Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: tarun kumar banerjee · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.031 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 12 2005

Mohd. Anis S. Vs. Management of Indian Overseas Bank, Rep. by Its Regi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-12-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 11A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 408 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 248(1); Industrial Law

Reported in : (2005)IIILLJ804Kant

Advocate for Appellant : S.G. Hegde, Adv.

ORDERN. Kumar, J.1. The petitioner was initially appointed as temporary sub-staff in June 1972 and later on worked on probation and confirmed. On May 23, 1985 he was working as Shroff/Godown keeper in the respondent- bank...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2007

Shri Ramesh Kumar, Driver S/O Shri Jage Ram Vs. Delhi Transport Corpor ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-31-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 15(2); Delhi Road Transport Rules and Regulations, 1972; Delhi Road Transport Appointment/Appointment and Service Regulations, 1952 - Sections 15(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT457

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Pal, Adv

Kailash Gambhir, J.1. By way of this writ petition the petitioner, a DTC driver of bus No. 15936, has sought to challenge the show cause notice dated 3.10.1994 whereby the petitioner was put to show cause...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2010

M. Marimuthu Vs. the General Manager (D and Pb) and

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-30-2010

Subject : Service

Acts : State Bank of India Officers Service Rules

Advocate for Appellant : A.V. Subramanian, Sr. Counsel for; P. Tamilavel, Adv.

ORDERM. Jeyapaul, J.1. The petitioner was serving as Assistant Manager, State Bank of India at Avinashi during the year 1996. During that point of time, he was looking after agricultural crop loans. He was transferred to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 22 1987

Subhas Chandra Bose Vs. the Trustees for the Improvement of Calcutta a ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-22-1987

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Reported in : (1989)1CALLT376(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Jamini Kumar Banerjee and ;Subodh Chandra Bhattacharya, Advs.

Paritosh Kumar Mukherjee, J.1. In the present writ petition, the petitioner Subhas Chandra Bose has challenged the illegal grant of promotion in respect of private respondent Nos. 8 and 9, without preparing any detailed seniority list...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 2001

State of West Bengal Etc. Vs. M.R. Mondal and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-03-2001

Subject : ConstitutionCommercial

Acts : National Highways Act, 1956 - Sections 5 and 12(1); National Highways Authority of India Act, 1988 - Sections 11; National Highways (Fees for the use of National Highway Sections and Permanent Bridge-Public Funded Project) Rules, 1997 - Rules 5, 6 to 8 and 9

Reported in : 2001VIIAD(SC)184; AIR2001SC3471; JT2001(7)SC200; 2001(6)SCALE82; (2001)8SCC443

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve, Solicitor General,; Mukul Rohatgi, Additional Solicitor General,;

Raju, J.1. Special leave granted.2. These appeals have been filed by the National Highways Authority of India, who was not a party to the proceedings in the High Court, but with the permission granted by this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 2005

M.R. Mondal Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-16-2005

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : National Highways Act - Sections 11 and 12(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 227; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : (2005)3CALLT189(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Saktinath Mukherjee and ;Manas Dasgupta, Advs.

Narayan Chandra Sil, J.1. This revisional application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order impugned No. 85 dated 3.11.2003 passed by Sri S. Mukherjee, learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Additional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1957

Maya Majumdar Gupta and ors. Vs. Principal Basirhat College and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-30-1957

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Calcutta University Regulations - Regulations 5, 6 and 8; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;University Act, 1904 - Section 25

Reported in : AIR1957Cal428,61CWN334

Advocate for Appellant : Nagendra Nath Bose, Adv. (in Nos. 2955 and 3004 of '56), ;Ranjit Kumar Banerjee and ;Tarun Kumar Banerjee, Advs. (in Nos. 3261-63 of '56) and ;Arun Prakash Chatterjee, Adv. (in No. 3425 of '56)

ORDERSinha, J. 1. These are six matters in which the facts are similar and there is a common point of law involved. They have been heard together, and in view of what has happened before me...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1957

Birendra Kumar Dutta Vs. Charu Chandra Dutta and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-26-1957

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court Fees Act, 1870 - Section 7; ;Suits Valuation Act, 1887 - Section 8

Reported in : AIR1959Cal537,63CWN380

Advocate for Appellant : Tarun Kumar Banerjee, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Sen, J.1. This revisional application is directed against an order of the learned Munsif, 1st Court, Howrah, accepting the valuation made by the plaintiffs in a suit for the purpose of court fees and jurisdiction....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 1964

Sm. Rebarani Sen Gupta Vs. Ashit Sen Gupta

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-25-1964

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 9(1)

Reported in : AIR1965Cal162

Advocate for Appellant : Tarun Kumar Banerjee and ;Bimal Chandra Chatterjee, Advs.

P.N. Mookerjee, J.1. This is the wife's appeal against a decree for restitution of conjugal rights. The material facts lie within a short compass and they may fee stated as follows:2. The parties were married in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1951

Hemanga Coomar Mookherjee and ors. Vs. M.C. Chakravarty

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-30-1951

Subject : Banking

Acts : Banking Companies (Amendment) Act, 1950 - Section 11; ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 58; ; Companies Act, 1913 - Section 178; ; Banking Companies Act, 1949 - Sections 45A and 45B

Reported in : AIR1952Cal732,[1952]22CompCas270(Cal),56CWN632

Advocate for Appellant : Apurbadhan Mukherjee and ; Tarun Kumar Banerjee, Advs.; Sudhansu Bhusan Sen, Adv.

Chakravartti, J.1. This Rule which involves a a short point under the Banking Companies (Amendment) Act 1950, arises out of the following facts.2. The petitioners are the owners of Premises No. 10B Canal Circular Road, Calcutta,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial