Advanced Search Results

U.P. State Electricity Board and anr. Vs. Deputy Labour Commissioner a ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6(1), 6H(1) and 6H(2)

Reported in : 2003(2)AWC1622; [2002(95)FLR846]

Advocate for Appellant : Tarun Agarwal, Adv.

Vineet Saran, J. 1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 23.9.1993 of the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Agra, passed under Section 6H (1) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as...

U.P. State Electricity Board and ors. Vs. Presiding Officer, Industria ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 4, 19(3) and 19(6)

Reported in : (1995)IILLJ95All

Advocate for Appellant : Tarun Agarwal, Adv.

P.K. Mukherjee, J.1. The present writ petition is listed for admission today. However, with the consent of learned counsel for both the parties, it is being disposed of finally.2. The facts of the case, in brief,...

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Haridwar Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6N and 14A; Constitution of India - Articles 38, 39, 42, 43, 43A and 226

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1013; [1999(81)FLR990]; (1999)IILLJ297All

Advocate for Appellant : Tarun Agarwal and ;Rakesh Tewari, JJ.

O.P. Garg, J.1. These are three connected writ petitions. In Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 2109 of 1997, counter and rejoinder-affidavits have been exchanged. The subsequent two Writ Petition Nos. 41787 of 1998 and 1654 of...

Sanjay Agarwal and Another Vs. Nagar Mahapalika, Allahabad and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 133

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2319; (1999)2UPLBEC1442

Advocate for Appellant : Tarun Agarwal, Adv.

Ravi S. Dhavan, J.1. Present : Mr.Tarun Agarwal on behalf of the petitioners. Messrs. Ashok Mehta, Chief Standing Counsel. U. P., B. N. Misra. Additional Standing Counsel. U. P., Krishna Prasad, Standing Counsel. U. P.. U....

U.P. State Electricity Board and ors. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Co ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 4K

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1095; [2002(93)FLR416]; (2002)2UPLBEC1127

Advocate for Appellant : Tarun Agarwal, Adv.

Anjani Kumar, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Tarun Agarwal and Shri Shyam Narain, appearing for the concerned workman. 2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the interim award dated...

Simbhaoli Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Appellate Authority and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 - Sections 2, 12, 14, 15, 15(4), 16(1) and (2) and 28; U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Rule, 1954 - Rules 22, 22(1), 23 and 25; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC1867

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Gupta, ;Tarun Agarwal, ;Vineet Saran and ;Krishna Murari, Advs.

M.C. Jain, J.1. There is a spate of writ petitions every year involving and concerning the provisions of U. P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and U....

Hindustan Lever Ltd. and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CommercialConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Krishi, Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 2, 17 and 32; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4, 4(1) and (3), 18, 19, 19(3) and 20 to 24; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 366(29) and (29A)

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1706; (1999)2UPLBEC982

Advocate for Appellant : Tarun Agarwal, Adv.

M. Katju, J.1. This writ petition has been (lied praying for a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 22.7.1998 passed by the Mandi Samiti, Etah copy of which is Annexure-2 to the petition and...

In Re: Champaran Sugar Co. Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Reported in : [1998]91CompCas182(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Dhirendra Kumar, Adv., for Dr. B.C. Roy Pharmaceuticals Ltd., ;Sudhir Chandra, ;Tarun Agarwal and ;Geetha Luthra, Advs. for Hanuman Sugar and Industries Ltd., ;J.N. Tewari, Adv. for the company in liq

A.K. Banerji, J. 1. Vide the order dated June 28, 1993, the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction ('BIFR' in short) recommended the winding up of the company, Champaran Sugar Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as...

L. M. L. Ltd., Kanpur Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Kanp ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(14) and 2A, 39 and 39(5), 44, 45, 45(2), 45A and 45C to 45-I, 74, 75 and 75(1) and 82(2); Employees State Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1996; Employees State Insurance (Central) Rules, 1950; Indian Companies Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2039

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Gupta and;Tarun Agarwal, Advs.

O.P. Garg, J. 1. The petitioner,which is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and has its registered office at Panki Industrial Area, Kanpur, is undoubtedly covered under the provisions of the Employees State...

Har Gopal Jaiswal Vs. District Excise Officer, Kanpur Nagar and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2380; (2000)2UPLBEC1734

Advocate for Appellant : Tarun Agarwal and ;Sudhir Chandra, Advs.

Binod Kumar Roy and S. K. Jain,JJ.1. With consent of the parties this writ petition is being disposed of on merits at its admission stage.The prayer of the petitioner is to quash the recovery order dated...