Advanced Search Results
Rashik Lal and anr. Vs. Radha Dulaiya
Allahabad
Jun-14-1922
Family
(1923)ILR45All1
Stuart and Sulaiman, JJ.1. This is a defendant's appeal arising out of a suit for recovery of certain property including a 5 anna 4 pie zamindari share in village Patora Kalan and a 6 pie share...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRadha Dulaiya Vs. Rashik Lal and anr.
Allahabad
Jun-14-1922
Land Acquisition
AIR1923All25; 75Ind.Cas.14
1. This is a defendant's appeal arising out of a suit for recovery of certain property including a 5-annas 4-pies zemindari share in village Patora Kalan; and a 6 pies share in Lalitpur. The plaintiffs' case,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNissar Alias Pappu and Etc. Vs. the State
Delhi
Dec-12-1996
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302 ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 51 and 313
1997CriLJ1486
Talewar Singh, Adv
K.S. Gupta, J. 1. Nissar @ Pappu and Ram Kishan @ Rammu have been convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34, IPC vide judgment dated April 29, 1992 by on Additional Sessions Judge and by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
inder and anr. Vs. State
Delhi
Feb-25-1983
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 392 and 397
23(1983)DLT428
S.K. Sharma and; Talewar Singh, Advs
N.N. Goswamy, J.1. This judgment will also dispose of Criminal Appeal No. 69 of 1982 as both these appeals arise out of the same trial and judgment. The appellants, Inder and Bishamber in Cr. A. No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKuldip Dube Vs. Mahaul Dubb and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-20-1911
LimitationContract
(1912)ILR34All43
Tudball and Piggott, JJ.1. The parties to this suit are members of one and the same family. On the 9bh of January, 1904, they executed an agreement by which they, submitted various differences which had arisen...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsa Ram and anr. (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Apr-23-1991
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300, 302, 304, 323 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
1991CriLJ3221
R.K. Sangloo and ;G.P. Dixit, Advs.
G.K. Mathur, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated November 30, 1978 passed by Sri R. K. Gupta, Sessions Judge, Muzaffarnagar, in Sessions Trial No. 246 of 1978 by which the appellant,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamaswami Chettiar Alias Veerappa Chettiar and ors. Vs. Tyagaraja Pill ...
Chennai
Jan-04-1928
Civil
110Ind.Cas.16; (1928)55MLJ34
Kumaraswami Sastri, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit filed by the respondents to recover the balance of purchase money claimed under a sale deed filed as Ex. A in this case. The defendants raised...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChidambaram Chettiar Vs. Parvathi Achi
Chennai
Aug-21-1925
Civil
AIR1926Mad347; 87Ind.Cas.351
Jackson, J.1. Petitioner is defendant in O.S. No. 29 of 1923 on the file of the Sub-Court, Mayavaram. Plaintiff is suing in forma pauperis for maintenance due to her as a Hindu widow after the lapse...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMewa Lal Sahu and anr. Vs. Kumerji Jha and ors.
Kolkata
Feb-18-1909
Civil
2Ind.Cas.946
1. We are invited in this Rule to set aside a decision of the District Judge in which he has reversed the decision of the Munsif in a suit for recovery of money due for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaddak Hussain vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Delhi
May-15-2019
Criminal
Mr. Subodh K. Pathak, Mr. Adil Alvi, Mr. Balwan Singh
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 717/2018 Reserved on:01. 04.2019 Date of decision:15. 05.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: SADDAK HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Subodh K. Pathak, Mr. Adil Alvi...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›