 116

Reported in : 1993CriLJ1352

Advocate for Appellant : Tej Pal, Adv.

ORDERVirendra Saran, J.1. I have heard Sri Tej Pal, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel who both agree that the writ petition may be finally disposed of.2. An order purporting to be under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 1998

Ex. Nayak Ram Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-21-1998

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1998(2)AWC1223

Advocate for Appellant : Tej Pal Singh, Adv.

M. Katju, J.1. Heard counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner has been discharged from the Army. There are as many as four adverse entries against him, two of them are of 1993 and the earlier were...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2000

Abhinandan Singh Vs. Mahesh Kumar Mishra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-10-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1975 - Sections 35; Bar Council of India Rules, 1975 - Rule 39

Reported in : AIR2001All77

Advocate for Appellant : Tej Pal, ;K.D. Tiwari, ;D. Kumar, ;J.S. Sengar and ;R.P.S. Chauhan, Advs.

ORDERB.K. Rathi, J.1. This petition was dismissed as not pressed on 29-10-99. The petitioner has now moved an application to recall the order dated 29-10-99 and to restore the petition and to decide it on merits....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2003

Dan Behari Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-03-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 301 and 302

Reported in : 2003CriLJ4959

Advocate for Appellant : Tej Pal and ;G.S. Chaturvedi, Adv.

K.N. Ojha, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against order of conviction and sentence dated 16-7-1980, passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Mathura, in Sessions Trial No. 164 of 1979, State v. Dan Behari, by which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 1998

Ashok Kumar Vs. District Magistrate, Jalaun and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-25-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 387, 504 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Uttar Pradesh Control of Goondas Act; U.P.D. Act - Sections 12 and 14; Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act - Sections 2, 3 and 4; Constitution of India - Article 22(5)

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC77

Advocate for Appellant : Tej Pal, Adv.

R.R.K. Trivedi, J.1. In both the aforesaid petitions, questions of facts and law involved are similar and both the petitions may be decided by acommon order against which learned counsel for the parties have no objection....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 1990

Dori and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-09-1990

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Dacoity Affected Areas Act, 1983 - Sections 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 323 and 394;

Reported in : 1991CriLJ3139

Advocate for Appellant : Pratap Narain Misra, ;Tej Pal and ;B.B. Paul, Advs.

Palok Basu, J.1. This appeal has been filed by two brothers Dori and Kamal Singh. These two and two others, namely, Babu Kumhar and Narain Singh were accused in Sessions Trial No. 159 of 1983. Babu...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial