Advanced Search Results
Cwt Vs. Lalitchandra M. Patel
Gujarat
Jun-20-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]123TAXMAN682(Guj)
Tanvish Bhatt, for the Revenue
M.S. Shah, J. In this reference at the instance of the revenue, the following questions are referred for our opinion in respect of the assessment years 1970-71 to 1973-74 :'1. Whether, on the facts and in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChhayaben Suhashbhai Vs. Cwt
Gujarat
Jun-19-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]124TAXMAN5(Guj)
LP. Shah, for the Assessee Tanvish Bhatt, for the Revenue
M.S. Shah, J. In this reference at the instance of the assessee, the following questions are referred for our opinion :'1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Arunaben Sumankumar
Gujarat
Jul-03-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]124TAXMAN57(Guj)
Tanvish Bhatt, for the Revenue
M.S. Shah, J. In this reference at the instance of the revenue, the following question is referred for our opinion in respect of the assessment year 1983-84:'Whether the Tribunal is right in law insetting aside the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cit Vs. Goodluck Silicate Industries (P) Ltd.
Gujarat
Jul-26-2002
Direct Taxation
[2004]134TAXMAN715(Guj)
Manish R. Bhatt and Tanvish Bhatt, for the Revenue
K.A. Puj, J.In this reference, at the instance of the applicant revenue, the following question of law is referred to for the opinion of this court for assessment year 1987-88 :'Whether, the Tribunal is right in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCgt Vs. Arvindkumar Chandulal
Gujarat
Jul-04-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]123TAXMAN1107(Guj)
Tanvish Bhatt, for the Revenue
M.S. Shah, J. When this reference reached hearing today, Mr. Tanvish Bhatt, the learned standing counsel for the revenue, made a specific request that since this reference is covered by a reported decision of this court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Simplex Rayon and Silk Processors
Gujarat
Jul-03-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]123TAXMAN838(Guj)
Tanvish Bhatt, for the Revenue
K.A. Puj, J. At the instance of the revenue, the following question of law is referred by the Tribunal for the opinion of this court :'Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Lalitchandra M. Patel
Gujarat
Jun-20-2002
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 25(2)
[2002]258ITR232(Guj)
Tanvish Bhatt, Adv.
M.S. Shah, J. 1. In this reference at the instance of the Revenue, the following questions are referred for our opinion in respect of the assessment years 1970-71 to 1973-74 :'(i) Whether, on the facts and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Arunaben Sumankumar
Gujarat
Jul-03-2002
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132, 143(1) and 263
(2002)177CTR(Guj)470; [2003]259ITR386(Guj)
Tanvish Bhatt, Adv.
M.S. Shah, J.1. In this reference at the instance of the Revenue, the following question is referred for our opinion in respect of the assessment year 1983-84 : 'Whether the Tribunal is right in law in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Gift-tax Vs. Arvindkumar Chandulal
Gujarat
Jul-04-2002
Direct Taxation
Gift Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 12(12)
[2003]264ITR594(Guj)
Tanvish Bhatt, Adv.
M.S. Shah, J.1. When this reference reached hearing today, Mr. Tanvish Bhatt, learned standing counsel for the Revenue, made a specific request that since this reference is covered by a reported decision of this court and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNiko Resources Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Gujarat
Mar-26-2015
Land Acquisition
Mr. Bandish S. Soparkar
1. The Petitioner is a foreign company based in Canada and has set up a project office in India with the permission of Reserve Bank of India. The Petitioner is subject to income tax in India...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »