Advanced Search Results
Mohd. Anis S. Vs. Management of Indian Overseas Bank, Rep. by Its Regi ...
Karnataka
Jul-12-2005
Service
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 11A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 408 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 248(1); Industrial Law
(2005)IIILLJ804Kant
S.G. Hegde, Adv.
ORDERN. Kumar, J.1. The petitioner was initially appointed as temporary sub-staff in June 1972 and later on worked on probation and confirmed. On May 23, 1985 he was working as Shroff/Godown keeper in the respondent- bank...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Ramesh Kumar, Driver S/O Shri Jage Ram Vs. Delhi Transport Corpor ...
Delhi
May-31-2007
Service
Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 15(2); Delhi Road Transport Rules and Regulations, 1972; Delhi Road Transport Appointment/Appointment and Service Regulations, 1952 - Sections 15(2); Constitution of India - Article 226
141(2007)DLT457
B.K. Pal, Adv
Kailash Gambhir, J.1. By way of this writ petition the petitioner, a DTC driver of bus No. 15936, has sought to challenge the show cause notice dated 3.10.1994 whereby the petitioner was put to show cause...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Marimuthu Vs. the General Manager (D and Pb) and
Chennai
Apr-30-2010
Service
State Bank of India Officers Service Rules
A.V. Subramanian, Sr. Counsel for; P. Tamilavel, Adv.
ORDERM. Jeyapaul, J.1. The petitioner was serving as Assistant Manager, State Bank of India at Avinashi during the year 1996. During that point of time, he was looking after agricultural crop loans. He was transferred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Subhas Chandra Bose Vs. the Trustees for the Improvement of Calcutta a ...
Kolkata
Dec-22-1987
Service
Service Law
(1989)1CALLT376(HC)
Jamini Kumar Banerjee and ;Subodh Chandra Bhattacharya, Advs.
Paritosh Kumar Mukherjee, J.1. In the present writ petition, the petitioner Subhas Chandra Bose has challenged the illegal grant of promotion in respect of private respondent Nos. 8 and 9, without preparing any detailed seniority list...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of West Bengal Etc. Vs. M.R. Mondal and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-03-2001
ConstitutionCommercial
National Highways Act, 1956 - Sections 5 and 12(1); National Highways Authority of India Act, 1988 - Sections 11; National Highways (Fees for the use of National Highway Sections and Permanent Bridge-Public Funded Project) Rules, 1997 - Rules 5, 6 to 8 and 9
2001VIIAD(SC)184; AIR2001SC3471; JT2001(7)SC200; 2001(6)SCALE82; (2001)8SCC443
Harish N. Salve, Solicitor General,; Mukul Rohatgi, Additional Solicitor General,;
Raju, J.1. Special leave granted.2. These appeals have been filed by the National Highways Authority of India, who was not a party to the proceedings in the High Court, but with the permission granted by this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.R. Mondal Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Kolkata
May-16-2005
ConstitutionCivil
National Highways Act - Sections 11 and 12(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 227; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17
(2005)3CALLT189(HC)
Saktinath Mukherjee and ;Manas Dasgupta, Advs.
Narayan Chandra Sil, J.1. This revisional application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order impugned No. 85 dated 3.11.2003 passed by Sri S. Mukherjee, learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Additional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaya Majumdar Gupta and ors. Vs. Principal Basirhat College and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-30-1957
Constitution
Calcutta University Regulations - Regulations 5, 6 and 8; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;University Act, 1904 - Section 25
AIR1957Cal428,61CWN334
Nagendra Nath Bose, Adv. (in Nos. 2955 and 3004 of '56), ;Ranjit Kumar Banerjee and ;Tarun Kumar Banerjee, Advs. (in Nos. 3261-63 of '56) and ;Arun Prakash Chatterjee, Adv. (in No. 3425 of '56)
ORDERSinha, J. 1. These are six matters in which the facts are similar and there is a common point of law involved. They have been heard together, and in view of what has happened before me...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBirendra Kumar Dutta Vs. Charu Chandra Dutta and anr.
Kolkata
Nov-26-1957
Civil
Court Fees Act, 1870 - Section 7; ;Suits Valuation Act, 1887 - Section 8
AIR1959Cal537,63CWN380
Tarun Kumar Banerjee, Adv.
ORDERS.K. Sen, J.1. This revisional application is directed against an order of the learned Munsif, 1st Court, Howrah, accepting the valuation made by the plaintiffs in a suit for the purpose of court fees and jurisdiction....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSm. Rebarani Sen Gupta Vs. Ashit Sen Gupta
Kolkata
Jun-25-1964
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 9(1)
AIR1965Cal162
Tarun Kumar Banerjee and ;Bimal Chandra Chatterjee, Advs.
P.N. Mookerjee, J.1. This is the wife's appeal against a decree for restitution of conjugal rights. The material facts lie within a short compass and they may fee stated as follows:2. The parties were married in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHemanga Coomar Mookherjee and ors. Vs. M.C. Chakravarty
Kolkata
Nov-30-1951
Banking
Banking Companies (Amendment) Act, 1950 - Section 11; ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 58; ; Companies Act, 1913 - Section 178; ; Banking Companies Act, 1949 - Sections 45A and 45B
AIR1952Cal732,[1952]22CompCas270(Cal),56CWN632
Apurbadhan Mukherjee and ; Tarun Kumar Banerjee, Advs.; Sudhansu Bhusan Sen, Adv.
Chakravartti, J.1. This Rule which involves a a short point under the Banking Companies (Amendment) Act 1950, arises out of the following facts.2. The petitioners are the owners of Premises No. 10B Canal Circular Road, Calcutta,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »