Advanced Search Results

Chandigarh Administration Vs. Nemo

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (2009)156PLR489

Surya Kant, J.1. The Chandigarh Administration has filed this writ petition purportedly in public interest, seeking permission for medical termination of the pregnancy of a mentally retarded girl [the name withheld and here-in-after referred to as...

Kanwal Kumar Vs. State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 409 and 467

Reported in : (2005)140PLR330

Advocate for Appellant : Tanu Bedi and; T.P.S. Mann, Advs.

Virender Singh, J.1. Vide this judgment, I shall be disposing of Criminal Revision No. 116 of 1995, Kanwal Kumar and Raghu Nath Sapra v. State of Punjab and Criminal Revision No. 704 for 195, Kultar Singh...

Noor Aga Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : NarcoticsConstitution

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 8, 9, 22, 23, 25, 35, 37, 37(1), 39, 42, 43, 50, 51, 52, 52A, 52A(1), 52A(2), 52A(4), 53, 53(1), 53(2), 53A and 54; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108, 108(4), 100(1B), 110, 110(1), 110(1A), 110(1B), 111, 123, 135, 138B, 138B(1), 180 and 184 ; Evidence Act - Sections 25, 113A, 113B and 114; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 26, 193 and 228; Human Rights Act, 1998 - Sections 3; Misuse of Drugs Act, 1971 - Sections 28, 28(2) and 28(3) ; Misuse of Drugs Act, 1975 - Sections 6(6); Dangerous Drugs Act, 1986; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 118 and 139; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 18(2) and 18(3); Prevention of Corruption Act; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987; Road

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR2254; 2008AIRSCW5964; 2008(4)LH(SC)2896

Advocate for Appellant : Tanu Bedi,; D.P. Singh,; Sanjay Jain,;

S.B. Sinha, J 1. Leave granted.INTRODUCTION2. Several questions of grave importance including the constitutional validity of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'the Act'), the standard and extent of burden of proof...

Suchita Srivastava and anr. Vs. Chandigarh Administration

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(4) and 5(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 376; Abortion Act, 1967; Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21; The National Trust for Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Act, 1999

Reported in : AIR2010SC235; 2010(2)BomCR472; JT2009(11)SC409; (2009)8MLJ658(SC); 2009(11)SCALE813; (2009)9SCC1; 2009(9)LC4151(SC):2009AIRSCW5909:2009(5)LHSC3204.2009(12)Scale813; [2009] 13 SCR 989

Advocate for Appellant : Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Adv.,; Tanu Bedi,; D.P. Singh,;

ORDERK.G. Balakrishnan, C.J.1. Leave granted.2. A Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in C.W.P. No. 8760 of 2009, by orders dated 9.6.2009 and 17.7.2009, ruled that it was in the best interests...

Kewal Krishan and Ashok Kumar Sons of Late Shri Lal Chand Vs. Shri S.P ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3540 of 2002 (O&M) Date of decision:01.07.2013 Kewal Krishan and Ashok Kumar sons of late Shri Lal Chand, resident of House No.2109, Sector 15-C,...

Aalok Jagga vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 12,2017 + W.P.(C) 2924/2014 SARIN MEMORIAL LEGAL AID FOUNDATION ........ Petitioner Present: Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P.S. Bindra, Mr....

Sarin Memorial Legal Aid Foundation vs.state of Punjab & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 12,2017 + W.P.(C) 2924/2014 SARIN MEMORIAL LEGAL AID FOUNDATION ........ Petitioner Present: Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P.S. Bindra, Mr....

Mandeep Kumar Vs. U.t. Chandigarh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : TUSHAR BAKSHI __

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1908 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.4173 OF2020 MANDEEP KUMAR AND OTHERS ….APPELLANT(S) VERSUS U.T. CHANDIGARH & OTHERS ….RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.K ....

Present:- Ms. Tanu Bedi Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

CRM M- 3978 of 2013 [1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM M-3978 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 24, 2013 Rajan Kaura and another …..Petitioners versus State of Punjab …..Respondent...

Present: Ms. Tanu Bedi Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh CRM-M No.9865 of 2013 Date of decision:01. 04.2014 Amarjit Singh and others ..Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahavir S....