Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: tapas kumar manna · Page 1 of about 2 results (0.034 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Jul 06 2005

Sudarshan Shaw Vs. Subhas Shaw

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-06-2005

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276, 293, 298, 370 and 372; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 108; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 198

Reported in : 2005(3)CHN456

Advocate for Appellant : Tapas Kumar Manna, Adv.

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.1. This appeal is at the instance of an applicant under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and is directed against Order No. 22 dated 4th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Jun 12 2003

Sanjib Chakraborty and anr. Vs. Ramanath Ghosh

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-12-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 21, 95 to 106

Reported in : (2003)3CALLT500(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : T.K. Ghosh and ;Tapas Kumar Manna, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J. 1. In course of hearing of the application for stay, the parties are agreed that the main appeal may be disposed of. Treating the appeal, by consent of the parties, as on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales